Strangely enough my searchbar test brought no proper match, so my apologies if a similar thread exists. What ruins a promising movie is a matter of taste, of course, but I've noticed a few obvious mistakes that movie makers keep repeating. These include
Making a horror movie of some unknown, supernatural evil. Then explaining the phenomenon to death.
Making a thriller about serial killings etc. and dropping so many hints the viewer guesses who the culprit is about 5 minutes in. (I'm looking at you, Saw. I think. I was too annoyed to finish that one tbh.)
Time travel. Okay, it doesn't ruin a movie but it does guarantee plot holes that are hard to plug even in the context of the movie. Take Terminator, for instance. Without the whole time travel ordeal John Connor wouldn't even exist!
Then there's the paradox of time travel: if you go back in time to fix something and succeed, you no longer have a motivation for going back in time and thus never did.
Ah, I'm just being too serious with this one.
Dear Escapists, what, if anything, do you think is a bad turn of a plot that makes an initially good movie turn sour?
Making a horror movie of some unknown, supernatural evil. Then explaining the phenomenon to death.
Making a thriller about serial killings etc. and dropping so many hints the viewer guesses who the culprit is about 5 minutes in. (I'm looking at you, Saw. I think. I was too annoyed to finish that one tbh.)
Time travel. Okay, it doesn't ruin a movie but it does guarantee plot holes that are hard to plug even in the context of the movie. Take Terminator, for instance. Without the whole time travel ordeal John Connor wouldn't even exist!
Then there's the paradox of time travel: if you go back in time to fix something and succeed, you no longer have a motivation for going back in time and thus never did.
Ah, I'm just being too serious with this one.
Dear Escapists, what, if anything, do you think is a bad turn of a plot that makes an initially good movie turn sour?