dogstile said:
The Great JT said:
Ubisoft, you're not helping the video game industry look like you're appealing to a mature audience. You're making us look like children and sex criminals. I can understand you want to appeal to an older audience and make sort of a for-adults sexy board game, I get that. But in case you haven't noticed, video games have kind of an image problem right now, and a game such as We Dare isn't going to help that.
Extra Credits watcher, i'll bet a fiver on it. I'm going to go ahead and steal your writing style to make my point.
The Great JT, you're not helping the gaming community look like we're a mature audience. You're actually making us seem like we're not mature enough to handle something like this. I can understand you care about the industry and want to improve our image, I get that. But in case you haven't noticed, video games have kind of an image problem right now, which is that we're not mature enough to handle mature game, and saying that we dare isn't good enough for the gaming community isn't going to help that.
In defence of the great JT, I think his problem might lie with the way ubisoft have marketed it as opposed to the game itself, it just looks bad, the same way the dead space 2 "your mom will hate it" advert, and because all of the Fox news-eseque supporters believe that video games are ONLY for children, and that this game is on the Wii, then they must be peddeling it to kids. If they'd just released the game and said "Yeah this is like a spin the bottle for adults on the Wii" as opposed to making a precursor to an orgy, this may have gone down better, as it looks like they're trying to be shocking for the sake of it.
I'm a fan of video games being an accepted medium, and I have no problem with this game, it's existed before in other mediums, abet it seems a bit superflous when you could just play spin the bottle, and no one ever tried to market that as an orgy inducing game. It's like they're marketing it to adults and teens at the same time, as Adults are not going to play this, as the sorts of people (ie swingers) are already going to be doing this and don't need a wii to make it happen, so the only sort of people this is going to appeal to are people not old enough to appreciate sex maturely. Now being like that at 13+ isnt a bad thing, we all went through it, but the trailer just seems to work more towards teens than adults.
Trogdor1138 said:
dogstile said:
The Great JT said:
Ubisoft, you're not helping the video game industry look like you're appealing to a mature audience. You're making us look like children and sex criminals. I can understand you want to appeal to an older audience and make sort of a for-adults sexy board game, I get that. But in case you haven't noticed, video games have kind of an image problem right now, and a game such as We Dare isn't going to help that.
Extra Credits watcher, i'll bet a fiver on it. I'm going to go ahead and steal your writing style to make my point.
The Great JT, you're not helping the gaming community look like we're a mature audience. You're actually making us seem like we're not mature enough to handle something like this. I can understand you care about the industry and want to improve our image, I get that. But in case you haven't noticed, video games have kind of an image problem right now, which is that we're not mature enough to handle mature game, and saying that we dare isn't good enough for the gaming community isn't going to help that.
*claps*
That was great
I've always thought the best way to improve the image of gaming is funnily enough not try and improve it. It just makes us look pretentious and desperate for the entire world to accept our hobby. I'm still on the fence about EC, I've liked some of their episodes but I felt others have had very flawed arguments and take themselves way too seriously. Gaming is a passion, but we just need to relax about it.
I think it's just because they don't have enough time to really explain everything, alot of their episodes could be decent mini essays, but they've only got 8 minutes to get through it, so they have to leave out a lot of stuff, if you check out some of the written stuff (ala Extra punctuation), you can see their point a bit more. Their intentions are good, and obviously the genuinely want to see the medium evolve, it's no worse than anyone else who believes that, it's just got a physical voice, and a lot of their points are very good.
It's just like myself they get annoyed at the fact that we live in the 21st century where we've demonized DnD, music, (dating back to the Blues for fuck sake), movies, books and any other medium that comes across, and by now I expect the world to think "oh yes last time we demonized something it was pretty fucking stupid" and just leave video games alone to develop on their own.