Points you can't argue against?
- Thread starter E-mantheseeker
- Start date
Recommended Videos
HAHA this post goes with mine: I can't argue against my fiance. He thinks he knows everything (and yeah usually he does) until these two days when i (the worlds dummest kitten) actually got to prove him wrong:Chapper said:
Me: who was the guy who played Gandalf in Lord of the Rings? I'm sure it was Ian McKellan.
Him: Nah it definatly wasn't him, but i can't remember who it was.
Me: I'm sure it was. Hey *friend's name* what was the guys name who played Gandalf?
Friend: Ian McKellan
Him: F**k you!
Ok so baring in mind he was unwell at the time and truthfully i do not think he was really paying much attention, so maybe that doesn't count. However due to my hard work i managed to get an A on my assignment whereas he only got a B. Sorry but i found it amusing that he is usually smarter then me but i managed to beat him even though i had done barely anything on the work and didn't even think i would scrape a C yet alone my 2nd ever A...
Another one not to argue with is my mother unless you want a cup smashed off your head or chucked out into the cold.
I got one!
The point that This Thread made Arguments!
ITS FUNNY CAUSE ITS TRUE!!!
...I win..
P.s im really suprised nobody did that one yet..
For Shame..
The point that This Thread made Arguments!
ITS FUNNY CAUSE ITS TRUE!!!
...I win..
P.s im really suprised nobody did that one yet..
For Shame..
There are two sides to every argument.
You can't beat that because if you contradict it you only prove my point =)
You can't beat that because if you contradict it you only prove my point =)
I assume you understand about the Hubble Telescope?aakibar said:
Because the speed of light isn't that efficient over the vastness of space, the further we look into space the further we actually look into the past as the light starts to arrive from that time. We can clearly see from some of these images brought from this telescope that roughly 14 billion lightyears away (so 14 million years ago) there are galaxy structures unlike that of any seen in closer areas, looking remarkebly like scattered energy and dust, in a roughly circular formation resembling a mass expansion of compacted such.
Wormholes are visible because of their light-curving nature, which brings up circular pattern in star formations, splaying out stars in a web around that area of space. From this we can deduct that there is some form of all-absorbing "hole."
The other things are merely hypothesese, or unproven ideas, that we can't really detect at the moment but collaborate with other theories. God itself is a hypothesis, although the evidence is almost non-existant.
Not true, there are many, many more than 2 sides, in fact, by saying there are a mere 2 side you present a paradox in which every argument is either right or wrong, there would be no middle ground.ultrachicken said:
The fact is that there is always a middle ground, and this is why we can argue anything, because the "middle" is subjective and it is up to each person to find their own stance. So in reality there are over 6 billion sides to each argument.
when your wife/girlfriend ask's you "why did you leave the fridge open"... every man will react the same way "...uhhh..."
