PETA does it again: Unhappy Meals!

Recommended Videos

TikiShades

New member
May 6, 2009
535
0
0
...Seriously guys. Besides the fact that they do it in a stupid way, they DO bring up a point. safer methods for killing a chicken, which might cost a barely noticeable difference to a big wig like McDonalds.

And the people who work at KFC factories usually abuse the chickens. Nothing at all to do with cooking them. Grinding their beaks against wood, kicking them around like a soccer ball, bashing them apart... You forget that there's always reasoning for chaos. You shouldn't ignore everything, because a lot of the time they have a reason. You should at least see why they're doing what their new stunt is, especially if they mention it in a 2 paragraph article linked in the OP. Not everyone in PETA is a nutcase.

Though, this thread did show me a reason why I like this site. There were people who actually read the damn thing and saw they brought up a good point.
 

magnuslion

New member
Jun 16, 2009
898
0
0
lizards said:
magnuslion said:
PurpleRain said:
ZSF said:
Titanguy654 said:
I am now in epic rage mode.
Why?

magnuslion said:
((yawns))
Oh god, really? This sickens me no end. You have an alternate viewpoint and you don't give a damn, and if anything act more childish? Ugh.

bob-2000 said:
goddamn it, PETA, first that weird "cooking mama" spoof (the one where the eggs bleed) and now this.


I love it that the key word here was 'spoof' and yet you ignore it at the same time.
what seems childish to me is that you clearly champion PETA and yet claim not too. you are pissed because I think that intrinsically your organization is full of shit. and no, you are not going to change my view point. I have seen first hand what these bastards can do, because we shut down one of there kill shelters in my home community after they put 3 litters ((about 17 dogs)) of perfectley healthy puppies to death after they could'nt find them a "suitable" home within a week. ((suitable=income over 100,000 dollars a year that could pay their exorbitant adoption fees))
Personally, I would like to take every Peta member to southern mexico to the jungle for a week, and see how much they love animals after they have been stalked by panthers, bitten by snakes, stung by various insects and had poo flung at them by monkey's.

That is all.
so do you hate cops to?

because cops peppered sprayed this one guy once and it was overkill

man really get a real arguement "o they did something in my town" thats a shitty arguement your just angry that somebody disagrees with you and you cant take it
so what you, another obvious Peta defendant, are arguing is that personal experience is invalid.
/Yawn
/Getalife
/done
 

Neesa

New member
Jan 29, 2009
510
0
0
A few reasons why I have no respect for PETA:

1) PETA president and co-founder Ingrid Newkirk has described her group's overall goal as "total animal liberation." This means no meat, no milk, no zoos, no circuses, no wool, no leather, no hunting, no fishing, and no pets (not even seeing-eye dogs). PETA is also against all medical research that requires the use of animals.

2) Despite its constant moralizing about the "unethical" treatment of animals by restaurant owners, grocers, farmers, scientists, anglers, and countless other Americans, PETA has killed over 14,400 dogs and cats at its Norfolk, Virginia headquarters. During 2005, PETA put to death over 90 percent of the animals it collected from members of the public.

3) PETA has given tens of thousands of dollars to convicted arsonists and other violent criminals. This includes a 2001 donation of $1,500 to the North American Earth Liberation Front (ELF), an FBI-certified "domestic terrorist" group responsible for dozens of firebombs and death threats. During the 1990s, PETA paid $70,200 to an Animal Liberation Front (ALF) activist convicted of burning down a Michigan State University research laboratory. In his sentencing recommendation, a federal prosecutor implicated PETA president Ingrid Newkirk in that crime. And PETA vegetarian campaign coordinator Bruce Friedrich told an animal rights convention in 2001 that "blowing stuff up and smashing windows" is "a great way to bring about animal liberation."

4) PETA activists regularly target children as young as six years old with anti-meat and anti-milk propaganda, often waiting outside their schools to intercept them as they walk to and from class-without notifying parents. One piece of kid-targeted PETA literature tells small children: "Your Mommy Kills Animals!" PETA brags that its messages reach over 2 million children every year, including thousands reached by e-mail without the permission of their parents. One PETA vice president told the Fox News Channel's audience: "Our campaigns are always geared towards children, and they always will be."

5) PETA has used a related organization, the PETA Foundation, to fund the misnamed Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), a deceptive animal rights group that promotes itself as an unbiased source of medical and nutritional information. PCRM's president also serves as president of the PETA Foundation.

6) PETA runs campaigns seemingly calculated to offend religious believers. One entire PETA website is devoted to the claim-despite ample evidence to the contrary-that Jesus Christ was a vegetarian. PETA holds protests at houses of worship, even suing one church that tried to protect its members from Sunday-morning harassment. Its billboards taunt Christians with the message that hogs "died for their sins." PETA insists, contrary to centuries of rabbinical teaching, that the Jewish ritual of kosher slaughter shouldn't be allowed. And its infamous "Holocaust on Your Plate" campaign crassly compares the Jewish victims of Nazi genocide with farm animals.

7) PETA has repeatedly attacked research foundations like the March of Dimes, the Pediatric AIDS Foundation, and the American Cancer Society, because they support animal-based research that might uncover cures for birth defects and life-threatening diseases. PETA president Ingrid Newkirk has said that "even if animal research resulted in a cure for AIDS, we would be against it."
Source [http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/consumer-freedom012807.htm]

- Peta Kills Animals [http://www.petakillsanimals.com/]

Their methods are completely mind boggling. Hell, they even use obese women [http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/08/peta-save-the-wales-billboard.php] in their ad campaigns.

Not to mention their stunt for their Super Bowl ad [http://www.peta.org/content/standalone/veggielove/Default.aspx] that didn't air due to content. C'mon, you make fun of women for being obese and call them whales... Then you objectify them to try to draw the male population to put down the chicken wing and pick up a celery stick. Why? Because "Studies shows that vegetarians have better sex. Then damn, I must be doing something wrong. Oh silly me for being a carnivore. -slaps wrist-

If you want to make your point across to the normal meat eating American, this isn't the way to do it. Most people are set in their eating ways unless some life changing experience happens. PETA's just as bad as extremist terrorist. Both in America and everywhere around the world that has terrorist. Last time I checked, isn't PETA on the FBI's most wanted list? [http://scienceblogs.com/drugmonkey/2009/04/fbi_places_alleged_ara_terrori.php] Congratulations PETA. If this is how you want people to view some of your supporters [http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/tersandiego_da.htm], then by golly, what McDonalds is doing to chickens isn't 1/2 as bad as what you guys are doing.

OT: I'm still not surprised by this stunt... Sometimes being over the top gets you nowhere but a pat on the back and perhaps a "Nice try."
 

TikiShades

New member
May 6, 2009
535
0
0
magnuslion said:
lizards said:
magnuslion said:
PurpleRain said:
ZSF said:
Titanguy654 said:
I am now in epic rage mode.
Why?

magnuslion said:
((yawns))
Oh god, really? This sickens me no end. You have an alternate viewpoint and you don't give a damn, and if anything act more childish? Ugh.

bob-2000 said:
goddamn it, PETA, first that weird "cooking mama" spoof (the one where the eggs bleed) and now this.


I love it that the key word here was 'spoof' and yet you ignore it at the same time.
what seems childish to me is that you clearly champion PETA and yet claim not too. you are pissed because I think that intrinsically your organization is full of shit. and no, you are not going to change my view point. I have seen first hand what these bastards can do, because we shut down one of there kill shelters in my home community after they put 3 litters ((about 17 dogs)) of perfectley healthy puppies to death after they could'nt find them a "suitable" home within a week. ((suitable=income over 100,000 dollars a year that could pay their exorbitant adoption fees))
Personally, I would like to take every Peta member to southern mexico to the jungle for a week, and see how much they love animals after they have been stalked by panthers, bitten by snakes, stung by various insects and had poo flung at them by monkey's.

That is all.
so do you hate cops to?

because cops peppered sprayed this one guy once and it was overkill

man really get a real arguement "o they did something in my town" thats a shitty arguement your just angry that somebody disagrees with you and you cant take it
so what you, another obvious Peta defendant, are arguing is that personal experience is invalid.
/Yawn
/Getalife
/done
so what you, another obvious biased Peta basher, thinks every member of PETA is responsible for everything PETA does.

/yawn
/idiot
/dismiss
 

Galletea

Inexplicably Awesome
Sep 27, 2008
2,877
0
0
I think this thread shows quite well the problem with PETA. Even though some of the points they make are valid, they're snowed under by the idiocy. Things like the "Sea Kitten" thing, and demanding that animals be killed rather than hand reared, put a negative bias on anything they tell you.
 

PurpleRain

New member
Dec 2, 2007
5,001
0
0
TikiShades said:
so what you, another obvious biased Peta basher, thinks every member of PETA is responsible for everything PETA does.

/yawn
/idiot
/dismiss
Thank you. So so much. How can people be so brainwashed and so hypocritical?

shadowstriker86 said:
Peta = People Eating Tasty Animals.
Hilarious the first thousand times on the Escapist.

Ninja_X said:
Ah I see.

I classify an animal as stupid when it has basically no survival instinct.

Chickens don't really have any. That is mostly because of how much they have been domesticated but chickens cannot survive in the wild anymore.

We grow and eat them because that is all they are good for. They cannot survive on their own. An animal that cannot survive in the wild any longer should go extinct. But they don't and the only reason there are still chickens is because we eat them.
But they do have survival instincts. Without it would be self destructive to the animal. Also, they cannot live in the wild because it is OUR wild. They are more native to North Africa or the Middle East. Point is, they should be a lot more adapt to live in that environment.

Infernai said:
..Can't PETA go drown in a vat of acid already or something? -_-
Why again? Stop being hateful without reason. They're not burning down your house.
 

Ninja_X

New member
Aug 9, 2009
616
0
0
But they do have survival instincts. Without it would be self destructive to the animal. Also, they cannot live in the wild because it is OUR wild. They are more native to North Africa or the Middle East. Point is, they should be a lot more adapt to live in that environment.
They do not.

Release a domesticated chicken into the wild and it will die very soon because years of being a farm animal has stripped the common chicken of most of its brains and survival instincts.

Its fact. Most chickens cannot survive unless on a farm.
 

PurpleRain

New member
Dec 2, 2007
5,001
0
0
magnuslion said:
hahahahahahaaaaaaaa!! bet that is how a lot of Nazis thought. It helps ease the pain of their sick actions, does'nt it.

not one of you has put forth a valid argument other than "stop being so hateful". Too which my most constructive and nice thoughts are something along the lines of "I will stop being hateful when they stop slaughtering puppies and kittens".
you eugenicists are the least likely to survive in a survival of the fittest scenario, so I am not sure why you put forth such a philosophy.
Okay, dude. I'm still not sure why you haven't been banned. Stop acting like this! I've already explained the puppy thing and still you've ignored it. And now you've resorted to calling people Nazi's without even caring for alternate view points. You're so so stubborn of your own point of view you attack any other alien arguments or ignore them.

GROW UP! Really!

He put forth his scenario because you are still acting like a child even though people have given you things to argue about!
 

lizards

New member
Jan 20, 2009
1,159
0
0
magnuslion said:
lizards said:
magnuslion said:
PurpleRain said:
ZSF said:
Titanguy654 said:
I am now in epic rage mode.
Why?

magnuslion said:
((yawns))
Oh god, really? This sickens me no end. You have an alternate viewpoint and you don't give a damn, and if anything act more childish? Ugh.

bob-2000 said:
goddamn it, PETA, first that weird "cooking mama" spoof (the one where the eggs bleed) and now this.


I love it that the key word here was 'spoof' and yet you ignore it at the same time.
what seems childish to me is that you clearly champion PETA and yet claim not too. you are pissed because I think that intrinsically your organization is full of shit. and no, you are not going to change my view point. I have seen first hand what these bastards can do, because we shut down one of there kill shelters in my home community after they put 3 litters ((about 17 dogs)) of perfectley healthy puppies to death after they could'nt find them a "suitable" home within a week. ((suitable=income over 100,000 dollars a year that could pay their exorbitant adoption fees))
Personally, I would like to take every Peta member to southern mexico to the jungle for a week, and see how much they love animals after they have been stalked by panthers, bitten by snakes, stung by various insects and had poo flung at them by monkey's.

That is all.
so do you hate cops to?

because cops peppered sprayed this one guy once and it was overkill

man really get a real arguement "o they did something in my town" thats a shitty arguement your just angry that somebody disagrees with you and you cant take it
so what you, another obvious Peta defendant, are arguing is that personal experience is invalid.
/Yawn
/Getalife
/done
ah good arguement but no look at some other peta threads and im right along with them saying how that was fucking stupid and how does any of that relate to "get a life"? are you that spent on insults you just default back to that tired internet insult

stop bashing what you know shit about
 

lizards

New member
Jan 20, 2009
1,159
0
0
Ninja_X said:
lizards said:
Ninja_X said:
PurpleRain said:
Ninja_X said:
lizards said:
Ninja_X said:
lizards said:
Ninja_X said:
EchetusXe said:
Ninja_X said:
Blackdoom said:
I don't understand what they are complaining about, cruelty is what makes the food taste so good.
Cows and chickens are to retarded to suffer.

Before anyone says otherwise, go meet a farm animal. They are fucking stupid.
Your saying we can torture retarded humans and that is fine because they are retarded and therefore can't suffer?
Humans taste bad.

In all seriousness, it seems like PETA is just upset that Macdonald's isn't using the PETA approved method of humanely killing the animals.

But they don't say much about the method that Macdonald's IS using. I'm pretty sure Macdonald's is humane enough with its food otherwise a real government agency would shut them down by now.
sigh i was going to argue with you but apparently you did not watch the video or maybe you didnt pay attention either way you have convinced me you are thick and argueing will have no effect
WoW that was rude and uncalled for.

And yes I failed to notice the video link, just read the article. My bad, but still.

So you are right, Macdonald's suppliers are unnecessarily cruel to those chickens.

But we are talking about an animal that can live for an hour without its head, thats how little it uses its brain.
so? is it alright to cut a dogs tail off because it doesnt use it much? no its not

thats a bad arguement
The difference is a chicken can barely feel it.
A chicken can live for an hour without its head? A chicken can barely feel it (pain)? What on earth are you talking about? A chicken dies after its head is chopped off. To say it doesn't is moronic. It can still run around because of nerves jolting in its body. Would you say a human can live after its head is chopped off? It can still excrement and grow hair.

Also, what on earth are you talking about that a chicken can barely feel it? I assume 'it' is pain, because I'm sure, with the same nervous system, they can feel it on a similar level. You have no feeling or care for battery hens or the crappy conditions they are put through. If it were a human it would be considered torture. Why is it different because the animal can't speak?
Didn't I already say I missed the vid, had just read it and admitted that the suppliers where unnecessarily cruel? Why are you still digging at me?

Oh well, I still maintain that chickens are stupid. As for my points, I am to tired to go into it much, but weather or not the animal could speak never factored into my argument.
i see so we can rip the organs out of sepa patients because "they will barely feel it"
No, human beings>>>>>>>>>>>>>chickens.
why?

give me one good reason why chickens arent as good as us
 

PurpleRain

New member
Dec 2, 2007
5,001
0
0
lizards said:
ah good arguement but no look at some other peta threads and im right along with them saying how that was fucking stupid and how does any of that relate to "get a life"? are you that spent on insults you just default back to that tired internet insult

stop bashing what you know shit about
Glad to see someone here with a brain and that can think for themselves.
 

Ninja_X

New member
Aug 9, 2009
616
0
0
lizards said:
Ninja_X said:
lizards said:
Ninja_X said:
PurpleRain said:
Ninja_X said:
lizards said:
Ninja_X said:
lizards said:
Ninja_X said:
EchetusXe said:
Ninja_X said:
Blackdoom said:
I don't understand what they are complaining about, cruelty is what makes the food taste so good.
Cows and chickens are to retarded to suffer.

Before anyone says otherwise, go meet a farm animal. They are fucking stupid.
Your saying we can torture retarded humans and that is fine because they are retarded and therefore can't suffer?
Humans taste bad.

In all seriousness, it seems like PETA is just upset that Macdonald's isn't using the PETA approved method of humanely killing the animals.

But they don't say much about the method that Macdonald's IS using. I'm pretty sure Macdonald's is humane enough with its food otherwise a real government agency would shut them down by now.
sigh i was going to argue with you but apparently you did not watch the video or maybe you didnt pay attention either way you have convinced me you are thick and argueing will have no effect
WoW that was rude and uncalled for.

And yes I failed to notice the video link, just read the article. My bad, but still.

So you are right, Macdonald's suppliers are unnecessarily cruel to those chickens.

But we are talking about an animal that can live for an hour without its head, thats how little it uses its brain.
so? is it alright to cut a dogs tail off because it doesnt use it much? no its not

thats a bad arguement
The difference is a chicken can barely feel it.
A chicken can live for an hour without its head? A chicken can barely feel it (pain)? What on earth are you talking about? A chicken dies after its head is chopped off. To say it doesn't is moronic. It can still run around because of nerves jolting in its body. Would you say a human can live after its head is chopped off? It can still excrement and grow hair.

Also, what on earth are you talking about that a chicken can barely feel it? I assume 'it' is pain, because I'm sure, with the same nervous system, they can feel it on a similar level. You have no feeling or care for battery hens or the crappy conditions they are put through. If it were a human it would be considered torture. Why is it different because the animal can't speak?
Didn't I already say I missed the vid, had just read it and admitted that the suppliers where unnecessarily cruel? Why are you still digging at me?

Oh well, I still maintain that chickens are stupid. As for my points, I am to tired to go into it much, but weather or not the animal could speak never factored into my argument.
i see so we can rip the organs out of sepa patients because "they will barely feel it"
No, human beings>>>>>>>>>>>>>chickens.
why?

give me one good reason why chickens arent as good as us
Survival of the fittest. They could not live without us raising them on farms, they are only kept around by us in order to get eggs and meat off them.
 

Lord George

New member
Aug 25, 2008
2,734
0
0
lizards said:
Ninja_X said:
lizards said:
Ninja_X said:
PurpleRain said:
Ninja_X said:
lizards said:
Ninja_X said:
lizards said:
Ninja_X said:
EchetusXe said:
Ninja_X said:
Blackdoom said:
I don't understand what they are complaining about, cruelty is what makes the food taste so good.
Cows and chickens are to retarded to suffer.

Before anyone says otherwise, go meet a farm animal. They are fucking stupid.
Your saying we can torture retarded humans and that is fine because they are retarded and therefore can't suffer?
Humans taste bad.

In all seriousness, it seems like PETA is just upset that Macdonald's isn't using the PETA approved method of humanely killing the animals.

But they don't say much about the method that Macdonald's IS using. I'm pretty sure Macdonald's is humane enough with its food otherwise a real government agency would shut them down by now.
sigh i was going to argue with you but apparently you did not watch the video or maybe you didnt pay attention either way you have convinced me you are thick and argueing will have no effect
WoW that was rude and uncalled for.

And yes I failed to notice the video link, just read the article. My bad, but still.

So you are right, Macdonald's suppliers are unnecessarily cruel to those chickens.

But we are talking about an animal that can live for an hour without its head, thats how little it uses its brain.
so? is it alright to cut a dogs tail off because it doesnt use it much? no its not

thats a bad arguement
The difference is a chicken can barely feel it.
A chicken can live for an hour without its head? A chicken can barely feel it (pain)? What on earth are you talking about? A chicken dies after its head is chopped off. To say it doesn't is moronic. It can still run around because of nerves jolting in its body. Would you say a human can live after its head is chopped off? It can still excrement and grow hair.

Also, what on earth are you talking about that a chicken can barely feel it? I assume 'it' is pain, because I'm sure, with the same nervous system, they can feel it on a similar level. You have no feeling or care for battery hens or the crappy conditions they are put through. If it were a human it would be considered torture. Why is it different because the animal can't speak?
Didn't I already say I missed the vid, had just read it and admitted that the suppliers where unnecessarily cruel? Why are you still digging at me?

Oh well, I still maintain that chickens are stupid. As for my points, I am to tired to go into it much, but weather or not the animal could speak never factored into my argument.
i see so we can rip the organs out of sepa patients because "they will barely feel it"
No, human beings>>>>>>>>>>>>>chickens.
why?

give me one good reason why chickens arent as good as us
They can't fly. We can. They can't open doorhandles. We can.

Seriously the chicken has basically evolved to be tasty and defenceless, its like nature wants us to eat it, and who am I to argue with nature.
 

KaiRai

New member
Jun 2, 2008
2,145
0
0
Well if they're so moral they should stop killing plants to make their food!

Seriously, it's like they're just doing stuff for attention without having any realistic goals. MacDonalds will never stop making burgers because they've used a bit of wordplay.