--- Warning: Complex Text Approaching ---
Greyfox105 said:
People are stupid. A person is smart.
On their own, a person can be smart. As part of a crowd, they lose that. They become one of the people.
wolf92 said:
People are a collection, and as a collection they are prone to mass hysteria and general ignorance.
I would like to argue against this generalized statement. People might be prone to these kinds of things in "small" groups (up to 1000 people maybe). But, after all, we were able to build working nation states, develop science and a distinct codified moral compass (i.e. the human rights) all just BECAUSE of the plurality of people i.e. through collectives of
millions of people.
As such I would dare to say that this "curve of stupidity" is not linear in the number of persons but rather of a more Gaussian form: "stupidity" in the broadest sense being not applicable to the individual and not to big collectives but rather to smaller groups only.
-----
Now to the actual OP: You are right. The Generalization that "people are stupid" is illegitimate. One has to specify exactly what is meant with "the people" (as seen in the first part of my post) and "stupidity".
In my own experience, I would say the origin of the mostly perceived "stupidity" is of the third kind the OP mentioned: It is difficult to assess the complexity of the world and stay aware of possible outcomes of ones actions. "Stupidity" is then just not being able to see a possible outcome and acting in a destructive/harmful way without ever realizing it. I'd say that this is not actual stupidity as this can very well be accidental. What I would define as "stupid", however, is
denying the complexity and usher pointless and bland generalizations without the slightest sliver of doubt. One thing that is especially prone to this kind of idiocy is self perception. Another being "knowledge" out of experience: it usually wins over knowledge based on scientific developments, especially if it contradicts your own experience.
This behaviour might be either due to social pressure (ignorance being positively rewarded by acceptance of like minded individuals and thus amplified - a sort of vicious circle of ignorance, if you like), inherent lack of some sort of social intelligence (lacking perception of morality) or difficulties with thinking outside the box and accepting different opinions (close-mindedness).
The only real solution to that is just one thing: communication. If people communicate they will come in contact with differing opinions and might accept differing opinions, reducing ignorance and violence. In my opinion, increased communication is what brought the world as far as it is today and, with the new means of communication (like the internet), we might even get farther. I certainly hope so
