ninjaRiv said:
But there's no reason to just be lazy and not explain it. It only takes a few seconds to give a brief explanation.
That argument works EXACTLY the same in reverse, though, doesn't it - there is no reason to just be lazy and not google it. It only takes a few seconds to do so. It is literally the same. I'd even class it as
worse as in one case - one is asked about something and doesn't bother answering, but in the other, the asker doesn't even bother trying to answer it for himself beforehand. I do think that the one who wants others to do one's job for them is more lazy.
ninjaRiv said:
Surely asking questions promotes conversation and discussion and allows you to talk about something you're interested in?
Aren't you making a lot of assumptions here? Surely if you're asking something that should be discussed, then you...should discuss it. I mean, it is rather obvious and you are trying to pass the obvious for the obvious. Which is redundant. Yes, asking "Why do you like pie?" (for example) can promote discussion. Similarly, if people are interested in pie, they would (most probably) be happy to discuss it.
However, if the question is something that can be googled easily, there, by definition, is no point discussing it if it's not a matter of discussion. With the example slightly above your comment - asking "I have these lyrics, where are they from" is not something a debate, or a lengthy conversation would determine, it's is a single answer that is needed and any else is not needed. Also, I think it's a fair assumption to make that if somebody can't be bothered to explain something you can easily find on your own, then that is probably not one of their passions they are eager to talk about in length. Especially if, as you suggest, there is not much to explain.