No, bad Leon! Bad! Don't make me sick Chase on you.LeonLethality said:Nope as mentioned in the second response we are one year short of a new decade.
No, bad Leon! Bad! Don't make me sick Chase on you.LeonLethality said:Nope as mentioned in the second response we are one year short of a new decade.
2000 = 1 yearFathoms said:2009 minus 2000 is 9, not 10. simple math, really... the last day of 1999 was the last day of that decade, and as such, the last day in the year 2010 is the last day of the decade, being that it will have been 10 years since that day.SantoUno said:YES, and I'm already tired of people questioning it.
The decade official started in 2000, so 2000-2009 = 10 years, a god damn decade. We are now in the 2nd decade of the 21st century.
Does your calendar go back to year 1? woooow... Strictly the first year was the year leading up to year 1, right?TheNamlessGuy said:Ok, correction:benoitowns said:Unfortunately the first year wasn't year one.
The first year in our calendar is year 1
Correct. Channel 9 had a show on about The Noughties and it was called "the previous decade."Trivun said:The Noughties were from 2000-2009, and now the next decade (whatever we end up calling it) is from 2010-2019.
Sorry, I was just kidding around><^^TheNamlessGuy said:'Calendar' is meant like our measurement of time.Miki91 said:Does your calendar go back to year 1? woooow... Strictly the first year was the year leading up to year 1, right?
You know, the Aztecs, and their calendar (ending in 2012)?
That started at year 1
[sub]And we don't know exactly how old the Earth is, so until we do we can't count beyond year one[/sub]
...no. The first year of AD in the Gregorian calendar would have been 0, so it would the decade would end in 9. Because 2000 was the start of the noughties, 2009 was the end.TheNamlessGuy said:Yes... or no if you think about it...
I mean, a decade is 10 years, and the first year was year 1, therefor the first decade would end at year 11, and so forth...
So no.
No. It's not that simple. You're not counting the fact that 2009 is a whole year, so it's really 2010-2000. Which equals 10.Fathoms said:2009 minus 2000 is 9, not 10. simple math, reallySantoUno said:YES, and I'm already tired of people questioning it.
The decade official started in 2000, so 2000-2009 = 10 years, a god damn decade. We are now in the 2nd decade of the 21st century.
Again, no, you're "simple maths" have failed you, or the other way around. The last day of 2009 is the end of the decade, because 2009 is a full year, remember?The last day of 1999 was the last day of that decade, and as such, the last day in the year 2010 is the last day of the decade, being that it will have been 10 years since that day.
THERE WAS NO YEAR ZERObenoitowns said:Unfortunately the first year wasn't year one.TheNamlessGuy said:Yes... or no if you think about it...
I mean, a decade is 10 years, and the first year was year 1, therefor the first decade would end at year 11, and so forth...
So no.
hah, okTheNamlessGuy said:Ditto.Miki91 said:Sorry, I was just kidding around><^^
I'm just really bored and keep forgetting that sarcasm can't be heard over the net
This.benoitowns said:Unfortunately the first year wasn't year one.TheNamlessGuy said:Yes... or no if you think about it...
I mean, a decade is 10 years, and the first year was year 1, therefor the first decade would end at year 11, and so forth...
So no.