Overpopulation. Resources running out. What do we do about these things?

Recommended Videos

Hero in a half shell

It's not easy being green
Dec 30, 2009
4,286
0
0
First thing that must be solved is the energy crisis, this is possible if a Nuclear Fusion power plant becomes a reality, doubly so if we can phase out fossil fuel dependant cars into electric cars. Then the food shortage and space problems are a little more complex. Certainly in most Western cities our density is really low, when you consider the density Tokyo achieved, so the solution in most places will be to build up, instead of out into the countryside. Food shortages can be countered by careful sustainable methods being used to grow GM food. Of course, actually achieving all this is going to take a lot of new technology, less greedy businesses, and more open consumers.
 

lucky_sharm

New member
Aug 27, 2009
846
0
0
gbemery said:
I thought thats what world war 3 was going to solve. Oh well why not develop nanotech more that way we can infect the world with nanobots and cull the populations where one needs resources or after we cure everything imitate disease to kill people? Hmm maybe I am on to something what if we do develop nanotech and pharmacy companies program them to make us "sick" then sell us the pills to "cure" the symptoms..they would make even more money then they would ever dream of. Ofcourse it might be obvious when 99% of the population has something.
Ehh, I'm not so hyped up about mass genocide. Although it would help the overpopulation problem, I have a feeling that you and I are going to be apart of that huge percentage of humanity erased.
 

Zenron

The Laughing Shadow
May 11, 2010
298
0
0
We'll do what humans always do, kill ourselves off with war and bad decisions.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
lucky_sharm said:
Today, mortality rates have gone down, medicine is becoming more advanced and effective than it used to be, and less people are dying overall. But now we have the issue of housing and sustaining more and more people everyday, and our Earth might not last forever. Do we have any solutions to these very troubling problems?
There is only one solution, and that is to get rid of people, and that is one of the reasons why I'm a major militant who sees war as the most viable solution to most of today's big issues, especially since we're heading there anyway.

I'm ironically both a realist and a romantic. I'm a romantic because I believe in the long term we can get into space, and obtain more resources and living space. We already have the tech to begin terraforming mars by all accounts, an we know there are minerals in the astroid belt, so we can at least obtain those pretty easily. I'm a realist because I believe that in order to do that, we need to get earth into a position where it's viable. That means we need a world unity, that is a single global goverment and culture everyone belongs to, no exceptions. The reason being that as long as there are factions paranoia is going to prevent much space development due to the constant fear of what the other guy is doing up there, we have tons of that right now, and mistrust is one of the reasons why the US hasn't invested more in space, because it's quite frankly considered antagonistic (along with the other reasons). A world unity of course is not going to come without massive warfare and bloodshed, because simply put a lot of people and cultures are not going to be willing to dissolve, give up self rule, and other things. That's all fine, since the world is overpopulated and wiping out 95% of the people doesn't matter as long as the 5% left are unified. Less people also means the oppertunity to control our population growth, and maintain a high standard of living while not overreaching what the plnaet can support, as we gradually work on obtaining enough space to extent our population and obtain the resources to support them.

To be honest I think there is no really "good" solution to these problems, everything I've said about my personal attitudes aside. We need less people, and simply put we don't have the time for a gradual reduction of the population, we're going to deplete the planet long before we can slowly bring the population down to what it can susptain. Right now we're talking about running out of things like wood and oil within a couple of decades, never mind the hundreds of years nessicary for a slow "natural" population reduction of a species that
lives 80 years or more. We're at a point where it's not a problem people can say "well that's something for future generations to worry about".

I think about these problems every time I suggest something like going to war with China or how we should deal with "The Middle East". People, usually left wingers, will go on morally about "oh, but think of the millions who will die", or "you can't just exterminate 1.5 billion people!!11!!!one!", but then again when I suggest this I'm also looking at global overpopulation and the fact that by definition we need to get rid of billions and I can pretty easily stick to my guns. When you look at the actual situation, people like me are actually the most sane ones out there, since in the end we are going to have to get rid of vast amounts of the population. I'd rather have it happen due to fighting over important things, than say someone deciding to try and implement a "Twilight Zone" like culling lottery. We knew a century or more ago that we had to embrace Zero Population Growth, and well... now we're paying that price.

I have romantic goals, and believe humanity can eventually get to a point where it can colonize and expand it's population as much as it wants to, but I'm a realist enough to realize that to get to that point we have some massively ugly and immoral work that has to happen here on earth before that even becomes possible.

I can reconcile such thoughts with by belief in a higher power and so on, simply due to the fact that we've been waiting for some kind of magical solution to present itself, but it never has. Thus, obviously we're supposed to deal with thisproblem as ugly as it may be. If God, or some alien race intervenes and makes it so we don't have to deal with this, so be it. Short of that... well, we have to come to grips with the simple fact that we'e looking at a mandatory bloodbath. Reality having caught up with morality and showing that we progressed morally well ahead of our time and our abillity to sustain a lot of those ideas.

It's all very depressing to contemplate, and truthfully I've been sort of hoping we'd see more attention paid to the big picture.
 

Strixvaliano

New member
Feb 8, 2011
195
0
0
Give serial killers a bit of slack? It seems grisly but they tend to help thin down the herd a bit.

Other then that I guess parents could spay and neuter their pets children.

Alrighty, all joking aside why not allow doctors to perform euthanasia on patient's who have no mind, are to far gone, or are suffering horrendously with no cure or chance of recovery.

It's a little off to compare a human with a pet but I will use one of my pets as an example. I had a pet rat that developed a tumor (high chance in rats), due to her age I had three choices... let her live with it, euthanize her, or perform an operation to remove it which would have probably killed her anyway due to her age.

Long story short, I decided to let her live with it because she was showing no signs of pain, was still highly mobile, still played and still ate perfectly fine. I switched up her diet to try and help slow the growth of the tumor a bit. If I saw any signs of her being sluggish, not eating, not getting up, or any signs of pain I would have had her euthanized then to keep her around out of my own selfishness. It never came to that because she died in her sleep one night, I'm assuming from old age. (When I got her she was already a bit over the typical life span of a rat.)
 

LaughingAtlas

New member
Nov 18, 2009
873
0
0
I'm thinking if we never get space colonies going, we end up like the Drell. (that's two Mass Effect references so far, I think)
 

Byere

New member
Jan 8, 2009
730
0
0
Ok, I know it's probably already been said by many people... but if you want to kill two birds with one stone, let the hungry eat the homeless!

Shockolate said:
I didn't say it was a good idea.
Neither did I...

More seriously, I agree on the 1 child per family rule like what China has. 0 children in some cases is very tempting too. As for other problems like lacking resources, we need to look on alternate sources that might SEEM weird. For example:
and

I particularly like this video. It's a home-made distillery that can melt down any type of plastic and convert it back into base oil. Even though it's still using a fossil fuel, it's better than just throwing away your old soda/milk bottles and all that useless packaging used for meats and produce...

Seriously. If we're going to recycle, we (as a species) have to get serious about it. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if these methods and abilities have been shunned because some corperate sleeze couldn't use it to make a profit.
 

bjj hero

New member
Feb 4, 2009
3,180
0
0
This came up at the turn of the 20th century. People were worried about mass starvation due to population increase. As it is we had the green revolution where advancements in agriculture meant we could produce far more food with similar amounts of space.

For those wanting to apply a 1 child rule, see what happens when you are old and you want to retire but there are too few workers to support you.

Human advancement and ingenuity will stop us ending up living like Mad Max.
 

Uber Evil

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,108
0
0
Radeonx said:
The first thing that came to mind was killing the super old people who don't really contribute much to society as a whole. All they do is use up resources, and it would benefit us greatly in terms of practicality to kill them.
With that said, it would be incredibly doucehy and heartless.
Yes, but I can see why that could be used.
OT: Maybe some form of population control in the same vein as the Chinese, except less crappy.
 

shadowslayer81

New member
May 9, 2011
151
0
0
bjj hero said:
For those wanting to apply a 1 child rule, see what happens when you are old and you want to retire but there are too few workers to support you.
The other problem with the 1 Child rule is that everyone wants a boy.
 

thisbymaster

New member
Sep 10, 2008
373
0
0
The larger the population the larger the effect of diseases and natural disasters. I think your question is more, how we curb everyone else and leave me alone? This sort of thing is going to require everyone to change in the first world to the third world. We need to stop pollution, everywhere. Which means that nuclear power is out, that nuclear waste isn't going to just disappear. We need solar, hydro and geothermal. We need to have bio waste recycling programs put in place world wide. We can turn excrement and plant byproducts into oil by cooking and pressurizing it. All logging needs to be done in a cycle so the land has time to recover and allow for fires. Mining waste needs to be dealt with better, right now gold mining is completely noneffective, for every ounce of gold takes somewhere around 23 tons of rock leeched with arsenic. I think it would make more sense to start mining our old waste dumps, there are lots of gold silver and not to mention steel, oil, copper in the dumps. On the old waste sites idea, I drive by one that has been turned into a park it has tubes all over the place to release the methane created inside it, why not put a power plant next to it and burn the methane for power? Just a few ideas.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
lucky_sharm said:
Today, mortality rates have gone down, medicine is becoming more advanced and effective than it used to be, and less people are dying overall. But now we have the issue of housing and sustaining more and more people everyday, and our Earth might not last forever. Do we have any solutions to these very troubling problems?
Yeah, same ones we always have. Starvation, disease, and war. There is already a great deal of starvation and minor conflict, and many diseases exist which would be devastating if they managed to get into an international airport. Many of us will start dieing somehow eventually, it's the way nature works.
 

Blatherscythe

New member
Oct 14, 2009
2,217
0
0
First we should adopt the 1 child per family thing China has but make it mandatory to raise said child if they are not severely mentally or physically handicapped and none of that abandon it if it's a girl crap. Make abortions legal and easy to access, as well as birth control and condoms etc. Ration our reasources strictly and focus our research and technology on finding another planet to live on. If we cannot do that then we will have to remove the old, the sick and the handicapped, starting with Ted Turner, just for the irony.

It's not a pretty or nice thing when it comes to survival. Morals are thrown out the window and logic takes over. At least a quick death is better than one by starvation.
 

EPolleys

New member
May 12, 2010
117
0
0
Space travel, seriously the day no human on earth wants to go to space is the day we are doomed.