Thanatos2k said:
Backpedaling back to the outrage defense. Circular reasoning du jour!
Looking down on people is right...
Looking down on people is wrong...
Ha what about the terrorists...
Ain't remotely comparable or the same...
Ha backpedaling...
Don't bring terrorists into this nonsense of yours...
Who said anything about terrorists...
Do this sort of stuff in youtube comments and/or reddit if you must but save it on a respectable forum. Lying to my face about events I was there for isn't going to gain any ground.
Cheap tricks like that ain't going to pass muster with me I assure you.
Thanatos2k said:
I'm going to break it to you nicely....you haven't at any point in any post in this thread been logically better than me. You have offered few if any arguments to the original point, have spun violently from one defense to the next without even knowing what you're talking about or where you're going, guessed at strawman arguments to attack, and peppered your lack of arguments with insults.
Wrong. The original point was you thinking you're every so dandy for your looking down of people.
I'm not on the defense as your "attacks" in regards to "looking down" don't apply to me, and you're the one scrambling for any justification of being right (what a joke) for treating others with contempt, and let us not forget why I shouldn't return that all back on you.
For someone talking about how PC and how about you have no problem being challenged... sure is a lot of instances of "stop insulting me"... once again from someone who believes he is just to rain scorn on others over platform wars... you couldn't make it up.
Thanatos2k said:
See, the thing is, when you try to make this kind of proclamation without evidence you simply appear arrogant. You have not earned the right to call yourself better than me or anyone, based on what we've seen here.
Never stops you now does it. Regardless your own character and words is more than enough.
Thanatos2k said:
Right about what, exactly? Seriously, what were you right about? My views have been completely consistent this entire time that PC is a superior platform to consoles and that at this point no one can legitimately argue otherwise. You have yet to provide a single rebuttal to this point, yet crow over and over that you were proven right. Are you joking or something? Or is this the classic last ditch effort of a failed debater, to simply repeat "I won" over and over hoping that you yourself eventually believe it?
My preempt was you attempting to use the "actually I own all these consoles" point as I had read comments of that nature belonging to you previously. Something which due to your widespread posts that drip with the juices of platform wars is simply not credible... now you didn't and instead tried to counter that all consoles are simply invalid.
Weak but using it instead of the point I preempted meant you could call me out on it and paint me negatively. However that does not mean my preempt has worn off and you can now unleash it... which you did thereby wiping your attempt to paint me negatively away.
Thanatos2k said:
You claimed I don't own consoles. I proved you wrong. But good work pretending "Aha! Exactly according to plan! I look foolish and then...uh....claim I'm right! BOW BEFORE ME!"
Excuse me? I already preempted that due to seeing your posts elsewhere and stating how it'd simply not be credible and... this does not mesh with your other comment in that very post. You talk of proof yet than talk about how you "proved" me wrong... you proved nothing.
Any platform wars foot soldier can claim they owned X, how believable they are depends on how they've carried themselves.
Out of those yet to be banned you're near the top on the unbelievable scale in regards to that.
Thanatos2k said:
I get it. You're basically saying "I don't care about evidence, I will never change my view point."
As I said, intellectually dishonest. You have no interest whatsoever in an actual discussion, and have no room for new information in your own little world. I think we're done here. I won't be replying to you again as you've admitted there is no point.
Congratulations you can take what I said and reword it. What I said at the end there was that even though the data has too many imperfections to prove any of the grand claims people attempt to claim it proves... you'll be linking to it endlessly regardless if you know of those imperfections or not.
As for the rest you've not said a single thing against what I said. You don't attempt to defend the imperfections (I doubt you are even aware due to the lack of challenge you've encountered thus far from the looks of it) and you certainly don't go anywhere near the fact that success is not exclusive to one particular section of the market.
You can't after all as than you'd have been arguing for the sake of it, but considering you know by past experience that I'd be challenging you to do so in this post you can say "I'm not responding because I don't like you and you're mean...not because I'd have to argue massive hogwash" to brush it off.
Thanatos2k said:
You tried to shame someone for using the word "retard." That's what we were talking about. Remember? You acting like the PC word police, the same one Yahtzee dismantled in this column. Oh god, maybe you don't even know it. I was totally right about the lack of self awareness. Crap. There really is no getting through. I'm...so sorry.
You try to shame others for owning consoles, tell me again who comes off worse here.
Yeah yeah you think you should freely say what you want without consequence. No doubt if this was somewhere else you'd be telling me to get cancer and die (reference).
Some people are too smart by half so fail to see things until reality hits them hard.
Charcharo said:
I am not the first nor the last person to have problems understanding you.
It is strange how you still do not know why I told you the line about the control + F.
Yes we have talked about emulation a lot, dear black and white friend of mine. Problem is, I never knew that the emulated version is OBJECTIVELY superior to the original console version... just sharing new info (for me).
Extraneous poppycock.
No I know full well.
Black and white = talking legality. I know, I mean you said to me at one point to paraphrase "even if illegal emulation is in fact piracy... I still think its correct because ".
And how did you not know that? Why would you argue all that with me when you don't know such basic facts... actually arguing on the other side of the subject of emulation is very easy. Its as simply as requesting the other person search laws on the matter and if they can't pinpoint it than you win... they get it than narrow it down further until hopefully they either give up or can no longer find something. I did link you to the what the EU said on that but you never replied back on that... and know I'm not going to search Bulgarian law itself. Whatever those are year old matters, just my ramblings on how much easier the other side has it.