Poll: Are People Inherently Good?

Recommended Videos

aussiesniper

New member
Mar 20, 2008
424
0
0
I'm of the opinion that humans tend to be neutral, but we perform "Good" or "Evil" acts because of our surroundings.
 

sneakypenguin

Elite Member
Legacy
Jul 31, 2008
2,804
0
41
Country
usa
No people are not inherently good, would you without chance of repercussions still be a good person? We are social beings and as such we adhere to certain rules, these being not taking of life unnecessarily, respect of private property among a few others. We are "good" because we wish to remain in the social groups (nation,state,family,friends) So one could say we are "good" out of fear of being an outcast. Which is why many people you see go crazy are the social outcast, they no longer fear the rejection and punishment of their social groups.

/trying to sound like my business ethics professor.
 

Undead Dragon King

Evil Spacefaring Mantis
Apr 25, 2008
1,149
0
0
Marv21 said:
Undead Dragon King said:
I personally follow a hybrid Hobbesian-Lockian philosophy about man and the "state of nature". If you place man on a basic level with no laws or moral teachings whatsoever, he will be self-serving only. That is why we have laws: so that the innate self-centeredness of man can be held in check.

Call me a nihilist, that's just my opinion.
Yes I love the ideas of Hoobes, and Locke, we need laws because men are not angels.

But humans vary differently some genetics make others agressive, and other nice. I perfer to blame evil people on the work of the parents, hope they rot in hell, which ends up the evil people themselves become parents. Its a vicous circle, I don't think we should blame the children, but in the end we kind have to.

Ms. Havisham effect.

Estella wasn't a bad person, she became one, and she got the shit beat out of her by her husband. Not her fault in the end.

Also I love your avatar.

Mai boi! I wonder whats for dinner!
Thanks!

Let me expound a little bit. We need look no further than the slums of big cities today (or in areas of Africa and the Middle East) to see how man exists in relative lawlessness- the State of Nature. What does one see these people do just to survive? Nothing inherently altruistic. Quite the contrary.

I understand that these areas are built on corrupt foundations, but the concept of "might makes right" holds true across thee board in lawless zones. Hobbes and Locke both agreed these ideas.
 

Bowl Full

New member
Dec 29, 2008
107
0
0
Umm. Most people are just bad. There are some good people deep down on the inside, but yeah...
videonerd250 said:
I say both yes and no. People can be born either good or bad, and then that personality either reinforced or diminished, depending on their upbringing.
Agreed.
 

JediMB

New member
Oct 25, 2008
3,094
0
0
People are born... different. Both "nature" and "nurture" turn us into something for people to consider either good or bad.
 

wewontdie11

New member
May 28, 2008
2,661
0
0
meatloaf231 said:
No, I don't think so. Look at children: they have a long, proud history of being completely horrible to one another and small animals.
Pretty much that. If anything I think people are inherently bad and we only become good and gain a sense of moral conscience from conditioning of societies "norms and values". Plus any species that is as efficient at killing as the human race can not claim to be good in my opinion.
 
Jan 9, 2009
127
0
0
aussiesniper said:
I'm of the opinion that humans tend to be neutral, but we perform "Good" or "Evil" acts because of our surroundings.
So what you're saying is that if a person were to walk up to a TV store that was on fire, and the elderly clerk was trapped, they would always run in to steal a TV than help the person?
 

ZeroMachine

New member
Oct 11, 2008
4,397
0
0
People are both good and bad. You'll never find a good person that has never done something bad, or a bad person that has never been kind to anyone.

Me? I have faith in humanity's good side. What I'm losing faith in is humanity's intelligence. But we survive, and as long as we keep surviving without blowing ourselves and the entire planet up, I'll keep on hoping.

EDIT: To answer the question better, yes, I believe people have inherent tendencies to be kind to one another. We can just decide to ignore them more easily then other species.
 

Evilbunny

New member
Feb 23, 2008
2,099
0
0
There is a part of us that tells us to be selfish and untrusting. Those are just our instincts to keep the Human race going. However there is another part of us that tells us to deny that and help others even if it doesn't help us at all. There is good in every human being, just sometimes they are too desperate to listen to their good side or just choose to ignore it.
 

Bob_Bobbington

Senior Member
Oct 27, 2008
645
0
21
Good and Evil are a point of view so how can you realy say someone is born 'good'. In a society such as ours we have a specific set definition of good and bad. If people don't follow the ideal of good then they are labeled bad. To be born good totally depends on the place and people.
 

aussiesniper

New member
Mar 20, 2008
424
0
0
Chips the Magic Dragon said:
aussiesniper said:
I'm of the opinion that humans tend to be neutral, but we perform "Good" or "Evil" acts because of our surroundings.
So what you're saying is that if a person were to walk up to a TV store that was on fire, and the elderly clerk was trapped, they would always run in to steal a TV than help the person?
Because humans are social beings, a neutral person would rescue the clerk. Also, why would anyone want a burning TV?
 

Zeromaxx

Walrus King
Jul 2, 2008
301
0
0
black lincon said:
I hate to roughly quote Dr. Cox but, "people are bastard coated bastards with bastard filling."(yes very rough) If you took away rules people would regress to animal instincts, humans are, at heart, self serving bastards.
Actually that's pretty dead on if I remember correctly. I agree with this, leave 5 children in a room with a bunch of food and water without teaching them anything (though I've no idea how they would survive on it's own or how a caretaker wouldn't instill their values in them) and they'll just serve themselves and probably fight each other.

The only real way to tell this, though, is through one's personal definition of good and evil as some people will look at it and say their trying to survive others will point at a couple kids and say their bastards.
 

Naeo

New member
Dec 31, 2008
968
0
0
Hard for me to say. All the people I've ever met are essentially nice people at the heart of things, but I've met countless people who seem to have absolutely no regard for anything that doesn't help better them.

I'd say people aren't inherently good- they are in general good at the core. They're not inherently evil, though.
 

Jumplion

New member
Mar 10, 2008
7,873
0
0
Gormourn said:
I don't even understand what "general morals" mean. What are they? Should general morals be morals dictated by one of the major religions? Or should it be just sensible stuff worked out of life experiences? Or should it be a cold, scientific approach? Either way, there would be a huge amounts of people taking some side, especially when we're talking about more then one country.
General morals would be, I guess, "Killing is wrong" and "don't steal". But even those morals have "But what if..." situations to them.
 

The Iron Ninja

New member
Aug 13, 2008
2,868
0
0
Are people inherently good?
Well we're humans. We come out of the womb much earlier (in terms of actual development, not the length of time itself) than would be normal for other animals and as such we retain very little in the way of inherent behaviours that you see in nature and have to learn the vast majority of our behaviour from observing the world around us. The likelihood of infants being born with an ingrained need to follow a moral code as set by the society it is born into (that prior to birth it has no knowledge of) seems a tad unlikely.

Also there's this

If this kid was inherently good I'll eat my chef hat.
 

Molten Discharge

New member
Jul 25, 2008
56
0
0
Arguably people only act in a kind way to others in order to further their own goals. It's my view that people have to be "good" in order to get a society that co-operates in order to meet the desires of that society. So, on the grand scale of things I don't think anyone is "good" per say.
 

latenightapplepie

New member
Nov 9, 2008
3,086
0
0
I believe there to be a lot of truth in Freud's 'man is wolf to man' theory. Humans are very capable of doing horrible things to each other. But the social order does its job magnificently and we all pretty much fall in line.