Poll: Are you a feminist?

Recommended Videos

Catrixa

New member
May 21, 2011
209
0
0
Urgh, I feel like every time this topic is wheeled out (and I've read quite a few more of these threads than I've commented on), for all people involved (feminists, humanists, baconists [that'd be equal rights for bacon, damnit], masculinists, equalists, or whatever you happen to decide you're for) about 50% of them want to have a rational discussion and about 50% of them want to tell their respective opposing faction just how much of an ass they're being, and how the former individual's opinion is right without a shadow of a doubt.

OT: I consider myself a feminist. I like rights for me. I don't like people telling me who I'm supposed to be based on my gender. This has gotten to the point where whenever someone decides what is female, I don't usually fall in the jurisdiction of the standard definition. I mean, I have all the parts. They work (-ish), although I guess I haven't tested my ability to produce children. But I like math, grew up playing with pretend swords, I dislike wearing makeup or revealing clothing, I like video games, I don't like healer classes (I've just started warming up to the medic in TF2, but I've hated every healer in every MMO ever, and this is not from a lack of trying. I just can't get into making health bars go up when it's so damn satisfying to make them go away), I don't like clothes shopping (unless under very specific circumstances, i.e. with exactly two unique human beings), I like Lego shopping/computer part shopping/video game shopping/action figure shopping/comic book shopping/anime convention shopping, I hate shoe shopping (under all conditions. Of course, I've worked in that department before, too. No one likes shoe shopping. No one. It's a hellhole of negativity), and I like collectible card games despite the fact that they eat absolutely all of my money. I could go on. Really. For every list of "girls are genetically predisposed to like X" I can think of at least a few reasons why I must not be a freaking girl.

On that note, as was the conclusion of a 5am argument I had with a friend: yeah, men and women are genetically different. But I don't think we're vastly different. I think a lot of the difference is socially ingrained. I think that's the part we need to change. No need to fix whatever genetic part is different, but it would help to accommodate some of that (like women who want to be firefighters aren't necessarily weaker than men, they might just be more adept at carrying things on a different part of their body from men). As for what, exactly, is the genetic extent of our personalities, I think we'll never know for certain as long as we don't engage in the forbidden experiment (and aren't able to completely unravel the purpose of every gene in our DNA). I could even be horribly wrong and all women are the way they are due to completely genetic reasons and I'm just making myself miserable by fighting against them. But I like to think I actually like the things I enjoy. And I like to think that people's perceptions of things are more powerful than the reality of the actual things (this goes both ways: the fact that men are ignored in custody battles can be downright tragic sometimes; just because men are seen as less nurturing does not make this truth).

As far as terms with negative connotations: "gamer" has those. I take it anyway. I like games. There should be nothing wrong with that. I think I should have the right to be whatever it is I want to. There is nothing wrong with that either; terms be damned.

TL;DR: This post is long and ranty. Sorry for the page dump.
 

BiscuitTrouser

Elite Member
May 19, 2008
2,860
0
41
Im an equalist. Or whatever. I think everyone deserves basic equal human rights because for fucks sake people everyone fucking thinks this and if anyone thinks you deserve to be treated worse or better based on stupid things like race, gender or pubic hair colour that person tends to be a cretin and we all fucking know this. Seriously. Im tired of this discussion. Vitrol and hatred on a scale ive never seen come wheeling out over definitions and technicalities and im tired. Who cares. Seriously. Who cares about those stupid things.

I, like basically 90% of all humans, obviously know equal rights for all is good and right. You can call it equalist. You can call it feminist. You can call it masculinist. You can call it shit-in-mouth-dumb-fuckery. What you label my views is irrelivant to me and links me in no way to others who recieve this label. Maybe in your eyes. But not to myself. And in the end isnt that what matters the most? Fuck labels. Vote for equal rights, treat others with equal rights and think whatever you want free of these weird arguement inducing names. Just DO stuff. Just be FAIR to others. Anyone with half a brain can tell its not fair that there are differences in gender. Just dont contribute to them. Teach your kids not to. Thats the best think you can do. If someone wants to group it or pigeon hole it thats their business. Dont make it yours. And dont wall others out for not wanting YOUR specific label. Because its all the same stuff people. Its all the same stuff.

TLDR: If you want to call me that then why the fuck not.
 

maturin

New member
Jul 20, 2010
702
0
0
SecretNegative said:
I call bullshit, as do a lot of people on this forum.
Calling bullshit. Sure is easier than refuting arguments, amiright?

But you go on, keep believing that women are universally hated and maybe you can get a few sympathy points on the backwater of the the internet.
If you look up the meaning of 'universal,' you will find that it doesn't apply to the figure of 45%. And I don't think most of the 45% hate women, in fact they probably like them quite a bit, so long as they don't make any troublesome noises about equality and human dignity and activate your pathetic adolescent persecution complex.

PS, I'm a man.

Now now we all know the Tropes vs women thing doesnt prove that the majority of men are sexist pigs, just male gamers.
Naturally. I was referring to the poll results on this website.

And there are plenty of people who do believe in equal rights and aren't feminists, fancy that.
They're feminists and don't know it or deny it, just like there are so many sexists on this website that deny it.
 

Cheesepower5

New member
Dec 21, 2009
1,142
0
0
Suki_ said:
Father Time said:
Can't tell if you're serious but in case you aren't

Youtube is not a gaming community, and cherry picking a few quotes does not mean you get to blanket statements against all of them especially when a lot of people were attacking the trolls.
Its not just youtube the exact same thing happened on this website as well. Do you also honestly expect me to believe that all of those sexist comments about a video about GAMING were not coming from gamers? Or that those people on GAMING websites were not actually gamers? Your post is so rediculous its not even funny.
There was quite a backlash against the comments made to that Sarkeesian fellow. Even most people who disagree with her assertions thought "Yeah that's fucking stupid" about the idiotic rape comments and XBOX live level douchebaggery.

Some sexists = male gamers.
Not all male gamers = sexist.

Lurn2distinguish
 

Seneschal

Blessed are the righteous
Jun 27, 2009
561
0
0
Dasick said:
It's funny that you(she) mention(s) a "fictional world where genders are already equal". Because in her "Tropes vs Women" videos she is arguing that even in the fictional worlds, there still exists a wedge between the genders (as seen by the use of tropes). So which is it?
What? No, she doesn't. "Sexist fictional worlds" was never an issue, otherwise people would be up in arms about Westeros and the GoT series, even if sexism is essential for the story. Now, from what I understand, Tropes vs. Women is meant to describe how gaming only offers a male-centered perspective, and female characters often conform to tropes meant to appeal to the male audience. Most female protagonists suffer no sexism in their respective fictional worlds, because they're ass-kicking lollipop-licking sexy engines of destruction; however, in the context of the real world, such depictions are sexist because they rely only on sex appeal towards males, and exclude and alienate every other demographic. In addition, the industry offers few alternatives.

Dasick said:
Single-dimension villains are a result of bad writing. Sure, it says something about something else that a feminazi is an instantly recognizable and acceptable target, but eliminating the stereotype will only shift the perception of who is an acceptable target.

In my opinion, the real solution is demanding better writing. And I agree with you in a sense; shitty writing in children's shows is a really horrible thing for our society. (I personally believe cartoons to be the ultimate test of one's writing ability; we have far too many people failing)
Agreed that children's shows deserve far more attention than they are given, and that bad writing is the main concern. But I don't think the feminazi is recognizable because she's a real, ubiquitous threat to gender equality (as she is presented in the shows) - how many male rights have been infringed upon in the last half-century? How much have men "lost" due to the feminist movement, exactly? What damage has been done to gender equality that would prove the existence of feminazi oppression? I really find it hard to believe that the feminazi is anything but a defence mechanism that we erect when we feel some of our long-standing man-privileges are under attack, or when we are being forced to take a woman seriously.

Dasick said:
Have you never heard a woman say something along the lines of "all men are pigs" based on something her boyfriend/husband did? It's not really "feminism"(as some perceive it) or reverse-sexism or any other form of "ism"s. It's just a result of human nature. We tend to simplify things, and exaggerate them based on our emotions.
Why would a woman saying "all men are pigs" be representative of an entire movement? And why would that largely meaningless and colloquial statement somehow make it okay to have gender inequality? Regardless of whether all women think "men are pigs", and all men think "women are whores", the end result is a world where women are under-represented and under-appreciated in politics, science, technology, legal matters, health and overall quality of life. You can't just shrug that problem off under "human nature."

SecretNegative said:
The hell?

I made my comment in about page 11, the hell have you been doing?

Anyways, her argument are easily defeated, she has no evidence to her support her claims, she tries to be funny but she fails, you don't seem to respond to arguments in my post, you make weird claims and don't seem to bring any point to this topic.

I have no wish to debate you you, goodbye.
...It's an internet forum, not a live debate. Your presence isn't required, and I'm not posting for you. Plus, the topic is 3 days old, I'm not necroposting or anything.
 

itsthesheppy

New member
Mar 28, 2012
722
0
0
misterprickly said:
In it's current state... No.

Feminism has changed so much from its original cause (equal rights) and is now the very thing that it used to despise IE: a form of sexism.

I still remember how the feminist community verbally attacked Gloria Steinem when she got married saying that she was betraying the movement.
They all did? I'm not aware personally of any feminists who claim that marriage is bad or that relationships with men are bad. Or even that all men are necessarily inherently bad. And I follow quite a few. Networks of them, even.
 

Cheesepower5

New member
Dec 21, 2009
1,142
0
0
Suki_ said:
Cheesepower5 said:
There was quite a backlash against the comments made to that Sarkeesian fellow. Even most people who disagree with her assertions thought "Yeah that's fucking stupid" about the idiotic rape comments and XBOX live level douchebaggery.

Some sexists = male gamers.
Not all male gamers = sexist.

Lurn2distinguish
Nobody said all male games.

Lurn2read
Suki_ said:
Now now we all know the Tropes vs women thing doesnt prove that the majority of men are sexist pigs, just male gamers.
I suppose you didn't specify all, but it certainly sounded that way. In any case, I suppose that means I have no issue, if you're willing to acknowledge it's a deeper issue than happening to have Y chromosome and happening to enjoy video games.
 

mrdude2010

New member
Aug 6, 2009
1,315
0
0
I believe feminism is correct but there is no way in hell I would ever identify myself with the feminazis. They're more sexist than half of the misogynists they're working against.
 

Calibanbutcher

Elite Member
Nov 29, 2009
1,702
8
43
lisadagz said:
A lot of people seem to be saying that men's rights aren't a feminist issue. Of course they are. Any unequal rights between men and women are a result of gender roles, which is something that feminists try to break down.

Men aren't allowed custody of their children because women win by default? A result of women being seen as child rearers while the men don't have to have anything to do with them: a sexist notion that feminists should address.

Men aren't allowed to hit women or speak up when women hit men? A result of men being seen as stronger than women: a sexist notion that feminists should address.

Even if a woman doesn't even like men very much, she ought to be breaking down these stereotypes for the sake of women as well as men.

Crono1973 said:
Circumcision Removes the Most Sensitive Parts of the Penis
A sensitivity study of the adult penis in circumcised and uncircumcised men shows that the uncircumcised penis is significantly more sensitive. The most sensitive location on the circumcised penis is the circumcision scar on the ventral surface. Five locations on the uncircumcised penis that are routinely removed at circumcision are significantly more sensitive than the most sensitive location on the circumcised penis.
In addition, the glans (head) of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The tip of the foreskin is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis, and it is significantly more sensitive than the most sensitive area of the circumcised penis. Circumcision removes the most sensitive parts of the penis.
This study presents the first extensive testing of fine touch pressure thresholds of the adult penis. The monofiliment testing instruments are calibrated and have been used to test female genital sensitivity.
http://www.circumcision.org/studies.htm

http://www.norm-uk.org/circumcision_lost.html

Plenty more links for your Googling pleasure.
I don't agree with circumcision but the sensitivity issue is panicked about more than necessary, I think. Having been in relationships with uncircumcised guys and a circumcised guy, the latter didn't suffer from pain or uncomfortable over stimulation (which also lead to premature ejaculation problems in one of the former) and generally seemed to enjoy himself a lot more, so lessening the sensitivity can be a blessing in some cases.
While I don't think this is a reason to go around cutting up babies, trying to compare a man with not too much sexual sensitivity to a woman with no sexual sensitivity at all is perhaps not the most reliable argument.
Juust a second:
PAIN during intercourse is not a common problem, neither with circumcised nor with uncircumcised guys. He might have some other issues.
And you do realize, that cutting of a woman's "foreskin", aka the hood covering the clitoris does not mean "no sensitivity", only lessened sensitivity in that specific area?
 

jurnag12

New member
Nov 9, 2009
460
0
0
Well, going by that definition, yes. But I've never really done anything to actively promote the whole equality thing besides just abiding by it myself.