Poll: Are There That Many Asexuals Here?

Recommended Videos

DktrAgonizer

New member
Jun 7, 2010
209
0
0
AndyFromMonday said:
There are no asexuals on these forums, period. The thing is, asexuality, like bisexuality, pansexuality and asperger's syndrome before it, is the new "in" thing. It's "cool" to be asexual, it adds depth to your character and makes you more interesting. It's also a great way to justify rejection. What these kids don't understand is that the prevalence of asexuality in the population of Earth is one fucking percent. Let me put that in perspective. The chances of a person on Earth being asexual is lower than the chance of you being hit by a fucking lighting bolt.
Excuse me, but you may want to reread some of the replies in this (and maybe some other) threads. You have no right to claim somebody you don't even know is lying about something like this.

Besides, that percent you quoted was from an outdated study that could not POSSIBLY have been correct anyway, as that would have required the sexuality of everybody to be found out, which is just not possible.

I think it's silly to put percentages on chances of something like sexuality, anyway. People change, people can be unsure for a long time, yadda yaddda yadda.
 

conflictofinterests

New member
Apr 6, 2010
1,098
0
0
ZephyrFireStrom said:
I am asexual.

I take a look at the world and see just how many people are mesmerized by sexuality and I'm sick to my core. The more I think about how pathetic the human race is the more I want to puke. Humans are suppose to evolve not remain as neanderthals for all eternity. Since the beginning of humanity, since the very first neanderthals walked this planet, the human race has failed to change beyond natural instincts. Humans continue to wage pointless wars, argue over irrelevent matters, screw pretty much anything that moves, would rather celebrate for absolutely no reason than do something productive.

I've known what sex means since quite a young age. Ever since then I have understood the meaning and reasoning behind sex. Primary function is to breed children. At first it wasn't such a big deal until the world started taking a turn for the worst and over population became a problem. That was the first straw.

The second straw was finding out how young people began to have sex at. There are no words to describe how disgusted I am about that.

The final straw is when people confuse love with lust. Two people in love with each other permanently for the rest of their lives, that is undoubtedly love. People that have sex with one person one time, few months or so down the line have sex with someone new and repeats said process several times in their life with the primary objective being only to say "I've screwed this many chicks." That's lust and anyone that actually does that needs to be killed.

Since then I've abolished all sex from my existance. Including anything sex related such as hugging, kissing and so forth. I don't allow people to get near me and hug me or even kiss me on the cheek. I'd sooner kill myself than allow corruption to seep into my soul and drag me into a pit of hell that is called the human race.

As a side note I understand that there are many forms of corruption, that I'm well aware of them and abolish them as well.

And as a on topic statement. The majority of people that actually say they're asexual are lying. I'd say one in every few thousand. I would even go as far to say one in every tens of thousands.
I'm sure you've already gotten an ear-full for this post, but I'd just like to point out that I recognize a lot of your concepts from classes I've taken, and they are, for the most part, only partially formed. Might I suggest some research on the topics of anthropology, evolution, philosophy, psychology and literature (classic or modern). Also, this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_that_broke_the_camel's_back
(Hint: The "final straw" a phrase in your rant that actually makes sense)
 

DktrAgonizer

New member
Jun 7, 2010
209
0
0
Regnes said:
I think you're going to find a higher concentration of people with social defects on internet forums, it only makes sense, people with less significant social lives spend more time on internet forums.

You might think that's silly because forums are social places, but the reality is that you yourself are the only real person on an internet forum, everybody else is just a bunch of words on a blank screen.

That being said, I still don't think asexuality is that widespread in this sort of environment, mainly because I think it ridiculous that so many people could be legitimately afflicted with such a serious defect. I think that there are a large amount of youths on forums such as these, and that their still developing selves are in phases of hormonal imbalance resulting in a weakened sexual appetite misdiagnosed as full blown asexuality.
Please don't call asexuality a defect. It's no more a defect than any other type of sexuality (which is to say, it's not one at all). There's nothing wrong with me or any other ace/grey-ace/demi just because we happen to be a little different. Calling it a defect is, uh, really rude. :/
 

Biosophilogical

New member
Jul 8, 2009
3,264
0
0
Dragonizer said:
I, myself, identify as asexual. I've never seen somebody and wished I could have sex with them; the farthest I go is maybe thinking about how it might be to kiss them. Honestly, the act of sex really kind of grosses me out. Whenever I think about it, I just get uncomfortable and a little disturbed. It's not for me, and that's fine.
Bingo. This is me in a nut-shell. However, whenever I say I'm asexual, I like to qualify with a 'for now', because I'm only 18, so I may be a late bloomer, or I may only feel sexy-times-feelings about highly specific I haven't met yet, or I might just have such a low sex-drive I don't notice it, or maybe I simply lacked an obsession with sex during teenage years, so it isn't how I learned to view people (like missing a critical stage in my "How much do I want to penis them?" development).

Alternatively, maybe I just misinterpret how other people view sex. As a teenager recently out of high school, I've seen plenty of people talk about sex for months on end (also Top Gun, drinking, smoking and pot, but bear with me here), and I've never had the desire to do anything even remotely similar to that. So maybe they feel exactly how I do, but they interpret and express it differently, though that would raise the question of how much of our sex drive is actually a natural feeling, and how much is just how we are taught we should feel, though I highly doubt it as I'm sure someone else would have come up with that idea long before this.

So the short version is that I want nothing to do with your genitals/genital-compatible orifices, and I'm not sure if I am a 'true' asexual, or if I'm just going to be late to the party.
 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
Dragonizer said:
Excuse me, but you may want to reread some of the replies in this (and maybe some other) threads. You have no right to claim somebody you don't even know is lying about something like this.
Yeah, I think I'm more than qualified to call bullshit when I see it. Just like the bisexuality fad before this and the asperger's crap before that I've seen it all and this is no different. Just a bunch of angsty teenagers talking about crap they don't understand.

Dragonizer said:
Besides, that percent you quoted was from an outdated study that could not POSSIBLY have been correct anyway, as that would have required the sexuality of everybody to be found out, which is just not possible.
Just like we need to know exactly how many smokers there are in the world to make an estimate on how many of them are going to die of lung cancer. Oh, and by the way, kissing is sexual by nature. Just saying.


Dragonizer said:
People change, people can be unsure for a long time
Aha, just like how homosexuals suddenly become heterosexuals for no reason at all. It couldn't possibly be that they weren't homosexuals in the first place but fuck, what the hell do I know right?
 

Malconvoker

New member
Nov 1, 2011
86
0
0
I identify as asexual and have for years. Nothing has ever gotten any response from me. I knew I wasn't interested in men or women since I was about 13 but only learned what the term for that is(asexuality) when I was 18 when I described my views of sex to a friend as being a gross act performed by other people.

I'm 21 now and am a proud virgin. I've never had sex, never want it, have never needed it. I could point to someone and say that "they are attractive" but I would never say "I think they are attractive."

To me, sex is something other people do. I don't care for it and would rather stories about romances and stuff end in a kiss than a bed. I can see how some people may think of sex as the ultimate form of trust but to me it is unnecessary.
 

Erana

New member
Feb 28, 2008
8,010
0
0
ZephyrFireStrom said:
Told you humans are mindless.
Welcome to the internet, sweetheart. If you want this point to be further proven, I have some youtube links that could help.

AndyFromMonday said:
"i What these kids don't understand is that the prevalence of asexuality in the population of Earth is one fucking percent. Let me put that in perspective. The chances of a person on Earth being asexual is lower than the chance of you being hit by a fucking lighting bolt.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said:
"Odds of being struck in your lifetime (Est. 80 years) 1/10,000"
Um... Wanna run that math by me one more time?

But yeah, I'm asexual, and with no sexual feelings. And I've been through in my coming to this conclusion, because every little thing could contribute to my anomalous health issues. Part of the matter is that apparently I'm hypersensitive to certain lady hormones which are known to decrease libido, but that's just how I've been all my life, and there's really not much anything to be done to change that. Everyone's normal is different, after all.
And no, I happen to not be interested in a relationship at this point, but right now I don't really crave attention. I wouldn't ever say that asexuals can't have relationships. though.

I know a lot of people do lie about it, and it does annoy me, because as such an unknown orientation, the last thing I want is morons to misrepresent this group and be the ones to make the first impression onto general culture. I'm often as skeptical as the OP on this matter, because so many people do seem to confuse asexuality with chastity, or worse, say "functionally asexual" in all the wrong situations. Or, of course, misappropriate the term as people do aspergers or bipolar or anything like that.
 

Olas

Hello!
Dec 24, 2011
3,226
0
0
I kinda think asexuality is a myth, or at least an extreme exageration. From an evolutionary standpoint our sexual drives are extremely important. A creature without a sexual orientation is essentially useless to the species.

I'll bet most supposed asexuals on this site are really just misanthropes who like to think they're above these tasteless animalistic human urges that dominate the rest of their species. But it's not something you can choose, it's a biological condition.
In the outside world sex = cool, but the escapist community is more civilized so that for some sex = uncouth. So certain escapists try to distance themselves from sex and latch onto asexuality as an excuse.

Really though I'm in favor of anything that makes human life more enjoyable. While I believe romance is pretty stupid, and don't see sexuality as anything magical, I know that it does make life better.
 

Agayek

Ravenous Gormandizer
Oct 23, 2008
5,178
0
0
Dragonizer said:
Please don't call asexuality a defect. It's no more a defect than any other type of sexuality (which is to say, it's not one at all). There's nothing wrong with me or any other ace/grey-ace/demi just because we happen to be a little different. Calling it a defect is, uh, really rude. :/
Any type of sexuality that does not directly contribute to the propagation of the species (read: anything not heterosexual), is a defect and an aberration.

It's nothing to be ashamed of or angered by, it's simply biological fact. In no way does that imply those who fall into such a category are "lesser", simply that they are a departure from the norm and suffer from a biological defect.

It's much the same way an albinoism is a defect. No one can control it, and it doesn't make one any less of a person, but it does prevent you from performing the most basic function of all living beings.
 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
Erana said:
Um... Wanna run that math by me one more time?
That doesn't change anything. The fact of the matter is, inborn asexuality is way to rare to account for the tens of people here claiming they're asexual. Much more likely they suffer from an actual problem ranging anywhere from hyperthyroidism to teenage angst.
 

axlryder

victim of VR
Jul 29, 2011
1,862
0
0
I don't think there are all that many asexuals, but I do think that some people have sexual idiosyncrasies (physiologically rooted or otherwise) that are similar to asexuality and simply find it easier to identify themselves as asexual than go through a whole song and dance to explain their particular relationship with sex. I have my own issues with it, and while I'm not asexual at all, I've identified myself as asexual when I felt it to be equivalent to my own condition in a specific context for brevity's sake (though never on these forums).
 

DktrAgonizer

New member
Jun 7, 2010
209
0
0
AndyFromMonday said:
Yeah, I think I'm more than qualified to call bullshit when I see it. Just like the bisexuality fad before this and the asperger's crap before that I've seen it all and this is no different. Just a bunch of angsty teenagers talking about crap they don't understand.
Regardless, it really isn't fair for you to say what I know I am is just a fad. I've never had an interest in sex, and it's not just because I haven't "met the right person" or some bullshit. Like I said, I'm sure there are people who are lying for some reason, but it's not fair to assume that everybody is.

AndyFromMonday said:
Just like we need to know exactly how many smokers there are in the world to make an estimate on how many of them are going to die of lung cancer. Oh, and by the way, kissing is sexual by nature. Just saying.
So? Some asexuals may find romanctic gestures such as kissing and hugging to be fine, whereas the act is sex is disgusting. I'm one such person. Others may despise physical intimacy in all forms. Being fine with kissing does not mean you're suddenly not an asexual.

AndyFromMonday said:
Aha, just like how homosexuals suddenly become heterosexuals for no reason at all. It couldn't possibly be that they weren't homosexuals in the first place but fuck, what the hell do I know right?
Except that research shows that sexuality can be fluid. I'm not saying people suddenly hop from one to another, but they may change their sexual identity based on experiences they get as they get older. Not everybody stays the same, for various reasons. Hell, I myself used to think the idea of kissing other girls was gross. Now, sometimes I think it'd be nice to do that if I wanted (which I currently won't, as I have a boyfriend, but still.)

Agayek said:
Any type of sexuality that does not directly contribute to the propagation of the species (read: anything not heterosexual), is a defect and an aberration.

It's nothing to be ashamed of or angered by, it's simply biological fact. In no way does that imply those who fall into such a category are "lesser", simply that they are a departure from the norm and suffer from a biological defect.

It's much the same way an albinoism is a defect. No one can control it, and it doesn't make one any less of a person, but it does prevent you from performing the most basic function of all living beings.
Okay, going on thinking that I guess, but it doesn't change the fact that calling it a defect or an aberration sounds really, really rude. At least, it is to me.
 

Random Fella

New member
Nov 17, 2010
1,167
0
0
Radelaide said:
Asexuality, imo, is a total farce. Just because you have a low sex drive, doesn't mean you are asexual. It means that you don't have the same level of desire to go out and hump things as the next person.
No, It's an actual way of sexuality. They have almost no sex drive so in a way you're correct, but you're just desribing Asexuality.

As for on this website, perhaps there is more than the average Asexuals around, the same with outward homosexuals and bi-sexuals. But I don't think it's as high as people would think with asexuality, because looking at posts people make it looks around 5-10% which is too high, perhaps some of them may just be saying they are Asexual as an excuse, but I really don't know the truth to the matter, but in my opinion I would pick the first option.
 
Sep 8, 2010
157
0
0
Hap2 said:
What? Accidentally getting pregnant and STI's not a factor?

Aside from the henpecking, some people, whether you believe it or not, are bored by sex, stressed by it, and some are even pained by it. I've experimented, and I still do not enjoy sex, it's not an activity I have any interest in aside from its philosophical implications. I have no natural interest in people in that way.

Throughout high school I was confused as to what it meant to want sex, and I still don't understand very well. But I don't dismiss that many people genuinely like and want sex. Perhaps you're in a similar position, but on the opposite side of the spectrum?
A lot of us have a hard time understanding asexuals, and many people simply cannot accept what they don't understand. Add to this the fact that asexuality is abnormal (not being judgemental here; it's simply not the "default" for sexually mature humans or we wouldn't even exist) and you can see why people might be hostile.

I really don't have an issue with people who are asexual, myself. I love sex and I can't understand not being interested in it, but I don't begrudge people not being interested.

I think another reason people tend to be hostile towards asexuals is that a LOT of them seem to put themselves up on a pedestal, largely for the same reasons; they don't understand why anyone would want to have sex, and they feel like it's gross, so people that like it are somehow less evolved or something. So for the record, asexuals: If you insist people are somehow sick, wrong, immature, or whatever for enjoying sex, you are just as much of an unreasonable dick as someone who insists that you 'can't be asexual'.
 

InsanityRequiem

New member
Nov 9, 2009
700
0
0
AndyFromMonday said:
Erana said:
Um... Wanna run that math by me one more time?
That doesn't change anything. The fact of the matter is, inborn asexuality is way to rare to account for the tens of people here claiming they're asexual. Much more likely they suffer from an actual problem ranging anywhere from hyperthyroidism to teenage angst.
And what do you say of people past the age of 25 that are asexual? Your posts sound, to me and a few others I'd surmise, just like the religious nut jobs that say Homo/Bisexuality does not exist and is a choice. Maybe you should read TVTropes about Asexuality, since it's actually quite detailed and points out a lot of things in regards to asexuality. Here's the link: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Asexuality

We have next to no understanding of the human brain when we get to the nitty-gritty. Sexuality is part of it. My hormones tell me what's attractive and what's not. Just like your hormones tell you what's attractive and what's not. Mine just say that neither men nor women are attractive physically. And if you look at Humanity and how many people are on this planet (Roughly 7 billion I believe), then you do not have any sort of right to say that 100% of humanity is attractive to physical appearance.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
As an asexual I'd like to point out an error in your post OP, it's not psychological. I don't know or care the numbers of asexuals I just know how I feel isn't appointed to anything mental. I've had blood tests, it's nothing to do with low testosterone or too high estrogen, it's just genuine lack of care for sex, I've had girlfriends, I've had sex, I've had no interest in men I can tell you from the numerous art classes involving naked individuals.

I just don't care for that kind of intimacy or being with someone in a relationship and would rather do a round of gaming or art honestly. And as far as age? That probably has a lot to do with it, when my brother told me even when I was teen he knew something was up with how I acted.

Edit: And for those opening their mouths like they know something calling it an act or some chemistry muck up, why not do some research before you say something incredibly stupid. It's not a choice, it's not low sex drive and if that's what you're getting on a soapbox broadcasting well you really know nothing and shouldn't be talking about such things. So do yourself a favor, research before you say something you know nothing about.
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
Wasnt buying it before. Nothings really changed. Still not buying it one way or another.



Hap2 said:
getting pregnant and STD's ?
Isnt that like two of the same things?

 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
Dragonizer said:
Regardless, it really isn't fair for you to say what I know I am is just a fad.
Just like people KNEW they had asperger's. I mean, if you know you have it then who am I to call bullshit right?

Dragonizer said:
I've never had an interest in sex
Except kissing but kissing isn't sexual at all right?

Dragonizer said:
So? Some asexuals may find romanctic gestures such as kissing and hugging to be fine
Kissing is sexual BY NATURE. You can't say "I hate sex" but then immediately state you enjoy acts that are sexual by fucking nature.

Dragonizer said:
the act is sex is disgusting.
That's not asexuality, that's HSDD or sexual aversion disorder.

Dragonizer said:
Except that research shows that sexuality can be fluid.
Research done by the magic pixies of acid land?

Dragonizer said:
. I'm not saying people suddenly hop from one to another, but they may change their sexual identity based on experiences they get as they get older.
Wrong again. If you're gay, you're gay for the rest of your life. If you suddenly feel the need to shove your dick somewhere other than a guy's ass then you're bisexual.

Dragonizer said:
which I currently won't, as I have a boyfriend, but still.
Wait, you have a boyfriend? You do realize you've just shot yourself in the foot twice already?
 
Sep 8, 2010
157
0
0
Dragonizer said:
AndyFromMonday said:
Yeah, I think I'm more than qualified to call bullshit when I see it. Just like the bisexuality fad before this and the asperger's crap before that I've seen it all and this is no different. Just a bunch of angsty teenagers talking about crap they don't understand.
Regardless, it really isn't fair for you to say what I know I am is just a fad. I've never had an interest in sex, and it's not just because I haven't "met the right person" or some bullshit. Like I said, I'm sure there are people who are lying for some reason, but it's not fair to assume that everybody is.
Ok, totally agree there; this guy is talking out of his ass. I wish the "Douchebag blowhard who thinks he knows everything" fad would die out, that's for sure.

Dragonizer said:
AndyFromMonday said:
Just like we need to know exactly how many smokers there are in the world to make an estimate on how many of them are going to die of lung cancer. Oh, and by the way, kissing is sexual by nature. Just saying.
So? Some asexuals may find romanctic gestures such as kissing and hugging to be fine, whereas the act is sex is disgusting. I'm one such person. Others may despise physical intimacy in all forms. Being fine with kissing does not mean you're suddenly not an asexual.
I just want to say something here: It's totally ok for you to be like that, but it is NOT ok for you to date someone who wants a sexual relationship unless you're both ok with them getting sex elsewhere. Some asexuals do that, and those people are selfish bastards. It's just something that comes up a LOT and I wanted to point that out. If any asexuals out there want a completely monogamous, romantic relationship, then you should date other asexuals.

AndyFromMonday said:
Aha, just like how homosexuals suddenly become heterosexuals for no reason at all. It couldn't possibly be that they weren't homosexuals in the first place but fuck, what the hell do I know right?
Uh, nothing, pretty much. You are making it abundantly clear that you know nothing.

Dragonizer said:
Agayek said:
Any type of sexuality that does not directly contribute to the propagation of the species (read: anything not heterosexual), is a defect and an aberration.

It's nothing to be ashamed of or angered by, it's simply biological fact. In no way does that imply those who fall into such a category are "lesser", simply that they are a departure from the norm and suffer from a biological defect.

It's much the same way an albinoism is a defect. No one can control it, and it doesn't make one any less of a person, but it does prevent you from performing the most basic function of all living beings.
Okay, going on thinking that I guess, but it doesn't change the fact that calling it a defect or an aberration sounds really, really rude. At least, it is to me.
It is abberant in that it is not the default human behavior. It's ok to be that way, so long as you don't make the mistake of thinking that all those people having sex are the ones who are deviating from the norm.