Yeah, a valid scientific way to present a question like this is difficult to do. That doesn't make the answers any less interesting though; I wonder why 3 is such a popular option.Xanadu84 said:Ah, but that same expectancy bias means that the subsequent pool would be filled with people who are once again subject to the expectancy bias, and if you went to another website, then the differences in demographics and presentation would leave you with no internal validity.Condor219 said:Factoring that in, the results are interesting. Would the poll have been the exact inverse had this been done without clear intentions? Clearly something to be tested.[small][sub]For Science![/sub][/small]Xanadu84 said:For what its worth, the fact that you tell people what you are doing will skew the results. If people just picked one, the first and last might be highest, but if you tell people what your doing, people might try to pick the one they think is least likely to be picked. It's called expectancy bias.
(My degree is in Psychology, I can be led into a rant like this.)