Poll: Bad Company 2's fourth multiplayer mode

[BigHandInSky]

Well i just got my subscription of Gamesmaster today [British Gaming mag] and in their 2010 games special talking about all/most of the games planned for 2010 they have a section which is on Bad Company 2 (not much just a paragraph) and in it it says [and i quote] :

"...Bad Company will also feature four multiplayer modes:Rush,Conquest,Squad Match and Squad Rush."

So what do you think? does it sound good? ideas on how it will work? etc. etc.

I'll add more poll options if needed

 

[God52495]

I think it's good their expanding a bit! BF: Bad Company was an undeniably good game that was constantly bad-mouthed by COD-obsessed people; maybe BF:BC2 will show people how fun a game is where you actually use tactics and its not alway WHIZ-BANG-BOOM action.

 

[Omikron009]

I'm looking forward to BC2 quite a bit. That is all.

 

[Ocelot GT]

how can I answer a poll about a gameplay mechanic when all I know is its name? :s

Anyways, I think most ppl will only wanna play or log the most time on the conquest mode. thats what BF has always been about.

 

[Worgen]

sounds pretty cool so far, cant wait

 

[jimduckie]

sry people bad co. was not my fav game and won't get bad co 2 ... i'm not a ea games fan , just don't like ea period

 

[MrSnugglesworth]

I've been thinking of getting this game.

Total Destructive environments is the only reason. After Battlefield 1943's shitty destructive environments, I am excited to see some good ones.


It'll probably be pretty generic in every other way, but eh.

 

[Mr.Governor]

sry people bad co. was not my fav game and won't get bad co 2 ... i'm not a ea games fan , just don't like ea period

Its not an ea game,its a DICE game goddammit

 

[MrSnugglesworth]

I've been thinking of getting this game.

Total Destructive environments is the only reason. After Battlefield 1943's shitty destructive environments, I am excited to see some good ones.


It'll probably be pretty generic in every other way, but eh.

If that's the only reason just go buy Red Faction Guerilla.

I meant online.


Like, so if someone camping in a building, I can go up behind and be like BOOM! EXPLOSION! THATS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CAMP!

 

[MrSnugglesworth]

I've been thinking of getting this game.

Total Destructive environments is the only reason. After Battlefield 1943's shitty destructive environments, I am excited to see some good ones.


It'll probably be pretty generic in every other way, but eh.

If that's the only reason just go buy Red Faction Guerilla.

I meant online.


Like, so if someone camping in a building, I can go up behind and be like BOOM! EXPLOSION! THATS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CAMP!

RFG also has online.

I'm not a fan of 3rd person games?

 

[Zenode]

My only concern (sort of) is what happens when you have an urban map, won't some idiots just run around C-4ing every building until it's just a plain flat map with rubble

 

[Rainboq]

All the modes in the world mean shit to me unless the gameplay is good. And sadly for BFBC2 it plays just like the first, which is a bad thing.

How is it a bad thing? I loved BF:BC and I found the gameplay to be great, sure the control scheme is different, but the game plays great!

 

[Epitome]

I just want MASSIVE maps I love Gold Rush in BF:BC, I have had sfa problems with campers because of the sheer size of the place its not hard to find a different los with a launcher and bye bye sniper