Oh wow.Andy Chalk said:Unfortunately, children are now being exposed to same-sex marriage in a toy store.
I am posting this as a seperate comment, as am not normally into arguing with a specific person but am rather face palming at Volf, so if anyone objects this can be deleted.Volf said:I have my reasons, but I'm not going to derail the thread anymore than I have.SonicKoala said:True, but when you have absolutely no valid justification for not accepting a certain group, it certainly goes a long way in compromising the integrity of your opinion.Volf said:not accepting and hating something are not always the same thing.Pyrian said:Hate is a choice.Crono1973 said:The people who don't accept homosexuality are now the outcasts.
...your coming off as a little creepy, you know that? I'll leave my motto as is, thanksSidiron said:I am posting this as a seperate comment, as am not normally into arguing with a specific person but am rather face palming at Volf, so if anyone objects this can be deleted.Volf said:I have my reasons, but I'm not going to derail the thread anymore than I have.SonicKoala said:True, but when you have absolutely no valid justification for not accepting a certain group, it certainly goes a long way in compromising the integrity of your opinion.Volf said:not accepting and hating something are not always the same thing.Pyrian said:Hate is a choice.Crono1973 said:The people who don't accept homosexuality are now the outcasts.
It is funny dear sir, that you state your motto as; "The world is my country, all mankind are my brethern and to do good is my religion." [sic]
And, if I may be so bold, I advise a revision to that which reads, 'all mankind I agree with or don't have a particular reason to not accept or even hate, is my brethren'
Creepy? -Chuckles- I am inclined to disagree.Volf said:...your coming off as a little creepy, you know that? I'll leave my motto as is, thanksSidiron said:I am posting this as a seperate comment, as am not normally into arguing with a specific person but am rather face palming at Volf, so if anyone objects this can be deleted.Volf said:I have my reasons, but I'm not going to derail the thread anymore than I have.SonicKoala said:True, but when you have absolutely no valid justification for not accepting a certain group, it certainly goes a long way in compromising the integrity of your opinion.Volf said:not accepting and hating something are not always the same thing.Pyrian said:Hate is a choice.Crono1973 said:The people who don't accept homosexuality are now the outcasts.
It is funny dear sir, that you state your motto as; "The world is my country, all mankind are my brethern and to do good is my religion." [sic]
And, if I may be so bold, I advise a revision to that which reads, 'all mankind I agree with or don't have a particular reason to not accept or even hate, is my brethren'
Look, I like the Thomas Paine quote, so I'm not changing it.Sidiron said:Creepy? -Chuckles- I am inclined to disagree.Volf said:...your coming off as a little creepy, you know that? I'll leave my motto as is, thanksSidiron said:I am posting this as a seperate comment, as am not normally into arguing with a specific person but am rather face palming at Volf, so if anyone objects this can be deleted.Volf said:I have my reasons, but I'm not going to derail the thread anymore than I have.SonicKoala said:True, but when you have absolutely no valid justification for not accepting a certain group, it certainly goes a long way in compromising the integrity of your opinion.Volf said:not accepting and hating something are not always the same thing.Pyrian said:Hate is a choice.Crono1973 said:The people who don't accept homosexuality are now the outcasts.
It is funny dear sir, that you state your motto as; "The world is my country, all mankind are my brethern and to do good is my religion." [sic]
And, if I may be so bold, I advise a revision to that which reads, 'all mankind I agree with or don't have a particular reason to not accept or even hate, is my brethren'
I just like to see who I am arguing with and if you post stuff on the internet, you can't insinuate weirdness when someone reads it and takes you to task on evident hypocrisy, surely?
Otherwise this whole forum idea would be rather creepy?
I agree with you on most respects, but they're control over what they're children see is limited to what is inside of their home. Because a parent going to a store, being offended by a comic that is completely kid friendly and just doesn't align with their beliefs, and then demanding the publisher take the comics back is absurd. What of the parents who do believe in the message the book is saying? What of the parents that do agree with the book's message and believe that their children SHOULD see this kind of thing? Are we simply going to let one group of parents dictate how a store runs, despite everyone else's acceptance of it as something a child can see without harm?viranimus said:However, there is a degree of merit of a parent wanting to be able to take their child into a public place and not have their children directly exposed to something they didnt even take notice of. Im sorry but last I checked parents still have the right (though its been severely diminished) to raise their children the way they wish. I get very tired of seeing people who view anything less than pure acceptance and love toward homosexuality as an automatic label of ignorance or narrow mindedness. Not wanting to see homosexuality on every tv show, film, kids show and any other form of inappropriate and gross over representation is not ignorance or intolerance. Calling these people as such because they do not agree with your personal world view does not make it factual.
So yeah, lets try to act like adults and not call people names simply because they dont think like you do, because, yeah, thats fairly intolerant and incredibly hypocritical.
My apologies, I had one of those reply before you read entire thread moments.Volf said:comment #162, go to it right now
No problem, it took me a while to retract what I originally typed.NiPah said:My apologies, I had one of those reply before you read entire thread moments.Volf said:comment #162, go to it right now
Prejudiced and at the same incredibly patronising to children. They're not that stupid.topics that are too complicated for them to understand.
This. The market responds to consumer pressure, nothing else. All the forum bleating does nothing to One Million Moms. If you really want to stick it to them, then go out and buy the comic in droves.Blind Sight said:Then it's simple. Launch a complaint like these moms did, and the company will respond if there is enough of the consumer market that supports it. If not, and you still have a problem with it, don't go to their stores. Companies are private property that can enforce whatever 'decency' standards they wish, parents are only allowed to enforce their own 'decency' measures within their private property as well.Volf said:I didn't say sheltered, just that parents should be able to control what subjects toy stores expose children to.
Yes, but the point is that Toys R Us is a major chain that will constantly be host to all sorts of kids of all sorts of ages and parental backgrounds. If you are a parent who wants to push that agenda on your kids, thats fine. Get it from one of the other thousands of retail methods be it brick and mortar or online.GeneralFungi said:I agree with you on most respects, but they're control over what they're children see is limited to what is inside of their home. Because a parent going to a store, being offended by a comic that is completely kid friendly and just doesn't align with their beliefs, and then demanding the publisher take the comics back is absurd. What of the parents who do believe in the message the book is saying? What of the parents that do agree with the book's message and believe that their children SHOULD see this kind of thing? Are we simply going to let one group of parents dictate how a store runs, despite everyone else's acceptance of it as something a child can see without harm?viranimus said:However, there is a degree of merit of a parent wanting to be able to take their child into a public place and not have their children directly exposed to something they didnt even take notice of. Im sorry but last I checked parents still have the right (though its been severely diminished) to raise their children the way they wish. I get very tired of seeing people who view anything less than pure acceptance and love toward homosexuality as an automatic label of ignorance or narrow mindedness. Not wanting to see homosexuality on every tv show, film, kids show and any other form of inappropriate and gross over representation is not ignorance or intolerance. Calling these people as such because they do not agree with your personal world view does not make it factual.
So yeah, lets try to act like adults and not call people names simply because they dont think like you do, because, yeah, thats fairly intolerant and incredibly hypocritical.
By telling the store to stop selling these books, it's true that they're just raising their children the way they think is best for them, but they're also shoving their way of parenting down every other parent's throat and forcing it on them. If they're really extremely offended by this kind of thing, they can just I don't know... not buy the book for their child?
To respond to all your posts:Volf said:-snip-
Actually, hetero comics do this all the time. Comics often get things like marriage on the front cover, or kisses, if it's between straight people.kgpspyguy said:I Don't hate Homosexuals for being gay I hate them because they wont bloody shut up about it, I mean you wont ever catch me saying OHH LOOK EVERYBODY THIS COMIC HAS A STRAIGHT PERSON IN IT...ARE YOU LOOKING NO? HOW ABOUT NOW...YES? GOOD BECAUSE WE WOULDN'T WANT YOU TO MISS ANYTHING.
Personally, it's more tiring to see close minded people whine about being called close minded.I get very tired of seeing people who view anything less than pure acceptance and love toward homosexuality as an automatic label of ignorance or narrow mindedness.
Why, here. Homosexuality is not an issue of sex anymore than a straight marriage in a comic is. Unless you lobby to keep male/female kisses, hugs, and marriages (all of which are sexual by your definition) out of the same places, you're being narrow minded and ignorant.We already have a model of how sex and retail can coexist.