Points you can't argue against?

Recommended Videos

jowy

New member
Aug 4, 2009
4
0
0
There is nothing one can´t argue against:

Even extreme statements like "Hitler was a bad man" can be argued against with arguments like "He did it for his people, hence at least he was a good man to them"

But then again: "There is nothing one can´t argue against"
 

BaldursBananaSoap

New member
May 20, 2009
1,573
0
0
Well, you can knock me down,
Step in my face,
Slander my name
All over the place.

Do anything that you want to do, but uh-uh,
Honey, lay off of my shoes
Don't you step on my Blue suede shoes.
Well you can do anything but lay off of my blue suede shoes.

You can burn my house,
Steal my car,
Drink my liquor
From an old fruitjar.

Do anything that you want to do, but uh-uh,
Honey, lay off of my shoes
Don't you step on my blue suede shoes.
Well you can do anything but lay off of my blue suede shoes

You can't argue against that.
 

Hussmann54

New member
Dec 14, 2009
1,288
0
0
Oats said:
I don't think there is a point you can't argue against.

For all the people that say science is based on facts and so can't be argued against, load of rubbish. An electron microscope can't feasibly magnify something that much for the naked eye without using a display of some kind. Who's to say that that is actually what it looks like?

Also theres my favorite colours argument. Red is Red (supposedly) but who's to say that my Red is the same as yours. Science tells us that (again supposedly) all Red has the same wavelength (or frequency, can't remember which) but who says my eyes don't convert it to what you think is green? I've always been told that what I see is Red.

So no I don't think there is a point you can't argue
The problem with the color spectrum topic is that with millions and billions of people on this planet, eventually you will run into conflict because at some point two people would meet from different upbringings and would actually be capable of thinking two distinguishable colors are the same. Conflict ensues.....
 

cheese_wizington

New member
Aug 16, 2009
2,328
0
0
HUBILUB said:
Worgen said:
Machines Are Us said:
The existence of God can neither be proven nor dis-proven.

Science can't prove that all the laws they come up with are not created by a divine being.
If a 'God' was revealed to humanity it could not be proven that it truly is a God, as any effects could be a hallucination or whatnot.
the existence of a unicorn cannot be proven nor dis-proven
Oh yeah? Then what about this footage!?



Proof!
Yay!
 

zerzxes

New member
Apr 14, 2009
399
0
0
LordCuthberton said:
I'm awesome.

See, you just can't argue.
You're and ego thinking that you are better than everyone else and therefore a douche!

And for my point Pizza is awesome!
[small]I don't care if it can be argued, it's still awesome![/small]
 

Hussmann54

New member
Dec 14, 2009
1,288
0
0
T-Bone24 said:
Captain Pancake said:
I exist. I think, therefore I am.
Or is it just you think you exist?
Well if he doesnt exist then how the heck can he even think to begin with.
I say let the Laws of thermodynamics settle this.
We are thinking and typing on keyboards, seeing responses, hearing clicks of keys on said keyboard. If we truly dont exist then non of this could happen. And if matter cant be created, nor be destroyed, then there would truly be nothing instead of some fantasy. But if we are seeing and thinking and feeling, then something must exist.
 

ejb626

New member
Aug 6, 2009
1,322
0
0
In order to sustain life you have to continue to breathe, you won't get much farther if you stop.
 

tino1498

New member
Apr 11, 2008
111
0
0
this is all epistemology. How do we know what we know? There is always the argument that what we see is what is different then what is really there, so everything we see is false. So yes, I would say that everything is arguable.
 

Geekmaster K

New member
Sep 29, 2009
189
0
0
Deofuta said:
Well its the difference between Objective and Subjective truth isnt it? I can say, Water Freezes at 32 degrees fahrenheit, and there is no valid point agaisnt it.
Water freezes at 32 degrees farenheit (or 0 degrees Celsius) most of the time. Elevation, however, affects the freezing and boiling points of water. I live in high elevation, and I've learned that while water boils at 100 degrees Celsius at normal elevation, it boils at around 90 to 95 degrees Celsius at 7,000 feet above sea level. It affects the freezing point in a similar way. If you don't believe me, consult a chemistry textbook or my college chemistry teacher. Looks like I just made a valid point against your argument.

Also, I'm a guy who was born in the United States (if you don't believe I'm a male, or that I'm American, I can prove both of these things) and I have a hairy chest that I inherited from my dad's gene pool. I can prove the last one as well, but if you're disturbed by hairy men, I don't think you want to see it. Since I can prove all of the things I mentioned about myself, I'd like to see you try arguing against any of it.
 

Hussmann54

New member
Dec 14, 2009
1,288
0
0
Two guys are in a room, at a table. One is a zero Point Nihilist. He is in a debate over absolute existence.
"There is no way of knowing that anything exists or not. Not this table, not that lamp, not the chairs, not you or me!"
"Really?" his friend responds. He then punches himself in the face. Writhing in pain he says "But that was real, I felt it."
The Nihilist say "But its relevant only to you, it may only exist in your mind, but I cant feel it and therefore argue the possibility that it may not exist at all."
The first guy says "What did you say about the chair?" as he picked it up and dragged it to his friend who says "It may not exist"
"Oh, ok then..." Without warning he picks up the chair and breaks it on the nihilists face. The nihilist drops to the ground in pain, his face now bleeding openly, he shouts "What did you do that for?"
His friend laughs "The chair doesnt exist, you said it yourself. So that blood doesnt exist and neither does your pain. Man up and get a pair!"
 

Fireproof217

New member
Jul 6, 2009
26
0
0
Glefistus said:
The fact that we are the product of ~3.5-4 billion years of evolution.
Prove to me that you (and the world) didn't come into existence five seconds ago with all these pre-programmed memories and "past experiences".
 

Teddy Roosevelt

New member
Nov 11, 2009
650
0
0
TheNamlessGuy said:
Opinions.
Nothing can't be argued.
Nothing
Yes, that includes deceases.
"Oh, well you have cancer"
"No, I'm healthy, cancer is what the body is supposed to look like. It's you who is sick!"

Stupid, yes, but it's an argument
That is simply wrong. There are opinions, but then there is fact. You cannot argue, and simultaneously be correct, that cancer is the intended form of the human body. Genetically, cancer cells are mutated negatively, and without telomeres to restrict cell growth they destroy the structure of a larger animal, and thus they are NOT what the body is supposed to look like. In order to have a valid point, there has to be some truth or correctness to it, or at least a part of it, otherwise you are blabbering nonesense.