Fair enough, I see your point. I know it's not really making enough money for a sequel to be terribly likely, but at this point I'd just like one of del Toro's movies to actually do well so he can get his other projects off the ground - I'm stupidly excited about the possibility of his Dark Universe movie about DC's magic-themed characters.ItouKaiji said:Well, okay, I could amend to say it's a financial disaster from the point of view of the studios and executives that actually pay the money to have the movie made. The bottom line is doing better than expected in the foreign markets isn't going to cut it when the movie needs to make twice it's budget to be considered a success. For the people paying for the movie a loss is a loss and they just aren't going to throw the money behind a sequel, unless it's significantly scaled down to lessen the risk, and if you get rid of the pure spectacle then what's really left? I don't think anyone that enjoyed the movie is going to say the plot and characters could carry a movie.
It's a lot like the situation of AAA video games now. Call of Duty sells six million units so stockholders throw money at projects and games that move millions of units are considered to be disappointments. It's the same with blockbuster movies. Studios are throwing hundreds of millions at these movies and then expecting them to make Avengers money when that's just never going to happen, so even when a movie does better than expected it's not good enough. Can anyone really believe that RIPD cost 180 million to make? And they actually expected to profit from that? Same thing with the Lone Ranger, a stupid amount of money to make and no way it was ever going to make it back. Now, Rim is better than both of those turds, but I think it would have benefited from being given a more modest budget and then when that does well and it's got name recognition they would be more willing to throw money at a flashy sequel with all the bells and whistles. But that would have required a stronger script and more world building and then blowing their wad on just the most impressive set pieces they could afford.
But it is what is is and unfortunately I think Pacific Rim is going to be a one of a kind movie that we won't seeing something like it again any time soon because of inflated expectation for what was always going to be a niche movie. And you're right I was kind of harsh on the movie, but I do tend to be very critical of even the things I like. And I actually did enjoy the movie, I just don't think it was quite as ground breaking as some people find it.
And there's certainly no denying that Pacific Rim's characters couldn't carry the film on their own. For me, it was all about the spectacle: it wasn't even a little bit ground-breaking, I just enjoyed watching giant robots beat up giant monsters as directed by a guy who was clearly in love with the idea. Sometimes, that's enough. Although, clearly not for most audiences.