DanielBrown said:
They're purely entertainment from my point of view. I don't get why people gotta label it as art just to defend that they still play games.
... and let the flame wars begin.
Its not about labeling it art just so you can say you play it with out any shame. I could play um... hm...
Well, oka, I could play
Drake of the 99 Dragons and call it art, but it would still get me some hateful looks. its about giving games the rights other things art wise get, which is good, because then they dont get hounded on and hated as much, or have something of a shield so Fox news and that dumb ass conservatives
That Agree dont blast to to pieces and make game companies decide not to.
But I say its both. Like moves are both. and really art its self in the sense that we thinkg of it (picutres, paintings, sculptures, side walk drawings [o.0? yes, I did just said side walk drawings, you'll see in a second]) can be entertaining.
For example, these are all things I find rather entertaining that could be considered art:
http://www.neatorama.com/images/2006-09/julian-beever-chalk-illusion.jpghttp://premierartscene.com/uploads/pics/1000year_01.jpghttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/_xAAWfC-DeXg/TF2ZNQJ-zDI/AAAAAAAAAV8/AiYiblZaWFM/s1600/SilenceOfTheLambs.jpghttp://www.videogamelists.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/shadow_of_the_colossus_ps2.jpg