aakibar said:
Glefistus said:
MattRooney06 said:
The whole point of science is to build a knowledge base based off of evidence.
Theoritical physics is a science correct, there is NO evidence that there was a big bang, or a wormhole, or strings, neither can the properties of quarks and other such sub atomic be determined.
Granted they are all theories but you have to have evidence to start a theory, i think
I assume you understand about the Hubble Telescope?
Because the speed of light isn't that efficient over the vastness of space, the further we look into space the further we actually look into the past as the light starts to arrive from that time. We can clearly see from some of these images brought from this telescope that roughly 14 billion lightyears away (so 14 million years ago) there are galaxy structures unlike that of any seen in closer areas, looking remarkebly like scattered energy and dust, in a roughly circular formation resembling a mass expansion of compacted such.
Wormholes are visible because of their light-curving nature, which brings up circular pattern in star formations, splaying out stars in a web around that area of space. From this we can deduct that there is some form of all-absorbing "hole."
The other things are merely hypothesese, or unproven ideas, that we can't really detect at the moment but collaborate with other theories. God itself is a hypothesis, although the evidence is almost non-existant.
