As if no one's a realist. I'm a realist.AdeptaSororitas said:Realist: No ones a realist, you are just one of the other choices in disguise.
I think you got the terminology a bit mixed up there, your description there is more in line with a nihilist [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism]; a fatalist [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatalist] is one who believes in fate (and I understand the "fatal" part in "fatalism" implies otherwise).AdeptaSororitas said:Fatalist: Life has no purpose/ People live to die.
AdeptaSororitas said:So I've been lurking the forums of the Escapist for a long time, and I notice the many and varied life views on here. From "Everyone is inherently good" to "There's no fucking purpose to life" And I have to wonder which is the Norm on here my Hypothesis it that it will be Pessimism, but I may be surprised, pleasantly or otherwise.
Heres how I'm framing the choices, simply for my own ease, I fully understand that I may oversimplify or just screw up a definition, just bear with me.
Optimism: Everything will turn out okay/ people are inherently good.
Pessimism: Most things will not end well/ People are dicks.
Realist: No ones a realist, you are just one of the other choices in disguise.
Fatalist: Life has no purpose/ People live to die.
Edit: I feel a bit unfair, I have yet to state my outlook: I'm an Optimist, things can and will improve, and I truly believe that people are good, just misguided or scared.
I would say that constantly expecting the worst is a perennial state of gloom.OmniscientOstrich said:My state of gloom is not perennial, I just hold no expectations for a positive outcome unless there is strong convincing evidence to suggest otherwise and even then it's healthy to have an air of skepticism about you.ultrachicken said:Are you really so afraid of disappointment that you want to spend almost your entire life in a gloom state to avoid it? I've never understood that particular justification for pessimism.OmniscientOstrich said:Pessimist, if you don't have any expectations then you can't be dissapointed, only pleasently surprised.
OT: I believe that some people are good, some are bad, and that there is no way to accurately have knowledge as to how many are in each camp or in the middle ground, so there's no point in trying. Feel free to try lumping me into one of your listed demographics if you want, OP, but I'm certainly not going to.
I'm not afraid of dissapointment
That's a bit of a contradiction. You claim to not be afraid of disappointment, yet simultaneously use the avoidance of disappointment as one of two justifications for your outlook on life.If I can expect the worst possible outcome, then I can prepare for it's repurcussions, pick up the pieces and carry on. If the outcome is positive then the result is all the sweeter.
I think that seeing the entire world as a flower just waiting to blossom, bursting with sunshine and rainbows is unrealistic, but so is thinking of the world as a stream of Satan's molten piss with a few diamonds mixed in (don't look at me like that, we all know Satan has a weird diet). How do you justify this world view? You cannot collect statistics of how often good triumphs over evil, you can only use personal anecdotes and news stations that filter out positive news in favor of negative. Claiming to know so much about humanity from such a limited perspective seems like lying to yourself, to me.I just find optimistic outlooks to be unrealistic. There's good to be found in this world, but it's fairly sparce and I don't see any reason to lie to myself.
This. Aaand I thought I had something to add. Guess not.newwiseman said:Where is the nihilist option?
I'm optimistic in my endeavors, pessimistic of yours. A realist in my dreams, and a fatalist in the face of betrayal.
In short my philosophy is that the human condition is subject to change based on the scenario that the subject is participating in. When life is good, everything is good; When you find out your girlfriend of four years is pregnant with someone else's kid, understandably you can hate the world and everyone in it.
The best I hope for is brief moments of contentment to break up the monotony of my wasted youth, all the while searching for things to waste away with until my years run out and I die.
Well from personal experience, a large percentage of the people I encounter are assholes, I'm miserable and self loathing and I just don't see things working out for me. Maybe your life's just fucking peachy, I can't say, but I don't realistically expect things to improve for me. As for the news, I could mention the thousands of years of atrocities that humanity has committed. But really, all it takes is for people to be indifferent, for their drive to be their avarice, so hears a more modern example. New Orleans is still a dilapited shithole because the investment required to fix it would not be profitable, the people from other states who have to pay the taxes are vastly isolationists and the government doesn't want to donate the billions of dollars necessary to fix a city that will be of no monetary benefit to them. You think if LA or New York got hit by a tornado it'd still look like shit this many years on? Me either. No that's not my sole reason for a pessimistic outlook and this sure as fuck isn't the first time something of this avaricious nature has occurred. I just don't think there are enough altruistically inclined individuals in this world who actually have the power and diligence to significantly change things for the better, if you want to believe otherwise good for you, but I can't.ultrachicken said:snip
So you think anecdotes are actually a valid reason to base your outlook on? That makes no sense.OmniscientOstrich said:Well from personal experience, a large percentage of the people I encounter are assholes, I'm miserable and self loathing and I just don't see things working out for me. Maybe your life's just fucking peachy, I can't say, but I don't realistically expect things to improve for me. As for the news, I could mention the thousands of years of atrocities that humanity has committed. But really, all it takes is for people to be indifferent, for their drive to be their avarice, so hears a more modern example. New Orleans is still a dilapited shithole because the investment required to fix it would not be profitable, the people from other states who have to pay the taxes are vastly isolationists and the government doesn't want to donate the billions of dollars necessary to fix a city that will be of no monetary benefit to them. You think if LA or New York got hit by a tornado it'd still look like shit this many years on? Me either. No that's not my sole reason for a pessimistic outlook and this sure as fuck isn't the first time something of this avaricious nature has occurred. I just don't think there are enough altruistically inclined individuals in this world who actually have the power and diligence to significantly change things for the better, if you want to believe otherwise good for you, but I can't.ultrachicken said:snip