Sex work is work; sex workers are workers. Like with athletics, there is potential for elements of labor aristocracy to develop or perpetuate (more than they already have due to regular old imperialism), but that's hardly the fault of the worker getting their 80% from Onlyfans transactions.Says the communist? Suddenly millionaires are cool so long as it's sex work, eh?
So... what?Some of the supposed commies or is it socialists or whatever else etc to stop a moment and go "Hey so maybe the monitisation and commercialisation of sex is going a bit far now".
And I say this as some-one that loves media with sex and violence in it.
You like it when a big company makes bank with sex and violence in a movie or video game, but not when individual workers make money from voluntary transactions? Do you consider it better when the person who is selling the sex or the product which displays sex isn't the person who is having that sex?