Poll: Being 'Whipped.'

Recommended Videos

zidine100

New member
Mar 19, 2009
1,016
0
0
oh i thought we were talking about whips, well colour me disappointed.

on a side note im not whipped for i am foreverAlone.jpg. With jokes like this i cant imagine why.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Raven said:
People who are whipped generally just make me laugh.

When my best mate was so whipped that he refused to come out for a pint because he wanted to stay at home and sit by the phone just incase his romantic interest (not gf) had a bad day and needed emotional support, i had to drive over to his house, slap him and shout MAN THE FUCK UP!!!

He never saw the errors of his ways...
Sit by the phone? When was this, 1876?

Stasisesque said:
Reading the rest of your posts, it seems I don't know what being whipped means.

I thought it meant being able to get your SO to do things for you, that you were completely capable of doing yourself, but for one reason or another, didn't. Apparently it means not being able to spend any time apart?

If the latter is the case, then I'll have to revise my previous post. Neither of us are whipped.
It includes both, as far as I'm concerned.

OT: When you're whipped you don't really give a shit but everything'll be worse when it all ends in tears.
 

Guffe

New member
Jul 12, 2009
5,106
0
0
I'm not, never been and never have whipped anyone.
I couldn't really care less if someone is whipped or not but it's occassionally funny to make a little fun of the friends who are.
 

Stasisesque

New member
Nov 25, 2008
983
0
0
Woodsey said:
Stasisesque said:
Reading the rest of your posts, it seems I don't know what being whipped means.

I thought it meant being able to get your SO to do things for you, that you were completely capable of doing yourself, but for one reason or another, didn't. Apparently it means not being able to spend any time apart?

If the latter is the case, then I'll have to revise my previous post. Neither of us are whipped.
It includes both, as far as I'm concerned.
If it includes both, then what is happening here? We're... half whipped? Are myself and my boyfriend... are we... are we cropped?
 

Adeptus Aspartem

New member
Jul 25, 2011
843
0
0
I don't think one partner being whipped is healthy for the realtionship in the long term.
If you're not on equal grounds it probably wont work out.
 

Nantucket_v1legacy

acting on my best behaviour
Mar 6, 2012
1,064
0
0


Say whaaat?
It's not about being 'whipped'. If you were being truly whipped and realised it then I am quite surprised how cool you are with it.

I've always been more - You want to do that? Fine. I'll see you tomorrow. I've always felt whipping your man is because you don't trust them enough to be free to make their own decisions.
 

Brutal Peanut

This is so freakin aweso-BLARGH!
Oct 15, 2010
1,770
0
0
I thought this was going to be about sexy times.

Anyway, I'd say my Husband and I are equal. He'll ask if I'd like to go places with him, but I am generally okay with doing things by myself and him doing things by himself or with friends. We understand what alone time really means. Though we are best friends and spend a lot of time together anyway, and his friends have become my acquaintances and we get along well enough. Though I do like to know where he is going if I don't tag along. Not to keep tabs on him as if I don't trust him, but just in case of emergency. I mean what if something happens and the police ask, "Where was he going when he left the house?" and all I can say is, "Uh...somewhere that's not here?"
 

Flames66

New member
Aug 22, 2009
2,311
0
0
I think, in the right context, being whipped could be a sensual and pleasurable experience. It is commonly used as a form of torture though so I don't think it can be generalised as a single entity. What kind of whipping are you talking about here?


 

Username Redacted

New member
Dec 29, 2010
709
0
0
I have two thoughts on this:

1) For me it's really awkward being around a couple where one of the partners seems to have checked their backbone at the door.

2) I believe that there are gradients in relationships regarding a sort of "balance of power". I don't think a 50/50 relationship works because there ends up being too much deferring between the partners. IMO the ideal range for healthy "normal" relationships would be 55/45 to 65/35. You start seeing Dom/Sub relationships in the 70/30 to 80/20 range. Again IMO but anything over 85/15 would probably constitute an abusive relationship. Also: Hooray for oversimplification!
 

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
Between our friends we all joke about it, but except for one couple I don't think there's much whipping going on (usually both parts of each couple want to do the same thing anyway). I wouldn't say I'm whipped at all, my and my girlfriend are quite honest with eachother when we don't want to do stuff, but we're nice to eachother anyway (I'd have thought that was expected in a relationship after all).
 

WolfThomas

Man must have a code.
Dec 21, 2007
5,292
0
0
Being whipped is most enjoyable, restrained and blindfolded as your girlfriend teasingly draws the whip across you body before...

...Oh different whipped.

I don't know I think my relationship works on two rivers logic (from the Wheel of Time). Where I let her make all the small decisions so I can put my foot down on something important and usually get my way. The inverse it could be interpreted that she lets me have a victory here or there so can control the day to day stuff.
 

Legion

Were it so easy
Oct 2, 2008
7,190
0
0
I have little respect for people like that unless it genuinely makes them happy. Too often you find one partner completely under their partners thumb and they are miserable, but too weak to stand up for themselves.

This can happen in all kind of relationships, but in my experience it's normally the guys who are 'whipped', I normally assume it's due to fear of not getting sex, or fear of not being in a relationship.

Why anybody would want to be in a relationship where they are treated like a servant, I do not know, but like I said, if they actually enjoy it, then I have no right to criticise.
 

DoomyMcDoom

New member
Jul 4, 2008
1,411
0
0
I tend to avoid the whipped sort of relationships, on either side of it, for one, I'm not somoene who is whippable, I do my thing, if someone has a problem with that then I don't need them in my life, however if it's someone who wants me to give them instruction on how to spend all their time or live their life, then I find the relationship irritating, I like women who can be happy being them, and can be happy with me being me, because I can be happy without that kind of relationship as well, if someone wants to spend time with me, and I want to spend time with them and share life in a relationship of that variety, that is good, because it make certain parts of life more enjoyable due to the mutual enjoyment reinforcing personal enjoyment, thing, that happens...

Every guy I've known personally, as a friend IRL, who's been "whipped" has had those relationships end badly, usually because the woman gets bored being in control, and starts cheating on him with someone else who is less boring, controllable, or predictable, but hey, to each their own I guess.
 

The Funslinger

Corporate Splooge
Sep 12, 2010
6,150
0
0
Raven said:
People who are whipped generally just make me laugh.

When my best mate was so whipped that he refused to come out for a pint because he wanted to stay at home and sit by the phone just incase his romantic interest (not gf) had a bad day and needed emotional support, i had to drive over to his house, slap him and shout MAN THE FUCK UP!!!

He never saw the errors of his ways...
Oh God. He doesn't even have the excuse of being a slave to the vajayjayjay[small]jayjayjayjay...[/small]

[small]jay...[/small]

I'm sorry, what were we talking about?

OT: Well, if the person I was whipped to in this hypothetical scenario was on my back to a bad extent, that situation wouldn't have happened. I do not respond well to being controlled.

Assuming this isn't the case, I never really give a shit about being whipped. Likely because I grew up with dogs and am therefore content to settle for a pleasant dog's life with a girl I love. If that metaphor makes sense.

That said, I don't think me being whipped has the typical result, as I've been 'whipped' before, and I still had my uh... energetic eccentricity that unnerves everyone around me. Even the girl who was supposed to be the boss in this couple :p

She was totally wrong when she said I couldn't design a technically safe flaming sombrero.
 

Adam Jensen_v1legacy

I never asked for this
Sep 8, 2011
6,651
0
0
Those kinds of relationships never work. Girls don't like guys who put them on a pedestal and let them do whatever they want with them. They lose interest fast. They want someone who is their equal. And if they're not the ones to lose interest, then guys lose interest. And when that happens, the girl goes berserk because she can no longer control the guy.

How long have you been in a relationship with your current girlfriend? Perhaps you're not yet out of the infatuation stage. Which is nice, I suppose. It's a good feeling being completely obsessed with each other. But once that wears off, and it always does, two things can happen. You realize that you're not actually in love, which can be depressing, or your love matures and you bond even more. If that happens, and I hope it does, it's the best thing in the world.
 

Kargathia

New member
Jul 16, 2009
1,657
0
0
ms_sunlight said:
I've been with the same guy for a very long time. There are abusive relationships and there are consensual relationships, and both of these take many forms. In any event, the idea of calling someone "whipped" seems absurd and childish.
Eh, I'm going to second that - especially as it's pretty clear by now that I prefer women independent enough to offset my own dominant habits.

Captcha: "How quaint". My thoughts exactly.
 

Winthrop

New member
Apr 7, 2010
325
0
0
Stasisesque said:
Reading the rest of your posts, it seems I don't know what being whipped means.

I thought it meant being able to get your SO to do things for you, that you were completely capable of doing yourself, but for one reason or another, didn't. Apparently it means not being able to spend any time apart?

If the latter is the case, then I'll have to revise my previous post. Neither of us are whipped.
Thought the same thing as you. I'm fairly certian that we are correct as whipping in a literal sense is beating someone into submission. But whatever. I tend to do what ever my girlfriend asks me to, but I also do that for just about everyone.

EDIT: Not that I'm a pushover. I have limits and all. If something isn't inconvenient for me to do and someone needs it done I'll do it.