Fair enough. I suppose in movie standards they're relatively realistic.theonlyblaze2 said:By realistic action, I mean that the guns leave believable wounds(no pistol blowing off heads), shots are missed, and the guys RELOAD!Carboncrown said:A part of their attraction, at least for me, comes from the fact that they're old, kinda like proper bonds... But more importantly I just can't see someone making a new good western mo-That's a western? Oh, everyone just ignore what I said above.mindlesspuppet said:And yes, they are still relevant; No Country for Old Men comes to mind.Um, like the Mexican standoff? Now maybe you refer to something else, but the that's the first thing that comes to my mind when mentioning action in westerns, along with just rapidly shooting a revolver from that era and the ending of The Wild Bunch.theonlyblaze2 said:Westerns are some of the better films to come out of Hollywood. They have character development, realistic action, and an actual good story, which is like the Golden Fleece in movies today.
...but not really ;D