I don't see why it would be shameful - people who don't have the time to both read and workout, or who have a long driving commute (or a long train/bus commute who get carsick) can multitask with audiobooks. Plus there are more audio versions of books than there are large print or braille versions, so it's good for people with visual impairments as well. And where's the shame in being busy, carsick or blind?
I do think it's a different experience than reading something on your own, because there's a level of performance to the reader's work (the emphasis they select, the way they read certain voices), so there's less creative work on the part of the reader in selecting their own emphasis/accent, but that hardly makes listening to them shame-worthy. It just makes it different.
I do think it's a different experience than reading something on your own, because there's a level of performance to the reader's work (the emphasis they select, the way they read certain voices), so there's less creative work on the part of the reader in selecting their own emphasis/accent, but that hardly makes listening to them shame-worthy. It just makes it different.
Out of curiosity, why?Queen Michael said:Gotta admit it: I personally find audiobooks to be shameul.