Poll: Assassins Creed 4! Already?

Recommended Videos

PAGEToap44

New member
Jul 16, 2008
1,242
0
0
So it appears Ubisoft have announced a pirate themed Assassins Creed 4 recently, called 'Black Flag'. What are your thoughts guys? I personally can't wait for the numerous naval battles bound to take centre stage in this sequel.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-02-28-assassins-creed-4-black-flag-confirmed-by-ubisoft-has-60-minutes-exclusive-gameplay-on-ps3

http://uk.ign.com/articles/2013/03/01/breaking-down-everything-we-know-about-assassins-creed-4

PS. I haven't found anything else about this on the forums, apologies if I'm late to the party.
 

piinyouri

New member
Mar 18, 2012
2,708
0
0
It is strange considering they've kept the subtitles almost always reserved for spinoffs up until now.
 

OpticalJunction

Senior Member
Jul 1, 2011
599
6
23
imahobbit4062 said:
I don't get why it's titled IV and not just a spin off...which it seems to be judging by the Naval theme considering the praise III got for it.
Maybe because they plan to use a new protagonist for it, and if they made it a spinoff they'd be obliged to stick with Connor à la Ezio and his various spinoffs.
 

Dandark

New member
Sep 2, 2011
1,706
0
0
I just finished AC3 today and look forward to this. The naval battles were pretty fun and it will be nice to play as an assassin without needing to worry about the overarching plot with Desmond.

Hopefully they will start going back to other times now, I'd love to see some assassin games based in the Mongol conquest, Feudal Japan, the hundred years war etc
There is so much they could use.
 

DionysusSnoopy

New member
May 9, 2009
136
0
0
Sack of Cheese said:
I think each numbered title means a new protagonist. AC1 = Altair, AC2 = Ezio, AC3 = Connor.
It does I read it in an interview article. I think it was on destructoid but i'm not sure.
The development team has a rule along the lines of 'The game gets a new number when it gets a new protagonist' coincidently it is also the first game of the series to have a number and sub-title in the title.
 

Random Argument Man

New member
May 21, 2008
6,011
0
0
Looking forward to it. I'm just hoping the cities will be more fun to do parkour.

Dr.Panties said:
Worst AAA franchise of the current gen, in my humble bundle of opinions.
I disagree.....A lot...It's your right to disagree, but....I....Worst franchise? no.

The effort put in between historians and designers to recreate an atmosphere unlike any others.
The free running and the jumping roof to roof in a flow like any other.
A feud in history between two ideals that can really push a good debate on philosophy.
And many other stuff.

I seriously love this franchise. Even in its worst efforts, it tried to bring new ideas to the table or at least work with old ones. Every game has something the other ones can't say they have. Sure, it has flaws. However, I can think of several military shooter franchises who haven't tried anything new or just polish the same game over and over again.

The only thing that I would want is to have more time to develop than a year.
 

Maximum Bert

New member
Feb 3, 2013
2,149
0
0
Wow it seems like they are milking this franchise hard, anyway I probably wont get it I didnt like 1 and didnt think much of 2 I must admit that the setting has me more interested than usual though so I will wait and see before making a final decision but it would have to be something pretty special before I invested my money in the series again.
 

Vault Citizen

New member
May 8, 2008
1,703
0
0
I might get it but it will need to get good reviews or be on sale for me to do so. Another major factor for me is whether or not it continues the
Juno is now free story line
 

Rickin10

New member
Mar 16, 2013
79
0
0
One can only hope that this one actually has some thought and care put into it, unlike the hand-holdy, buggy, bloated mess that AC 3 was.

Would also be nice if the game actually had some basic stealth mechanics (this is a game with 'assassin' in the title,right?) and AI that wasn't utterly retarded.
 

spartandude

New member
Nov 24, 2009
2,721
0
0
Il do what ive done with the first 4 AC games so far, but them when they are about £20 on amazon, still waiting for number 3 to drop to that

i mean ive had alot of fun with them all so far but im not paying full price for them. also ive brought none of the dlc for them
 

fezgod

New member
Dec 7, 2012
120
0
0
Maximum Bert said:
Wow it seems like they are milking this franchise hard, anyway I probably wont get it I didnt like 1 and didnt think much of 2 I must admit that the setting has me more interested than usual though so I will wait and see before making a final decision but it would have to be something pretty special before I invested my money in the series again.
Assassin's Creed is the perfect example of how adding features to a game can actually detract from the overall experience. While many of the games do have some pretty fun gameplay elements, they keep obscuring the assassinating in each consecutive game. 5$ says they reboot the series for the "5th" game, calling it Assassin's Creed: Random Subtitle and make it take place in medieval Europe and make every mission a stealth/assassination mission. Then the developer's can say something along the lines of "We were trying to bring the Assassin's Creed series back to the basics"

Honestly, I would get AC4 if it was a new IP or a different one. There's something about the white hood outfit that looks incredibly out of place in this time period.
 

King Aragorn

New member
Mar 15, 2013
368
0
0
fezgod said:
Maximum Bert said:
Wow it seems like they are milking this franchise hard, anyway I probably wont get it I didnt like 1 and didnt think much of 2 I must admit that the setting has me more interested than usual though so I will wait and see before making a final decision but it would have to be something pretty special before I invested my money in the series again.
Assassin's Creed is the perfect example of how adding features to a game can actually detract from the overall experience. While many of the games do have some pretty fun gameplay elements, they keep obscuring the assassinating in each consecutive game. 5$ says they reboot the series for the "5th" game, calling it Assassin's Creed: Random Subtitle and make it take place in medieval Europe and make every mission a stealth/assassination mission. Then the developer's can say something along the lines of "We were trying to bring the Assassin's Creed series back to the basics"

Honestly, I would get AC4 if it was a new IP or a different one. There's something about the white hood outfit that looks incredibly out of place in this time period.
That's actually the plan, or atleast analysts think so. They'll release a title or two, sort of serving as ''AC3.5, 3.7'', and even if they sugar coat it with numbers, it won't change anything, then reboot on the new gen, as a ''fresh start'' of sorts.
Honestly, AC1 was a gem, but a flawed one. It gave you freedom and tools, but didn't give you enough to utilize them on. Also, the mission structure was plain horrible. ACII fixed the mission structure but took away your freedom, AC:BH and R followed the same route, but IMO AC3 stroke the perfect balance. I want them to stick to that, just add more of it. As there were about 2 of 5 assassinations that gave you freedom.

Ubisoft won't move on until people stop buying the AC games. Which won't happen, people complain and ramble on about how horrible the latest installment is, and how milked the series has become, but they go on and buy the next installment, which is released on a yearly basis.
 

sextus the crazy

New member
Oct 15, 2011
2,348
0
0
I stopped caring about AssCreed after the second game. Just got kinda bored of it. Hope it's good, but won't buy it.
Not to mention, that ubisoft should slow down their releases.
 

Raikas

New member
Sep 4, 2012
640
0
0
I voted "meh".

I tried to make my way through the whole series earlier this year (got them all for very cheap during a Boxing Day sale) - I made it through 1, 2, Brotherhood and about half of Revelations before I got bored with the whole thing. They look good, and I really enjoyed the parts where it was a place I'm actually familiar with (I loved the climbing Galata tower bit in Revelations for that), but ultimately they're just not that interesting to me.

That said, if it's cheap enough at some point and I have nothing else to do, I might pick it up eventually.
 

Extra-Ordinary

Elite Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,065
0
41
sextus the crazy said:
Not to mention, that ubisoft should slow down their releases.
YES.
Granted, I'm too big an Assassin's Creed fan to NOT get this when it comes out but I agree completely.
Hey, ubi, I love your games but hey, slow them down, eh?
 

WoW Killer

New member
Mar 3, 2012
965
0
0
spartandude said:
Il do what ive done with the first 4 AC games so far, but them when they are about £20 on amazon, still waiting for number 3 to drop to that
It was £15 on Steam not long ago; that's the only reason I picked it up. And yeah, I'll probably do the same for this one. It doesn't interest me enough to pay full price, but if I can get it cheap I'll give it a look.

Sounds like they're on the right lines for this one though. New hero; cool, I didn't like Conner much. Naval focus; great, that was the only real stand out feature of 3.

Main thing I want to see is some better RPG elements. Ubisoft have this habit of doing the open world aspects pretty well but then giving no incentive for the player to use them. I didn't play Farcry 3, but I heard it was similar in that regard. In AC3 you had different weapons you could craft and buy, but when the weapons you were given for free were as much as you'd ever need, there was no point outside of aesthetics. I could only find one upgrade path that made a notable difference on the combat, and that was increasing the number of shots your pistols could fire before reloading (you can craft a belt that lets you hold two pistols, and then later you can craft a pistol that fires twice, so you eventually go up to four shots). Nothing else made a noticeable difference to me.

You look at that new Tomb Raider instead; the progression system was much more interesting. You could unlock all kinds of new moves to play around with in combat: little dodges, melee attacks, counters, throwing dirt in someones eyes. And then all your weapons had stuff like alternate fires, modes, scopes, silencers. That's how you do RPG elements. Shame it wasn't as open world as I was expecting.

So yeah, that's what I'd like to see. Give me different ships to buy and upgrade. Let me tweak the accuracy versus fire rate on my cannons. Let me choose which crewman goes where. So much potential. But I doubt that's the game we'll get.
 

Scrustle

New member
Apr 30, 2011
2,031
0
0
The concept sounds like it could be good, but I'm just tired with AC. I've not played AC3, and I've since lost what little motivation I had to do so. So AC4 just isn't happening.

I might have been a lot more interested in it if it actually wasn't an AC game. It reminds me a bit of that Pirates of the Caribbean game that got cancelled a while back. That looked really cool.