I wasn't commenting on that. I'm just commenting on the fact that people want to argue over things that really don't need to be argued. That is all.x434343 said:If you look, I commented the story was bad but the visuals good. I then explained the visual process and how the story just wan't good and I got attacked over it. It wasn't entertainment that was the question.DazWolf said:Yeah, it's pretty much come down to the idea that it was made for entertainment. If Cameron actually wanted to make a difference and a statement, he would have spent the money on charity or some such instead of making a film, which indeed looks very nice in 3-D, which was meant to entertain the populace. People are still just looking for things to get their knickers in a twist over.