Poll: Are Humans Smart?

Recommended Videos

systemsamurai

New member
Jul 3, 2008
2
0
0
If you have to ask such a question, then you are obviously having second thoughts as to your usefulness to the species.

Yes we are "intelligent" but seeing as this frame of reference only applies to mammals that can write in a verity of understood languages, we can't really see how intelligent squid, dolphins, cats or dogs are as we don't have any method of communication. You could always take the piss and start using Douglas Adams-esque references to dolphins being supremely intelligent, and the only ones that are left on earth are there to warn us of an impending doom, despite us treating them like amusements.

But, if you think about it, you might be "intelligent" but how much of today's achievements do you really understand? If you were given a heap of components, could you build something so "outdated" as a CRT TV? Or write a play to capture the hearts of an audience? As a culture we are only as brilliant as our brightest, and the rest of us are just excess. But again, its not like we are going to go killing each other because of our lack of usefulness. That's what we do to animals, seeing as they are the "lower" forms of life.

Mullahgrrl: Definately.

And please don't use the internet as a frame of reference to a great creation, even some of its creators have said they would have rather not created it seeing what it has been used for. Use fission, fusion, the wheel, gears, the transistor, Shakespeare, Tolstoy, the cotton gin, musical instruments, just not the internet.
 

Alotak

New member
May 14, 2008
613
0
0
We are extremely nieve to call our selves intelligent.
There are probibly, more intelligent life forms out there...
 

SilentHunter7

New member
Nov 21, 2007
1,652
0
0
Have you ever looked up at a night sky and just wondered? Maybe thought about the vastness of the universe, or mankind's relative smallness? I cant imagine anything without a relatively advanced thought process even fathoming some of the things we do. Sure some primates are known to use tools, and some insects can construct entire 'cities'. But how many do you think look at each other and ask what's their purpose? How many creatures do you think wonder about life, and wonder whether we're accidents or if there's a higher power? How many do you think have arguments over how intelligent their species really is?

Think about it. It's one thing to know that you can use a rock to break open a coconut, it's quite another to ask why the coconut breaks when you hit it.
 

EXPLOSION

New member
Jul 13, 2008
6
0
0
define intelligence

Evilbunny said:
Khedive Rex said:
Before I voice my opinion on this matter I would like to say that it's a proven fact Neanderthals had larger brains than modern day humans. Are we smarter than Parakeetes? Of course. Are we the smartest creatures that have ever lived and the most awesome and the only one worth disscussing? No.
I don't think the size of one's brain dictates how intelligent one is. Look at a cow's brain, it's huge, but a cow is one of the stupidest creatures I've ever seen. Also, may I remind you while Neanderthals were bigger, our ancestors the cro magnon were smart enough to make arrows and woven clothing. Something that escaped Neanderthals.
also, tell me how a cow stupid; standing around in a safe, enclosed paddock, eating, sleeping, socialising and occasionally getting laid. tell me that isn't bliss.

you're a good example of the stupidity of humans, you assume you're really smart, but you can't spell parakeets, AND you don't know how to use the spell check.

another thing: i heard a lot of mention of IQ, firstly this is only a test to identify mental retardation in children, secondly it can only be applied to humans to compare between humans, and thirdly it is not a true test of intelligence, it is just a glorified general knowledge test.
 

blank0000

New member
Oct 3, 2007
382
0
0
I actually belevie humans are very intelligent when related to the species of the planet. The fact that so many of us are willing to point out our own flaws as a species only proves this more. Yes we fight, yes their are silly wars. But considering modern inventions such as say, THE INTERNET, and the massive citys so many of us live in, not to mention a colaberative understanding of material to the subatomic level, I'd say we're doing pretty well "considering other species" MAybe we just got lucky and prospered at the right time, who knows. It's all relative to what we consider to be intelligent.
 

Sylocat

Sci-Fi & Shakespeare
Nov 13, 2007
2,122
0
0
Just a few things to think about...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=3Vz_YTNLn6w
http://youtube.com/watch?v=k_oUDev1rME
http://youtube.com/watch?v=8ZohpDS2aMc
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZyQjr1YL0zg
http://snopes.com/critters/edibles/dogsoup.asp
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JobynUg0ftg
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Your project for today

Download the Internet [http://tinyurl.com/5q3cu6]

Think about this though:

Perhaps we ARE the most intelligent creatures in the Universe.

Now look on George Dubya with TRUE horror.
 

Korolev

No Time Like the Present
Jul 4, 2008
1,853
0
0
Khedive Rex said:
Korolev said:
As a species we are generally intelligent, and a hell of a lot more intelligent than any other species on the planet. We are the only species with a complex language that has grammar and syntax. We are the only species which has extend its natural lifespan. We are the only species which have comprehended the most fundamental aspects of the universe. We are the only species with philosophy, advanced morality and science. We are the only species which has ANY prospect of self-improvement.
Actually, dolphins and whales communicate with a more complicated language than we do according to a lot of studies.

Countless species have extended their natural life span by adapting to better live around humans. Whether this involves pretending to be dogs (in the case of wolves) so people will give you food, patroling with three people intead of two (in the case of racoons) to ease the act of stealing food, or just making yourself look cuter and more cuddly while around humans (in the case of pigs who before domestication had tusks and wiry hair and now look mostly harmless) so that humans will get rid of all your parasites and generally make your life more pleasent, species are extending their life spans all the time.

As for not grasping the basics how the earth works, Racoons perfer to wash the food they find before they eat it. There would be no reason to do this except to remove germs. Ants build boats which are capable of crossing things like the Mississippi River, I think they would understand properties like boyancy and displacement. There are also the countless species (Crows, Monkeys, ect) who know to use things like gravity in problem solving.

As for animal morality I would point out that just because we don't recognize it doesn't mean it's not there. We can't get people to agree on what is morally correct even amoungst our own species (and there is often violent disagreement on this particular issue), how would we be able to discern what other species view as morally sound or how would we even know that their species had come to any kind of concensus? that being said though, Elephants have grave yards and mourn their dead and it would be impossible to name all the speicies that put the life of their children before their own.

And evolution gaurantees self improvment. All species are subject to evolution and therefore all species have some prospect of self improvement.

I once sat down and tried to make a list of all the things that empiraclly seperated Humanity from the animal kingdom. The only things I could think of were that humans create things for entertainment and have currency. Looking back I'm not entirely sure that those are unique to humans either.
Evolution does not guarantee self-improvement. Only adaptability. That is evolution 101. Whales and Dolphins and Birds have communicative SYSTEMS. But any linguist will tell you that it is not language as it lacks syntax, an expansive vocabulary and it can only be applied to a finite amount of situations, while human language can effectively expressive an almost infinite amount of ideas and expressions. This is very basic linguistics.

And when I mean NATURAL life span, I'm talking about the average lifespan. A dog in the wild is very lucky to live more than 5 or 6 years. Dogs which live with humans generally last only 13 to 15 years, and some exceptional cases, dogs can live to about, oh say 20 something years. But that's only when they live with humans, eating processed dog food as well as being close to a vet. In the wild, dogs still live only a short amount of time, and don't live very long.

But humans.... ah now - humans used to live, oh say 30 years of age when we originally evolved. Not a long time. We didn't have processed foods, we didn't have vaccines, and our teeth quickly wore out. 30 years of life was considered pretty damn good. But NOW.... now we can live to 100. In Japan, the average lifespan is approaching a CENTURY. That's 3x more than what we started out with.

Animals cannot improve themselves. They adapt to the world, but as a species, they are stuck with what they've got until evolution gives them something else. With humans, not so. Human beings are the ONLY species which can make a conscious effort to improve themselves beyond what they have, by THEIR OWN WILL. Animals cannot do that. They have no purpose except to reproduce. They are products of biology, physics and chemistry and have no real meaning. They exist, because they exist.

Humans started out the same way. We came into existence with no real meaning. But we, through the sheer intelligence of our minds, MADE our own reason, looked up and dreamed of something better than stupid, pointless, meaningless existence on the plains.

As for animal morality - I can assure you, animals are no saints. Live in the wild - see how animals interact. At least human beings have ideals, even if we mostly fail to live up to them. But we still have those DREAMS. Those dreams of a better world.

And to reiterate - EVOLUTION DOES NOT MEAN IMPROVEMENT. That is one of the least understood aspects of evolutionary biology. Evolution is adaptability to the environment and other species. It is REACTIVE. Not progressive.

I have never seen an animal create a work of art. I have never seen an animal comprehend physics or the movement of alleles in a population. I have never seen an animal, aside from human beings, which can communicate about the past, the future or debate philosophical ideas. Yes there are some apes which know sign language, but the thoughts they express with that sign language (which was invented by humans), are extremely primitive and basic. Animals are far stupider than human beings. No animal has truly mastered a language, as defined by a linguist. I doubt any animal has ever pondered the reason for its existence. I STRONGLY doubt that any animal thinks of anything more than - eat, sleep, reproduce, eat, sleep, reproduce. Their existence is meaningless, because they have no dreams of anything greater than what they are. They have no desire to make their own meaning, no desire to become anything.

Of course, we shouldn't cause pain to animals. Animals can feel pain (they have nerves after all). Nor should we destroy animals (we need the biosphere to survive). But they are not humans. Their lives of a hundred animals is not worth the life of one human.
 

Anomynous 167

New member
May 6, 2008
404
0
0
Random argument man said:
There's a huge difference between stupid and ignorant.

Ignorant: Someone who doesn't know.
Stupid: Someone who prefers to do his own way of thinking and refuse to learn.
You fall under the category of Stupid as you got them mixed up

There are two answers to the question The arrogant says yes we are supreme (I like Meat Lovers and Hawaiians at dominoes). While the moddist will dam his species stupid. A half way intelligent person will hold his answer if not post the most cleiched response. A 3/4 way intelligent person will hold his response in case he is deemed stupid.
All I have managed to do is procrastinate by sounding like some one in the "intelligent discussion" section of another forum who tries to sound smart by saying rhetorical questions.

Now I shall say something rhetoricalish... Depends who you ask.
 

chaostheory

New member
May 14, 2008
73
0
0
Korolev said:
Khedive Rex said:
Korolev said:
As a species we are generally intelligent, and a hell of a lot more intelligent than any other species on the planet. We are the only species with a complex language that has grammar and syntax. We are the only species which has extend its natural lifespan. We are the only species which have comprehended the most fundamental aspects of the universe. We are the only species with philosophy, advanced morality and science. We are the only species which has ANY prospect of self-improvement.
Actually, dolphins and whales communicate with a more complicated language than we do according to a lot of studies.

Countless species have extended their natural life span by adapting to better live around humans. Whether this involves pretending to be dogs (in the case of wolves) so people will give you food, patroling with three people intead of two (in the case of racoons) to ease the act of stealing food, or just making yourself look cuter and more cuddly while around humans (in the case of pigs who before domestication had tusks and wiry hair and now look mostly harmless) so that humans will get rid of all your parasites and generally make your life more pleasent, species are extending their life spans all the time.

As for not grasping the basics how the earth works, Racoons perfer to wash the food they find before they eat it. There would be no reason to do this except to remove germs. Ants build boats which are capable of crossing things like the Mississippi River, I think they would understand properties like boyancy and displacement. There are also the countless species (Crows, Monkeys, ect) who know to use things like gravity in problem solving.

As for animal morality I would point out that just because we don't recognize it doesn't mean it's not there. We can't get people to agree on what is morally correct even amoungst our own species (and there is often violent disagreement on this particular issue), how would we be able to discern what other species view as morally sound or how would we even know that their species had come to any kind of concensus? that being said though, Elephants have grave yards and mourn their dead and it would be impossible to name all the speicies that put the life of their children before their own.

And evolution gaurantees self improvment. All species are subject to evolution and therefore all species have some prospect of self improvement.

I once sat down and tried to make a list of all the things that empiraclly seperated Humanity from the animal kingdom. The only things I could think of were that humans create things for entertainment and have currency. Looking back I'm not entirely sure that those are unique to humans either.
Evolution does not guarantee self-improvement. Only adaptability. That is evolution 101. Whales and Dolphins and Birds have communicative SYSTEMS. But any linguist will tell you that it is not language as it lacks syntax, an expansive vocabulary and it can only be applied to a finite amount of situations, while human language can effectively expressive an almost infinite amount of ideas and expressions. This is very basic linguistics.

And when I mean NATURAL life span, I'm talking about the average lifespan. A dog in the wild is very lucky to live more than 5 or 6 years. Dogs which live with humans generally last only 13 to 15 years, and some exceptional cases, dogs can live to about, oh say 20 something years. But that's only when they live with humans, eating processed dog food as well as being close to a vet. In the wild, dogs still live only a short amount of time, and don't live very long.

But humans.... ah now - humans used to live, oh say 30 years of age when we originally evolved. Not a long time. We didn't have processed foods, we didn't have vaccines, and our teeth quickly wore out. 30 years of life was considered pretty damn good. But NOW.... now we can live to 100. In Japan, the average lifespan is approaching a CENTURY. That's 3x more than what we started out with.

Animals cannot improve themselves. They adapt to the world, but as a species, they are stuck with what they've got until evolution gives them something else. With humans, not so. Human beings are the ONLY species which can make a conscious effort to improve themselves beyond what they have, by THEIR OWN WILL. Animals cannot do that. They have no purpose except to reproduce. They are products of biology, physics and chemistry and have no real meaning. They exist, because they exist.

Humans started out the same way. We came into existence with no real meaning. But we, through the sheer intelligence of our minds, MADE our own reason, looked up and dreamed of something better than stupid, pointless, meaningless existence on the plains.

As for animal morality - I can assure you, animals are no saints. Live in the wild - see how animals interact. At least human beings have ideals, even if we mostly fail to live up to them. But we still have those DREAMS. Those dreams of a better world.

And to reiterate - EVOLUTION DOES NOT MEAN IMPROVEMENT. That is one of the least understood aspects of evolutionary biology. Evolution is adaptability to the environment and other species. It is REACTIVE. Not progressive.

I have never seen an animal create a work of art. I have never seen an animal comprehend physics or the movement of alleles in a population. I have never seen an animal, aside from human beings, which can communicate about the past, the future or debate philosophical ideas. Yes there are some apes which know sign language, but the thoughts they express with that sign language (which was invented by humans), are extremely primitive and basic. Animals are far stupider than human beings. No animal has truly mastered a language, as defined by a linguist. I doubt any animal has ever pondered the reason for its existence. I STRONGLY doubt that any animal thinks of anything more than - eat, sleep, reproduce, eat, sleep, reproduce. Their existence is meaningless, because they have no dreams of anything greater than what they are. They have no desire to make their own meaning, no desire to become anything.

Of course, we shouldn't cause pain to animals. Animals can feel pain (they have nerves after all). Nor should we destroy animals (we need the biosphere to survive). But they are not humans. Their lives of a hundred animals is not worth the life of one human.
Actually humans have been living to around 70 or 80 as far back as we can tell, the average was low because the amount of children that died rather than how old people got before they died. Although the only reason we reach 100+ now is because of modern medicine
 

TerribleTerryTate

New member
Feb 4, 2008
384
0
0
Intelligence and being smart are two different things altogether.
When someone say's 'Smart' to me, I think of common sense. When someone says 'Intelligence' I think of IQ, solving Mathematical equations, Literature, and other such things.
This may be a stereotypical way of looking at it, but it's the first thing I think of.

There is no denying that people on the whole are intelligent. No other species can solve as complex problems or equations, and no other species on the planet could write novels, and other such things.

However, are we smart? - In my view, on the whole; a resounding no. War, poverty, and famine still rampage on, and even though we could probably extinquish these problems, people are too busy pissing on other people's bonfires to really care. As a few people have said already in this thread; people have the potential to be smart, but very few actually are.
 

Dudemeister

New member
Feb 24, 2008
1,227
0
0
The higher the ammount of people, the lower the collective IQ.
This dosen't mean groups of people can't be smart, just that; the majority of people are ignorant and stupid. luckily, not all of them.
 

Johnn Johnston

New member
May 4, 2008
2,519
0
0
Khedive Rex said:
Are we the smartest creatures that have ever lived and the most awesome and the only one worth disscussing? No.
Speak for yourself. I, for one, am the most awesome creature ever.
 

Sylocat

Sci-Fi & Shakespeare
Nov 13, 2007
2,122
0
0
"The fool believes he is wise. The wise man knows he is a fool." ? Shakespeare
 

Royzy

New member
May 18, 2008
21
0
0
Sylocat said:
"The fool believes he is wise. The wise man knows he is a fool." ? Shakespeare
I never liked that man, though his word's do speak the truth.
 

OurGloriousLeader

New member
May 14, 2008
199
0
0
I'm sick of the idea that 'individual humans are smart, people are stupid'. The complete opposite is true. 'Humanity' knows more than any one person can ever know. We can, in an effort to understand, become an expert in a field, get a PHD and contribute to that, then, maybe, at the same time become passably familiar with different fields. But Humanity, right now, is an expert in all fields. Wikipedia is an excellent example. No individual contributor knows that much of a percentage of this vast encyclopaedia, and occasionally there are morons trying to add untruths. But the sum of all that knowledge is huge. And wikipedia is but a small percentage in itself of human knowledge. Jack Cohen and Ian Stewart coined this as 'extelligence', clever eh?

So yes, we are a smart species.
 

Evilbunny

New member
Feb 23, 2008
2,099
0
0
EXPLOSION said:
also, tell me how a cow stupid; standing around in a safe, enclosed paddock, eating, sleeping, socialising and occasionally getting laid. tell me that isn't bliss.
You ever spend time with cows? When I was a child I would go up to my aunt's farm for a few months every summer. One time I was watching the cows outside and it happened to be raining that day. Instead of going under the large section of the pasture with a tin roof over it that my aunt built so she could milk them all day without getting heat stroke, the stupid things decided it would be a better idea to stand there in the rain and moo. My god cows are stupid, I've never encountered another animal so begging to be eaten.
 

Bling Cat

New member
Jan 13, 2008
899
0
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkeh5cVSMtY
there. watch that, then tell me humanity isnt doomed to the furthest depths of oblivion. Hell, that...thing makes us deserve it.