Poll: Adidas Slave Shoes

Recommended Videos

Adam Galli

New member
Nov 26, 2010
700
0
0
http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20120619/PC16/120619040/after-slavery-controversy-adidas-pulls-shackles-shoe

I didn't see anything posted about this but adidas made a pair of shoes which came with a pair of shackles many people found the idea offensive and related the shoes to the shackles of slavery. Personally, I don't think they're offensive but I do think they're stupid.

Any thoughts? Do you find them offensive?

 

GistoftheFist

New member
Jan 6, 2012
281
0
0
Why the hell would you want those plastic shackles on them anyway? They'd get caught in your pantlegs and rattle all the time making you noisy. Remove those pointless things and they're fine.
 

Wadders

New member
Aug 16, 2008
3,796
0
0
They are fucking grotesque.

Never mind the connotations of slavery, you should be locked up for thinking that they are in any way nice or wearable.

Adidas make some nice stuff, but then they go and make something like that. I mean, why?

fashion police, over and out.

captcha: 'marry me' okaaay...
 

Smeatza

New member
Dec 12, 2011
934
0
0
I can't believe it's actually reached this point.
Where hip hop culture (and therefore it's clothes) has become so clueless, so vacuous, that it's forgotten about the slave trade?

I hope I'm wrong, I hope that their design and marketing was nothing to do with hip hop or it's culture (Adidas are certainly claiming so).
I'm not confident though.
 

Adam Galli

New member
Nov 26, 2010
700
0
0
Smeatza said:
I can't believe it's actually reached this point.
Where hip hop culture (and therefore it's clothes) has become so clueless, so vacuous, that it's forgotten about the slave trade?

I hope I'm wrong, I hope that their design and marketing was nothing to do with hip hop or it's culture (Adidas are certainly claiming so).
I'm not confident though.
apparently the desing was based on my pet monster from the 80s
 

ResonanceSD

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 14, 2009
4,538
5
43
Blablahb said:
Smeatza said:
I can't believe it's actually reached this point.
Where hip hop culture (and therefore it's clothes) has become so clueless, so vacuous, that it's forgotten about the slave trade?
Maybe you can tell us what the point is of endlessly dragging on and on about a very small event that occurred centuries ago and which nobody alive today has witnessed?

And yes, very fucking small, because there's much bigger historical events with a much larger impact today, like the First World War.
I'm with Daedalus here. Because trivialising this sort of thing brings it closer to being acceptable. I'm not sure how you can't understand this.
 

Esotera

New member
May 5, 2011
3,400
0
0
I want to see someone wearing a pair of these at the top of some stairs so I can switch the shackles to cross each legs, and then the person wearing them dies in the fall and humanity is pure once again.

I think it's pretty brave of Addidas to make something like this considering they've probably been made in a sweatshop. The shoes aren't that offensive to me in connotations, they're just offensive in their god-awful style.
 

Goofguy

New member
Nov 25, 2010
3,864
0
0
Those just looks stupid. So it supposed to be some kind of statement? Like how we're shackled to the latest and greatest in merchandising? How we're slaves to capitalism?

Regardless of the message (fashion or society), they look really terrible.
 

yeti585

New member
Apr 1, 2012
380
0
0
I don't see what is so offensive about it. Maybe Adidas was going to make the shoe's commercial say something like "A slave to the game". Other then the mention of slavery that wouldn't even be offensive, but then again slavery is offensive because anyone can be enslaved.
 

Pinkamena

Stuck in a vortex of sexy horses
Jun 27, 2011
2,371
0
0
Not at all, but you'd look like a fucking tool if you wore them!
 

Smeatza

New member
Dec 12, 2011
934
0
0
Adam Galli said:
apparently the desing was based on my pet monster from the 80s
Ah, the pictures I looked up didn't have the shackles.
Seeing this picture I can relax, it's not as bad as I thought.
Still a little ignorant though.

Blablahb said:
Maybe you can tell us what the point is of endlessly dragging on and on about a very small event that occurred centuries ago and which nobody alive today has witnessed?

And yes, very fucking small, because there's much bigger historical events with a much larger impact today, like the First World War.
I do not currently have the patience to explain the issues with modern hip hop culture, and how it has become out of touch and even downright destructive towards equal rights movements for African Americans.

Also, whether you like to admit it or not, the slave trade and the civil rights struggles that followed are the single most important events in the history of the USA, perhaps even the world.
I would argue that they were much more significant than WW1 especially to the USA.
You certainly can not consider it "a very small event."
 

Adam Galli

New member
Nov 26, 2010
700
0
0
Smeatza said:
I do not currently have the patience to explain the issues with modern hip hop culture, and how it has become out of touch and even downright destructive towards equal rights movements for African Americans.

Also, whether you like to admit it or not, the slave trade and the civil rights struggles that followed are the single most important events in the history of the USA, perhaps even the world.
I would argue that they were much more significant than WW1 especially to the USA.
You certainly can not consider it "a very small event."
I can't agree with you more on this one. Living near Detroit I get to see a lot of faux gansters that are more concerned with buying $300 shoes than the city they live in.
 

Dags90

New member
Oct 27, 2009
4,683
0
0
yeti585 said:
I don't see what is so offensive about it. Maybe Adidas was going to make the shoe's commercial say something like "A slave to the game". Other then the mention of slavery that wouldn't even be offensive, but then again slavery is offensive because anyone can be enslaved.
Some might draw parallels with slavery and the ubiquitous poor working conditions of retail clothing makers.[footnote]http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/nov/19/jasonburke.theobserver[/footnote]

They're also just offensively ugly.