In the "The Science of Discworld" Trilogy there are some pretty awesome examples of nonhuman civilizations 
No no no! It goes like this:Leadfinger said:Not dead which eternal lies, strange eons death may die.
That would mean they couldn't have reached victorian levels of tech advancement. If we are looking at neolithic levels of technology, then I suppose its "possible" but even at neolithic levels you have the use of stone(it's kinda in the name), which is why we have stone tools over 2M years old. So, maybe some sort of primitive hunter gatherer species in a jungle environment so plant material was used instead, but then where is the evidence of their development? How did they disappear completely and show no trace of their evolution? Forget their tools, where are they?x EvilErmine x said:Well lots of people have said that we would have found evidence if they were here and that's fair enough, however it sort of relies on them being technologically advanced to the point where they can create things that would endure like plastics and such things. What if they were the type of society that eschewed that sort of technology for a more organic type i.e bio degradable things or things that would not survive in a recognizable form.
Also to define 'intelligence' for the purpose of this thread is something that would be comparable to the level of humans plus or minus one standard deviation. Yeah i know that's a bit on the vague side bit i cba to get into a debate as to what exactly 'intelligence' is
Ooh, nifty!manaman said:The formations they are talking about are actually all over the coast of the pacific rim. It's a neat part of the geology of the area, and there are actually sunken walls and other structures which have been modified by humans over the years in places like China and Taiwan. These particular structures actually start on the cost and, according to one very outspoken scientist, show signs of human habitation. Not just built on the site either. He thinks there was a thriving population there that carved statues, built roads and walkways, religious sites, and more.beniki said:manaman said:There is one guy (and a few supporters) that claim it's not a natural formation, a few people interested in exploring the area more, and then everyone else thinks it's a natural formation - including the Japanese goverment that has no interest in the site.x434343 said:Be mindful of spelling, some of us are very... stickler-ish of that.x EvilErmine x said:Ok so this is my first thread so go easy on me)
As for ancient intelligents, yeah. Underwater pyramids off the coast of Japan.
Even if it is the ruins of a city, it's at the most 5,000 years old. Ancient, but not exactly pre humans. As well as the fact that even the top supporter of it being inhabited doesn't think it was built by humans. He thinks it was a mostly natural formation that was shaped by humans. They have found some 1,600 year old evidence of habitation on the continuation of the formation on the shore.
Is this based off satellite pictures or someone going down in a sub? I know there was a guy who claimed there were structures on Mars from looking at 2-d probe images, but was later discredited when someone produce 3-d ones showing them to just be random natural formations.
O.T: I remember an episode of Voyager where the premise was some dinosaurs developed to the point of star ships, and left Earth to begin a nomadic life amongst the stars.
Sure, all things are possible and nothing is ever true forever.
Like I said before, back on land there are signs of habitation dating back 1,600 years, but even then no where near to the level that the professor claims of the sunken city.
His pictures are misleading as well often taken at the perfect angle to look artificial. What I find the oddest of all is that he claims to have found caricatures and paintings, but has yet to produce any pictures, the only pictures he has on his site even are the same ones he has been showing around since the 90s.
The greys or the little bio-mechanical drones?LegendaryGamer0 said:Yes. Humans have no idea of those whom have been calling this planet home.
It is better you do not know. For your own good.
Was that directed at me?Tarmon said:It's possible but I find it highly unlikely because there is no indication that something like that has happened.
By the way English is not my first language and I really hope it isn't yours either because I might make a mistake now and then but you are not very proficient at this at all.
Well since i'm a bit dyslexic spelling is not my strong point and there's nothing i can do about it. Tell me though, does being a sarcastic dick to people over the internet make you feel good?David Bray said:As long as humans spell like this:
Ancent intelegent life, is it possable?
We can be certain that there is more intelligent life out there, quite likely before us
I was quoting Metallica rather than LovecraftVrik said:No no no! It goes like this:Leadfinger said:Not dead which eternal lies, strange eons death may die.
That is not dead, which can eternal lie
And with strange aeons, even death may die
Meta-who? O.OLeadfinger said:I was quoting Metallica rather than LovecraftVrik said:No no no! It goes like this:Leadfinger said:Not dead which eternal lies, strange eons death may die.
That is not dead, which can eternal lie
And with strange aeons, even death may die![]()