Points you can't argue against?

Recommended Videos

Deofuta

New member
Nov 10, 2009
1,099
0
0
Well its the difference between Objective and Subjective truth isnt it? I can say, Water Freezes at 32 degrees fahrenheit, and there is no valid point agaisnt it.
 

Shambl3s

New member
Dec 16, 2009
60
0
0
poncho14 said:
I was born in Scotland.
You weren't.

It's not a valid argument, but it's an argument nevertheless. The goal of a debate is basically to nullify your oponents statements and arguments, which is pretty damn hard.

If it wouldn't be hard though, we'd all be chatting about the weather because everything else had been solved already.
 

E-mantheseeker

New member
Nov 29, 2008
1,102
0
0
HUBILUB said:
E-mantheseeker said:
HUBILUB said:
Dorian6 said:
1. The earth is round, billions of years old, spins on an axis, and revolves around a star.

2. the internet is for porn
I argue against both of your points.

I win.
You're certainly having a lot of fun with this thread.
Do you want me to stop? because if so, I'll stop.
Oh, you didn't do what I thought you would've, which is respond this way, "Actually I'm not having fun...I win!" I have misjudged you it seems...
 

Cherry Cola

Your daddy, your Rock'n'Rolla
Jun 26, 2009
11,940
0
0
E-mantheseeker said:
HUBILUB said:
E-mantheseeker said:
HUBILUB said:
Dorian6 said:
1. The earth is round, billions of years old, spins on an axis, and revolves around a star.

2. the internet is for porn
I argue against both of your points.

I win.
You're certainly having a lot of fun with this thread.
Do you want me to stop? because if so, I'll stop.
Oh, you didn't do what I thought you would've, which is respond this way, "Actually I'm not having fun...I win!" I have misjudged you it seems...
I figured that my actions could be interpreted as trolling, and so I thought that perhaps I should stop
[sub]Dammit, that would have been hilarious! Why didn't I do that?[/sub]
 

E-mantheseeker

New member
Nov 29, 2008
1,102
0
0
poncho14 said:
E-mantheseeker said:
poncho14 said:
E-mantheseeker said:
poncho14 said:
I was born in Scotland.
Actually your mother herself could argue against that point, saying you were born in Italy and your birth certificate is a false one for example.

Ok then how about I have hair, you can't argue with that even if you say you can't see me I will send pictures of my uh hair:p
You may actually have a point there... *looks at poncho14's avatar* Squirtle is bald therefore your point is invalid
You can't see my bottom half hair ^^
Haha, Squirtles don't have lower hair. Oh... behind the shell. *curls into fetal position*
 

Shambl3s

New member
Dec 16, 2009
60
0
0
VicunaBlue said:
2=2

Argue with that.
Ah, but two isn't always two. Two (bananas) aren't the same as two (peaches). It's still two is two, but in that case it is untrue. And even if my argument IS invalid, it's still an argument. Your argument doesn't have to be right, you just have to convince the other person that it is right.
 

randomsix

New member
Apr 20, 2009
773
0
0
Captain Pancake said:
I exist. I think, therefore I am.
Really? Prove to me you aren't just a subroutine running in some supercomputer and the world ISN'T like the Matrix. You can't.

ma55ter_fett said:
LifsAndlat said:
ma55ter_fett said:
I have ten fingers.

This point can't be argued upon.
Some people consider the thumbs to not technically be fingers.
Some people consider the world to be flat, but they are still fucking wrong.
That all depends on how many dimensions you are able to perceive. A being that perceives more dimensions may indeed interpret the world as flat, if only because their other perceptions make it so. A being that perceives less can only interpret the world as flat.

OT: Memories are not evidence of reality. At most, they can be corroborated with, but never proved. Therefor, you have no proof that you were just created with all of the memories in your head fabricated beforehand.
 

Oats

New member
Oct 31, 2009
5
0
0
I don't think there is a point you can't argue against.

For all the people that say science is based on facts and so can't be argued against, load of rubbish. An electron microscope can't feasibly magnify something that much for the naked eye without using a display of some kind. Who's to say that that is actually what it looks like?

Also theres my favorite colours argument. Red is Red (supposedly) but who's to say that my Red is the same as yours. Science tells us that (again supposedly) all Red has the same wavelength (or frequency, can't remember which) but who says my eyes don't convert it to what you think is green? I've always been told that what I see is Red.

So no I don't think there is a point you can't argue
 

Hussmann54

New member
Dec 14, 2009
1,288
0
0
HUBILUB said:
Kollega said:
Nazi and Stalin's regimes were bad, what with killing millions of people and all. If you try to argue against it, you have no respect for human life.
In some aspects they where good.

See, I totally argued against you.
Yea see, when you look at hitler, he was actually one of the most efficient leaders mankind has ever seen. He brought Germany out of an economic pit without breaking a sweat. But that doesnt necessarily mean that everything he did was good. But I still think he was wrong for killing those people.