That's where the design came from in the first place.Johann610 said:Is it odd that I equate those cuffs to "My Pet Monster?" Real shackles would be silver-ish, or black. These are cartoony. http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/news/Pet-Monster-The-Complete-Series/10615
This here... same point of view as me. I didn't quite grab the "slavery" tone of these shoes, but I definitely thought of child labour and Chinese/Taiwanese sweat shops.lacktheknack said:I find it offensive for unrelated reasons.
https://www.oxfam.org.au/explore/workers-rights/adidas
As dry and downplayed as that link is, Adidas HAS been caught in child labor scandals in the past, and it made me pretty ticked to see these shoes with that in mind.
Completely disagree, trivializing it makes it more acceptable in terms of not being such a social taboo to talk about. If everyone keeps being scared to even talk about it least they be considered racist, then it'll continue to have such a massive impact and we will never achieve equality.ResonanceSD said:I'm with Daedalus here. Because trivialising this sort of thing brings it closer to being acceptable. I'm not sure how you can't understand this.Blablahb said:Maybe you can tell us what the point is of endlessly dragging on and on about a very small event that occurred centuries ago and which nobody alive today has witnessed?Smeatza said:I can't believe it's actually reached this point.
Where hip hop culture (and therefore it's clothes) has become so clueless, so vacuous, that it's forgotten about the slave trade?
And yes, very fucking small, because there's much bigger historical events with a much larger impact today, like the First World War.