I'm not entirely sure what you're getting at here. Are you saying that evolutionary progress ends with the advent of an intelligent mind? That an intelligent mind is what current evolutionary selection pressure favours? Or that modern society defeats the evolutionary process?omicron1 said:The advent of the intelligent mind is of necessity the end of significant evolutionary progress, as societal standards, rather than the ability to obtain food or any other genetic characteristic, now determine mating interests.
Hookay...FrostyChick said:I am not the sexiest person alive.
Now, your move. :3
Being able to come up with counterarguments is hardly a difficult task. I imagine most people do it every day when they have to make decisions.James Joseph Emerald said:You're actually quite clever, and your ability to come up with a reasonably plausible counter-argument to almost everything is fairly impressive. With all that wit, you must get all the girls. Or, at the very least, you can hold a conversation without boring all the participants into a stupor. Also, I'm willing to bet your intelligence is above average.
/research timeLionsfan said:Removing the two-line offsides pass (using the redline as a basis) in the NHL has led to more scoring chances.
Most of my threads go nowhere, are redundant and derivative and end with me confirming that attempting any poll on the Escapist will give you the mother of all sampling biases.Louie Clark said:You are an amazing person who posts great threads and everyone likes you. That's my stance on this topic.
That is something that can never be proven.Torrasque said:Oooo I am bookmarking this to read later, it shall provide plenty of luls.
Hmmm... Oh wow, I'm surprised no one has tackled this one yet:
God does not exist.
I'm interested in seeing how you deal with this one.
If you wipe yourself well enough, then you only really need to worry about sweat, and if you stay indoors mostly and don't get too hot, you wouldn't even have to worry about that all that much. Even so, you might smell, but it's not really going to hurt anything (beyond your social life, anyway).TheHmm said:I say this:
You really have to change your underwear more than once a month.
Perhaps you should explain the etymology to anyone who doesn't like it.The Salty Vulcan said:Addison Clark Vulcan is a terrible name for a boy. Its a girl's name! It has no sense of respectability or authority about it and hes just bound to become a target for bullies.
You, sir, are a wonderful person, and I feel very much honoured to have you on my thread. $500 is the least I could possibly give to someone of your stature, and I won't take no for an answer.OlasDAlmighty said:You do not owe me $500, you cannot, should not, and will not deposit $500 into my paypal account. OlasDAlmighty@gmail.com
[sub][sub]kidding of course[/sub][/sub]
Well done, I am entirely ok with your argumentSaladfork said:That is something that can never be proven.Torrasque said:Oooo I am bookmarking this to read later, it shall provide plenty of luls.
Hmmm... Oh wow, I'm surprised no one has tackled this one yet:
God does not exist.
I'm interested in seeing how you deal with this one.
See, if an omnipotent being wants to not be found, he's obviously never going to be found. Similarly, if such a being can create the universe in its' present form, then logically he would now enough about how it works to manipulate it subtly enough as to not be noticed.
Finally, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
He didn't choose the thread topic, the thread topic chose him?Storm Dragon said:Aww... And here I was ready to jump in with "You started a thread on the Escapist forums in which you argue with people."Saladfork said:Well, okay, one ground rule:
No paradoxes. Seriously, you guys will make my brain explode.
I will admit fully that I only came here to be proven right. I never pass up a good chance to toot my own dick.Saladfork said:Most private settings expect at least some degree of 'decency' from the employees and customers that go there. If, for example, you were to go to a restaurant and proceed to bellow out your conversations at ten times normal volume, you would likely be thrown out for the impoliteness you are showing everyone else there. There are several different expressions of disrespect that won't be tolerated in the interests of keeping a pleasant place.mjcabooseblu said:It is impossible to argue for the censorship of profanity without some sort of logical fallacy (most common of which are the slippery slope fallacy and appeal to emotion.)
Now, profanity is, by its' very nature, rude. I think most would agree that randomly throwing it into your statements will throw people off at the very least. It usually implies either disrespect or familiarity with the person you're talking to, and when talking to people you only know in a professional setting, or people you don't know at all, the only way they'll think to take it is as disrespect, and like most such signs, will not be tolerated.
Monty Python is often treated in the same way the 'cake is a lie' thing is. It's been so ridiculously overused that it reached the point of oversaturation. I'd be willing to bet that, for example, upon learning the title of Dragon Age 3, quite a lot of people thought of a particular ony Python sketch regarding inquisition, but most of the didn't post it because they figured everyone else thought of it as well.Owyn_Merrilin said:On topic: Nerd culture has become diluted in recent years, as evidenced by the fact that the thread got to two pages before somebody made the obvious Monty Python reference. Your move.
1) Murder is the expression of evolutionary selective pressure in modern society. If allowed, we could weed out the stupid and the weak and strengthen our society as a whole.OhJohnNo said:OT: Murder is a horrible crime that should be opposed and punished.
I was going to talk about the weather before I saw you were from Ontario.JEBWrench said:Well, I'll leave a couple wisecracks to the OP for some of the stances, but for now, can you adopt the counter point to:
I'm too sexy for my shirt, too sexy for my shirt, too sexy for my shirt?
Oay, how about this:klaynexas3 said:While your other counter arguements have seemed pretty well done, I must say this counter arguement hardly seems countering, only saying others could have also been as influential as him to do the same job. Hardly a refute, more of a qualify.
*switches cruelty-o-meter to MAXIMUM POWER*Saladfork said:1) Murder is the expression of evolutionary selective pressure in modern society. If allowed, we could weed out the stupid and the weak and strengthen our society as a whole.
2) If everyone had to fear being murdered by random strangers there would probably be a lot fewer assholes in the world.
I'd argue that's a proble with the impleentation ore than the concept. If there aren't enough players per region, then they should have consolidated some of them to create bigger playerbases, or failing that, perhaps try marketing the game better.MeChaNiZ3D said:Fair enough, except that the small playerbase of any region other than Japan, which has about the same prices as EU but is naturally locked by language anyway, practically breaks the multiplayer. Armoured Core V has a persistent online territory system that works well in Japan, but basically gives way to boosting and grinding everywhere else due to a predictable lack of players. Furthermore, you can import the game and play on that region's server, and Australia (part of EU) is not region locked within itself, allowing me to import a copy for even my own region at about half the price.
Chandelure is mediocre at best. It has a very good special attack, but its' low speed and defences cripple it against anyone who knows what they're doing, and if they manage to get a stealth roc out, you might as well consider it dead already. You might be able to use it as a revenge killer with a choice scarf, but one kill before dying is about the best you can hope for.Shanicus said:Hydreigon is the best pokemon ever, second only to Chandelure in pure, unadulterated power and utility.
There are some pieces of art that are universally considered bad. See Birdemic, The Room, anos: The Hands of Fate, A Serbian Film, and so on. If every opinion on a certain work is the same, is it still subjective? If there isn't a single person espousing it as good (as opposed to 'so bad it's good), then is it still subjective at all?T0ad 0f Truth said:All art is subjective, and there's no such thing as an objectively good work of art
...And I don't hate myself for saying this just to see what you'd say!