However, why put the burden of a child on someone else when it's just easier to terminate the pregnancy? Besides, there could be an instance where the mother is a carrier for a disease or condition that will most likely be passed on to the child. I think abortion should remain legal just for the sake of population control.The Potato Lord post=18.68731.638473 said:It's not a big political issue at the moment but i'm against abortion. The adoption process yields the same result of not having to raise a child while not killing the baby. Abortion is completely unnessecary in my opinion.
I considered including this in my post, but then I just didn't.Ivoryagent post=18.68731.638598 said:Absolutely yes, you are.HSIAMetalKing post=18.68731.638577 said:To me, asking if abortion is a political issue is like asking if the legalization of murder is a political issue.
I don't support abortion-- people should be responsible and exercise some goddamn self control.
Of course, I guess I'm just a silly idealist.
But I'll ask this question again. What if the girl was raped?
right and how many people do you know who gave their children up for adoption? i will say you know none. it sounds so simple and nice HOWEVER there's a lot of unintended consequences with that. those including worrying over the child's well being, depression and suicide, the fact the child will wonder about their real parents as well and a few other things.HSIAMetalKing post=18.68731.638615 said:In the case of rape, execute the rapist and let the baby be born. If the mother does not want to raise it, then have it sent to an orphanage. This serves several purposes-- the world has one less rapist, the heavy penalty acts as a deterrent, and the child isn't killed.
You don't know that they're going to have a horrible life-- at least they're getting a chance. I know that I was once a fetus, and if my parents had had me scrambled up before I was born, it would have totally sucked.Ivoryagent post=18.68731.638645 said:?HSIAMetalKing post=18.68731.638615 said:I considered including this in my post, but then I just didn't.Ivoryagent post=18.68731.638598 said:Absolutely yes, you are.HSIAMetalKing post=18.68731.638577 said:To me, asking if abortion is a political issue is like asking if the legalization of murder is a political issue.
I don't support abortion-- people should be responsible and exercise some goddamn self control.
Of course, I guess I'm just a silly idealist.
But I'll ask this question again. What if the girl was raped?
In the case of rape, execute the rapist and let the baby be born. If the mother does not want to raise it, then have it sent to an orphanage. This serves several purposes-- the world has one less rapist, the heavy penalty acts as a deterrent, and the child isn't killed.
Silly, killing the rapist doesn't solve anything. The child would still have to be subject to a horrible life as the spawn of a rapist and an unwilling female victim.
Anyways, like I said, killing a fetus without a conscience is just as immoral as killing a fucking plant, and I personally don't give a tit about plants.
I may not personally know any people who gave their children up for adoption, but I do have a friend who has three adopted sisters. All of them are now living very happy lives.cleverlymadeup post=18.68731.638651 said:right and how many people do you know who gave their children up for adoption? i will say you know none. it sounds so simple and nice HOWEVER there's a lot of unintended consequences with that. those including worrying over the child's well being, depression and suicide, the fact the child will wonder about their real parents as well and a few other things.
as nice and as easy as it sounds to give up the child for adoption, it's not and far from it. i'd suggest you try doing it yourself or go ask someone who has done it in the past and see how easy it was to give up the child and then what they suffered after