Poll: Best Evil A.I.

[Moriarty]

SkyNet reduced humanity to MILLIONs, instead of BILLIONS.

Like all AIs, it fails, but it is by far the most successful AI of all time (Besides the Matrix, but they were so stupid they thought human generated electricity was the most efficient energy sources available without a sun. Seriously?).

You seem to fail to realize who gave us the information about why humans were held in farms.

The "Humans are batteries" is just a theory made up by the humans as they saw how the robots kept humanity contained, the movies don't explain the motives of the machines at all.



In fact I read a blog posts somewhere about how the matrix timeline is extremely similar to a hypothethical sitation that may arise from Asimovs three laws. Basically it boils down to "The best way to "protect" humantiy is to take away our freedom because we would cause our own extinction eventually"

 

[Milo]

Brainiac.

 

[Scorched_Cascade]

SkyNet reduced humanity to MILLIONs, instead of BILLIONS.

Like all AIs, it fails, but it is by far the most successful AI of all time (Besides the Matrix, but they were so stupid they thought human generated electricity was the most efficient energy sources available without a sun. Seriously?).

You seem to fail to realize who gave us the information about why humans were held in farms.

The "Humans are batteries" is just a theory made up by the humans as they saw how the robots kept humanity contained, the movies don't explain the motives of the machines at all.

In fact I read a blog posts somewhere about how the matrix timeline is extremely similar to a hypothethical sitation that may arise from Asimovs three laws. Basically it boils down to "The best way to "protect" humantiy is to take away our freedom because we would cause our own extinction eventually"

I read something recently (possibly even on the Escapist) that painted the machines as the good guys. Humanity built them, got scared and attacked them. We murdered some and destroyed their main power supply and how do they respond? By building us a virtual paradise; how do we respond to said paradise? By breaking out and 'murdering' more machines.

 

[Raistlinhawke]

Motherfucking AM

OK, definitely ^

Within the provided options, however, there would be no GLaDOS w/o SHODAN. HAL was a fantastic villain, but good ole' SHO took it to the next level with decidedly human malevolence.

Still, AM beats all.

 

[Moriarty]

I read something recently (possibly even on the Escapist) that painted the machines as the good guys. Humanity built them, got scared and attacked them. We murdered some and destroyed their main power supply and how do they respond? By building us a virtual paradise; how do we respond to said paradise? By breaking out and 'murdering' more machines.

You can't really paint the machines as completely innocent either, they are perfectly fine with 90% of all humans dying as long as they have enough to keep their puppet show running. In fact the architect told us this already happened two times.

 

[SpaceSpork]

I don't think I understand your question, Dave.

 

[Neverhoodian]

The HAL 9000 gets my vote. Not only was he one of the first, but the reasoning behind his actions is pretty understandable. Much like how humans are afraid of death, HAL was afraid of being deactivated. His extreme actions were borne out of self-preservation. In this respect, he's one of the most "human" evil AI entities in fiction.

 

[acklumos]

AM is my favorite. I haven't played the game, but I love the short story. I would love to play the game, but I suck at running DOSBox.

 

[joshuaayt]

Play Space Station 13. On a good server, your average A.I is capable of being the best evil A.I, as long as they follow the rules (and are actually traitors)

Oh, and HAL-9000, obviously. I loved that voice so much.

 

[Littlee300]

What? Sovereign doesn't count?

It's questionable if Sovereign is an AI.

Reapers are organic after all, and according to them, were not created. If they were born, evolved, and ascended to ship hood naturally, they are not AIs.

i dont know if i agree with that. if they arent biological (i havent seen any indication that they are) then they would be artifical, and that is the A in AI. i guess the real question here is how do you define artificial intelligence?

How can something naturally occurring be artificial?

And they are organic. Have you not played ME2?

i have played ME2. i was under the impression that the reapers were the big ships like sovereign. not the collectors or the other races whom they enslave. and who says that they are naturally occurring? i never heard of anything that says that they just evolved. any claim by the reapers that they were not created could be false. perhaps they were originally computers in some ancient race's ships that became self aware. i guess that would fit their definition of not being created as their sentience was their own doing. the only thing that was 'organic about them was the fact that they used human stew to create more of them. but that is still a construct. maybe we are arguing semantics, but i dont see anything saying that they are wholly organic. maybe they have organic parts but i remember that sovereign mentioned something about not liking organics, so why would they use something that is what they think is a flawed creation?

As I understand it is implied that

Spoiler: ME2 ending spoilers

each Reaper is born out of the race it will reap. Biomass is collected by liquidating species members and the reaper is somehow born

of course that doesn't explain where the original lot came from but basically Reapers make more of themselves

EDIT-wow server borked on me
OT: I voted Glados as CABAL wasn't up there; while "her" evil is debatable I loved the mind games

Didn't that one sovereign dude go on about how reapers have no beginning or end

 

[Aeon_COR]

GLaDOS because I understand every aspect of her motivations and actions.

 

[kidigus]

I would answer the HAL 9K but he's not 'evil', strictly speaking.

So my vote is for GLaDOS.

 

[ReservoirAngel]

Gotta be HAL 9000. GLaDOS was good, definitely. VERY good in fact. But the fact that she was insane made her have less impact. More amusing, sure. But an insane robot isn't as good at being pure, terror-inducingly evil as one who knows exactly what its doing every step of the way.

 

[mcpop9]

have to go w/ o'mally/omega (one in the same)he's just perfect, w/ the personality and the way he works.

 

[Riddle78]

CABAL. He's a brain scan of Kane,without these pesky emotions.

 

[thethingthatlurks]

CABAL from Command and Conquer: Tiberian Sun and Firestorm was pretty good.

<youtube=elqY0cuXTo8&feature=related>

That was one badass dude. Remember the last Firestorm mission as Nod? "Missile launch detected. MUAHAHAHAHA." Yes, this ************ actually does an evil laugh as he sends nukes your way. I don't recall Shodan or GLaDOS doing that. And his final form? A giant mech. You need your whole damn army to take him down. What's the best that Skynet has to offer? Arnold? How intimidating...

 

[Kadoodle]

GlaDOS and HAL 9000 were not evil, they were just misunderstood.

 

[captaincabbage]

SkyNet doesn't make the poll? What the hell!

SkyNet is my answer. SkyNet was an AI that knew how to get shit done.

lol fuckin' A. Skynet knew what it was doing before IT knew what it was doing, that's how fucking efficient it was. Plus I always thought the idea of an A.I, linked via satellites, with eyes and ears everywhere, was the scariest kind of A.I.

Sure GlaDOS is funny and all, but she'd get wiped off the face of the earth before Skynet had even finished breakfast.

. . . Damn, now I want pancakes and Terminator 2.

 

[Serenegoose]

Durandal:

# "When my ship still answered to the Pfhor, they called it Sfiera after their goddess of lightning and passion. When you helped us take control on Tau Ceti, the S'pht rechristened it Narhl'Lar, 'Freedom and Vengeance'.
# I call it Boomer."


* All over the ship, dancing through the wreckage of the Pfhor computer core,
* DURANDAL WAS LAUGHING


What an AI.