Poll: Assuming that you are alive 2 years after the Zombie Apocolypse or Nuclear Apocolypse or Both?

Recommended Videos

Cabboge

New member
Mar 29, 2009
83
0
0
Well i think that the zombie one would be a lot easier as you can naturally assume everyone is a zombie and shoot them and there isnt all that mucking about with radiation...
 

xxdomoxxkunxx

New member
Jul 2, 2009
87
0
0
but serisoly i would be good at both zombies np get guns find escape or hideout some where especialy the slow ones and with nukes stay away from big cities (NY,LA,etc) and you would be fine the problems with nukes are SMART ppl who use guns compared with idiotic zombies. nukes you can prepare shit if you didnt die by radiation or the nuke it self didnt kill you with zombies you are usually thrown out there with jackshit with zombies all around.
 

CNKFan

New member
Aug 20, 2008
1,034
0
0
Zombie, because I have seen all of George A. Romero's zombie films and I have a pretty good idea. First, start a settlement in/around a large shopping mall (ex.Mall of America). Second, implement a strict physical and psycological check of any and all people wanting to come in. The last thing I want is someone goning crazy or turning into a zombie in my settlement. Lastly, enjoy the end of the world.
 

Asymptote Angel

New member
Feb 6, 2008
594
0
0
I'd survive much better in a zombie apocalypse, but I don't see much point in living after I'm forced to dismember former loved ones, so I'd rather just die quickly and get it over with. I vote nuke-u-ler.
 

Chiddy

New member
Jun 18, 2009
322
0
0
zombies, no matter what your gonna die in the nuclear one, zombie one it would be heaps more fun even if you did die
 

NeutralDrow

New member
Mar 23, 2009
9,097
0
0
Nuclear. Fallout can be avoided, and radiation poisoning isn't communicable... except perhaps through reproduction, but even then, there's a good survival chance.
 

Neurowaste

New member
Apr 4, 2008
403
0
0
Scrythe said:
Zombies.

Me as well, have both of them 2 feet away from me, together we'll defeat the undead horde, gather every zombie-aware person in a fortified position and life in relative safety :)
 

Srkkl

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,152
0
0
I'd rather not have to survive either, but the zombies would be more fun.
 

C0nn0r666

New member
Oct 19, 2008
402
0
0
i do not want to deal with zombies cause thier going to get you no matter what your plan is
 

BakaSmurf

Elite Member
Dec 25, 2008
1,323
0
41
Zombie, I've read World War Z, High School of the Dead and played my fair share of zombie games, I'm more than ready.

But then again, I live in the middle of nowhere so my chances of being hit by a nuke or getting affected really badly by radiation are virtually null...

You know what? I'm on the fence. Zombie Apocolypse is more fun, but I have a better chance of surviving a Nuclear Apocolypse.

Ah screw it, both it is!
 

Shock and Awe

Winter is Coming
Sep 6, 2008
4,647
0
0
Zombie, I can fight and re-kill a zombie, but I cant fight a nuke, well you can, but I dont have the equipment.

Wardog's Guide To Surviving the Zombie Apocalypse!

1. Arm and Train Yourself, shotguns are not really to useful because you have to get so close to the zombie, use a semi Automatic rifle that is easy to clean and repair, and doesn't use ammunition that is to large, because you will need a lot of it, and a .50 cal round is unneeded weight.

2. Stock up on food, and water things like canned food and non-perishables like cereal and such are best.

3. Gather up a bunch of friends that know how to use guns well, bring men and women, you may need to re-populate the earth, make sure you bring plenty non-family members as well.

4. Bring all your food, guns and friends to a rural area where you can hold out.

5. Have Fun!
 

Flying-Emu

New member
Oct 30, 2008
5,367
0
0
PurpleRain said:
I think both will be caused by the jellyfish so in the end, no matter which was you'll look at it, we're all screwed by our jelly-like enemies.
Excuse me if I'm out of the loop, but what?!

Jellyfish are cute!
 

Zenode

New member
Jan 21, 2009
1,103
0
0
Nuclear Apocalypse, for one you simply stay away from the initial impact area's apart from that nothing bad would really happen.

Zombies just wouldnt stop coming so yeh im all for Nuclear Apocalypse.
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
ElephantGuts said:
Nukes, because trying to survive from an actual undead horde would scare the shit out of me.

Atleast radiation isn't scary. Plus it can't be everywhere, and doesn't spread from its original location (which would probably be cities that were nuked).
Other than the unpleasant fact that irradiated dust and water are perfectly capable of travel, I suppose it is rather stationary, assuming you can tell those pesky winds to stop blowing (all you have to do is put out the sun!)
 
Jan 23, 2009
2,334
0
41
BakaSmurf said:
Zombie, I've read World War Z, High School of the Dead and played my fair share of zombie games, I'm more than ready.
Nuclear Apocalypse is unrecoverable tbh w/out sci-fi stuff that doesnt exist (remember Fallout 3's universe was wreaked and they had 200years of tech adv. on us)... but Zombie Apocalypse can be recovered from with good old human common-sense, and some rational thought- as depicted in World War Z.