I'm not hugely surprised by the finding. I'm a little annoyed by how it gets contextualized and summarized.
Like it or not, when you describe something as "misogyny", it gets filed into a particular folder. One that in its broad strokes says: men are responsible for creating a culture in which hating women is acceptable and women as well as men internalize this hatred to the point that...
I'm curious if any similar study was made of insults or threats made towards men. It doesn't seem to me that one kind of threatening language is more unacceptable than the other, and it bothers me that there's an undercurrent that suggests that women and women alone need to be protected from this kind of atmosphere and men and men alone are responsible, whether for the threats themselves or for "changing the culture".
Yes, "misogyny" doesn't inherently imply men, but the term is sufficiently loaded that whenever I see the word get used there inevitably seem to be some who crop up to say that women internalize this hatred of women and men are somehow still responsible. It boggles my mind to see purported feminists suggesting that women aren't responsible for their own actions.
Any time dogma becomes self-proving and inviolate, however noble the underlying cause, I grit my teeth a bit.
Because the word "misogyny" gets buried under so many associations and so much pre-supposition, a more interesting and worthwhile point (in my humble opinion) that might actually be worth discussion gets buried. Men get called, as other people have said, dickhead, or asshole, or ************, or... whatever. Women get called slut and whore. ("*****" is more general, and probably over-used, but I think it also gets more attention than it should largely for being a female-specific epithet.)
...So while men are being called out for being jerks and/or idiots, women's behavior mostly seems to link back to suppositions about their sexual behavior. That is troubling... But because it gets filed under the broad, over-used catch-all of "misogyny", it barely gets a glance. For a lot of feminists, it's just one more thing to throw on the stack of "things men do wrong"; for a lot of men, it's a flag that they shouldn't bother walking into the minefield.
Internet gender politics as usual, in other words. Carry on...
Like it or not, when you describe something as "misogyny", it gets filed into a particular folder. One that in its broad strokes says: men are responsible for creating a culture in which hating women is acceptable and women as well as men internalize this hatred to the point that...
I'm curious if any similar study was made of insults or threats made towards men. It doesn't seem to me that one kind of threatening language is more unacceptable than the other, and it bothers me that there's an undercurrent that suggests that women and women alone need to be protected from this kind of atmosphere and men and men alone are responsible, whether for the threats themselves or for "changing the culture".
Yes, "misogyny" doesn't inherently imply men, but the term is sufficiently loaded that whenever I see the word get used there inevitably seem to be some who crop up to say that women internalize this hatred of women and men are somehow still responsible. It boggles my mind to see purported feminists suggesting that women aren't responsible for their own actions.
Any time dogma becomes self-proving and inviolate, however noble the underlying cause, I grit my teeth a bit.
Because the word "misogyny" gets buried under so many associations and so much pre-supposition, a more interesting and worthwhile point (in my humble opinion) that might actually be worth discussion gets buried. Men get called, as other people have said, dickhead, or asshole, or ************, or... whatever. Women get called slut and whore. ("*****" is more general, and probably over-used, but I think it also gets more attention than it should largely for being a female-specific epithet.)
...So while men are being called out for being jerks and/or idiots, women's behavior mostly seems to link back to suppositions about their sexual behavior. That is troubling... But because it gets filed under the broad, over-used catch-all of "misogyny", it barely gets a glance. For a lot of feminists, it's just one more thing to throw on the stack of "things men do wrong"; for a lot of men, it's a flag that they shouldn't bother walking into the minefield.
Internet gender politics as usual, in other words. Carry on...