Exactly, my point is, if it's just for a couple of extra little things what's wrong with DLC? for less than a fifth of what we're being expected to pay for a game that is pretty much a clone of the previous two.flaming_squirrel said:Considering that CoD:MW was absolutely awesome I fail to see how the same thing with extra bits will be bad. If you're that against the idea, think of it as an expansion and enjoy it for the extra gameplay alone.Phenakist said:They set themselves up to fail the second they announced the game, it's going to be that same as Cod 4 with a couple of cheap additions stapled onto the side.
I expect some people are set on hating it for the fact that it'll be popular alone, y'know a "I HAVE AN INTERESTING AND DIFFERENT OPINION" kind of thing.
TelHybrid said:Glademaster said:Em your dead wrong there CoD had a fairly big and decent fan base before Call Of Duty 4 with CoD2 being the second most played game on xfire(second to WoW) with CoD2 remaining in third place with CoD4 in second place.TelHybrid said:I say yes definitely.
Let's be honest, before CoD4 not many people thought overly highly of the CoD series. Yeah sure there was a few fans, but it didn't really get the fanbase that it has now until CoD4, purely because CoD4 tried something different to the rest of the series which was to sidestep from the whole (let's face it... generic) World War II setting, which won the adulation of many gamers.
Nobody had high expectations of Call of Duty 4, but after CoD4 the series has a fanbase that expects high standards.
OT:Yes I expect CoD:MW2 will stick to standards I expect from Infinty Ward.
Saying something like MW2 will be like CoD 4.5 is like saying Crash Bandicoot 2 was Crash Bandicoot 1.5 because they are hardly going to change the core aspects of a franchise and besides what could they change it to.
The only people who's expectations it won't live up to are people who think the game will bring about the second coming of Jesus.
Hopefully though they make it more of PC shooter than a console one and less of maps like Creek and Killhouse.
Ok I see what you meant to say I thought you meant to say something different no harm done.TelHybrid said:I don't think I put myself across so well. I know Call of Duty 1 and 2 had fairly big fanbases, but what I mean is the fanbases weren't as big as they started to get with Call of Duty 4. CoD4 got more hype than CoD 1 and 2, and the more hyped games get, the higher the standard gets set for a sequel.
And it's "spelled" expectations.KingTeabag said:Welcome to the Escapist, we are your family now. And you can never leave us. And while your here you may as well learn punctuation and spelling.fat waster said:i think that Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 has set its self up for a big disappointment.
I think that Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 has set itself up for a big dissapointment.
And it's spelt 'expectations'.
Sorry about that, but that's tough love for you.
It would also be pointless, gimmicky and a waste of time compared to what they could be doing.park92 said:they should let you customize what your gonna wear that would be sweet![]()
I really liked World at War, I think its just that everyone was blown away by COD 4 that WAW couldn't compete.AvacuumSALESMAN said:Infinity Ward makes the good CoDs, it's Treyarch that whored the franchise by making all these other bad CoDs like World at War. I don't think Infinity Ward will disappoint with Modern Warfare 2.
Yep, pretty much this. If you liked modern warfare 1 than you most likely will like two.KingTeabag said:If Robert Downling was Peter Molyneux, then i'd say yes.
But no, he isn't is he? He's Robert Dowling, a hyper-cool guy from Infinity Ward.
And those people? They make good games, and just so happened to make one of the greatest online shooters of this generation.
Well, my point is, that as long as the game improves on the original in some way, then it will definately be awesome, no doubt.