Poll: Bane: Good villain or bad villain?

Recommended Videos

Matthew Jabour

New member
Jan 13, 2012
1,063
0
0
Ah, Bane. How do I even begin to describe Bane? On the one hand, he had an iconic appearance, unforgettable speech pattern, and a number of instant meme one-liners. On the other hand, his motives were unclear, he didn't really have much of a personality, and he was ultimately sidelined by a character who somehow had even LESS personality. So, was he good or bad as a villain? I'll leave that to you to decide. As always, please justify your answer.
 
Dec 3, 2011
308
0
0
For me a good villain is intimidating and/or despicable. For me, Bane wasn't that. I thought he was just a bad Darth Vader rip-off; robotic voice, cool mask, messes up necks. I found his voice annoying, and he only spouted dull exposition. I... did not like him as a villain at all. He gets defeated just by being punched in the face, and then gets thrown aside by Catwoman. Meh.
 

Keoul

New member
Apr 4, 2010
1,579
0
0
As a standalone villain separate from the comics he is a good villain.
If not then I would say they portrayed him terribly, they removed core aspects of his back story and characteristics in that movie. I was extremely miffed when he was given a funny speech pattern, no venom, and that
a big chunk of HIS backstory was given to Talia and we never find out about his childhood.
But these gripes only exist if he is compared to the comic book version. If not then he is, as a whole, a good character and a great villain.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
Well, he spoke well. Um...that's about it.

I didn't particularly like TDKR. All three movies were a bit long and pretentious, but TDKR too it way too far.

A lot of the movie could have been trimmed, and that was particularly annoying because there wasn't enough Catwoman. Finally, Batman gets to interact with another costumed person that's sorta kinda on his side...which, IMHO, is the best thing about Batman. On his own he's not great, but with a masked partner or sidekick or ally (police aren't quite the same), he can work. And Catwoman doesn't really do much, giving the movie is close to 3 hours long.

Anyhoo, IMHO, Bane didn't work well because the movie didn't. I coudln't take the movie seriously, so I coudln't take him seriously. I think it would have been better to make it silly and campy, have cackling supervillains and get Catwoman making terrible, terrible cat related puns all the time. If you movie is going to be very silly, at least acknowledge it.
 

Kenbo Slice

Deep In The Willow
Jun 7, 2010
2,706
0
41
Gender
Male
He's a good villain in the comics, but in TDKR...not so much.

He would've been better this way:
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
Honestly, Bane is an awesome villain. The brute strength to overpower the bat but with the rarer combination of the intellect to outsmart him as well. The pencil necked geek doing impressions of SNLs impression of Sean Connery wearing a rubberized thong backwards is absolutely horrendous and guts the last film of the nolan era. While the narrative of the char in the film is not bad, its the atrocious presentation that makes Bane even worse than campy 60s era batman villains.

The saddest thing is, Nolan could have and SHOULD have replaced Bane with Hush and ditch the headgear and the stupid accent and it would have been quite solid.

Honestly Im glad Nolan is done. While you cant argue the good his films have done for the franchise if not for the viewers KNOWING that moving forward a new reboot would be required, it would be downright damaging, and I hate to think it might even wrongly color impressions of Bane in the future.


Sorry, Just a tad resentful after finally seeing the film recently and gravitating towards Bane as a char the moment I first encountered him.
 

Floppertje

New member
Nov 9, 2009
1,056
0
0
Kenbo Slice said:
He's a good villain in the comics, but in TDKR...not so much.

He would've been better this way:
that video makes me wonder... how does the guy even eat? isn't he in extreme pain when he takes off the mask?

I didn't like him much, the most interesting thing about him was his voicething, and that was kinda annoying. His methods were kinda weird too... he wants to give gotham back to the people by subjecting them to a terror regime? how does that make any sense??
 

capper42

New member
Nov 20, 2009
429
0
0
I liked him. He was a large, brutish beefcake, but with an air of dignity about him. He was fun to watch, and whether his plan made any sense, it was interesting to watch it unfold.
 

The Wykydtron

"Emotions are very important!"
Sep 23, 2010
5,458
0
0
Was he a good villian? Maybe... He was most definitely an enjoyable and entertaining villian though and that's what really counts.

He wasn't a bad villian by any means and he was threatening enough but again he is just fun to watch.

I guess a large part of whether you liked him or not comes down to what you make of his voice changer thingie, I thought it was fucking cool whereas other people think it was silly and out of place. Still Batman had a voice changer as well...

We need a thread about which voice changer is more retarded XD
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
19,347
4,013
118
He was an OK villain throughout the movie. Never mind his voice - I thought it sounded like a horrid dubbing job, granted, like I was watching an equally horrid dubbed version of the film - but I lived with it.

No, what ruined it for me was the finale. The final battle between Bats and Bane was terribly underwhelming, with Catwoman's casual intervention to boot. But what bothered me moreso was how they took away Bane's doctrine and masterminding and gave it to Talia. This turned Bane into little more than a thug - a very gracious, eloquent, genially-sounding thug, albeit a thug. We all loved Joker for being his irreverent own master and following his code alone, and now we get a glorified thug to take his stead.

He's not just a thug taking orders. Bane is a soldier to Talia (with whom nobody is very impressed or frightened, I imagine)... Talia is a soldier to Ra's. Who is dead. So the big baddie turns out to be the thug of another thug to a dead guy whom we stopped caring for movie #1. I was distinctly underwhelmed by all of these revelations and felt they took away whatever splendor Bane could've taken for himself.
 

Vegan_Doodler

New member
May 29, 2011
201
0
0
I'd say yes, right up until the last part of the film where everything is handed over to Talia.

I found him a joy to watch, his physical presence and subsequent dominance and intimidation of everyone around him was incredible. I also think that he was portrayed well as a mirror image of batman (as all good bat villains are), being just as if not more strong and intelligent as the bat himself.

I also really liked his philosophy of the lower classes overthrowing the upper classes, something that Nolan has done consistently well, explaining the villains motives to the point where you may not agree with them but you can certainly understand them, and that is truly terrifying.

Like I said, I enjoyed him right up until the point where it was climatically reviled that everything he said was bollocks and he had taken Gotham the same way the corrupt had, by blatantly lying. Come on, the Joker had a thew drums of gasoline and a couple of bullets, while bane has an entire army and the most impressive take over this genius can come up with is to lie?

I can understand the practicality and effectiveness of just lying but it just doesn't seem as impressive as what came before. I think his character would have worked a lot better if it was reviled at the end that Bane actually did believe everything he said and was only working with Talia so that he could get close to Wayne and thus brake the Batman, who's very existence he would see as a symbol of the injustice of his own existence.

Having said all that I did really enjoy Bane and he remains one of my favorite cinematic characters of 2012.
 

Olas

Hello!
Dec 24, 2011
3,226
0
0
He was a good villain up until the Talia revelation I'd say. Up until that point he was interesting and witty while also being intimidating which I think qualifies him as a good villain.
 

Ilikemilkshake

New member
Jun 7, 2010
1,977
0
0
Trying to figure him out was the only thing that made the film interesting. Once the reveal finally came it was a bit of a let down.

So while interesting, ultimately he was a pretty poor villain.