The schools I went to never had sex ed.
I have nothing further to contribute to this discussion.
I have nothing further to contribute to this discussion.
The biggest thing wrong is the only part. That system offers little to no accurate information on masturbation, safe sex, contraceptives, and a couple other things, opting to say nothing to help guide and protect the teens that go ahead anyway (because, you know, teenagers can be very rebellious and horny, so it's bound to happen no matter what they're told). Don't get me wrong, abstinence is the only 100% effective way to prevent infections and pregnancies when properly used, and comprehensive sex-ed does cover this, but it would be a cold day in hell if every non-married couples stopped having sex because they were told to. So until that happens, people will constantly have sex, so it would be best for them to have the proper knowledge and how best to protect themselves doing it.Xan Krieger said:I graduated in 2008 and I don't even remember sex-ed. I'm not even sure if my school had one.
Also what's wrong with abstinence only? Is it because kids are too stupid that when they hear "Don't have sex" they hear "Lil'Wayne is awesome!"?
Or, and I know this is crazy, they could have LISTENED AND NOT DONE ANYTHING! I mean, its not out of the question, considering the whole "can not control it" thing is a myth. Most teens are smart enough to control what they do and not let thier hormones rule them, and its a small minority that cant.....or at least, thats what it seems to be in the Midwest. (maybe the whole "Shotgun cleaning" practice helps.)CrossLOPER said:I'm pretty sure it was because the students were mostly dorks, or smart enough to figure out how to use a little piece of latex.
Which doesn't work. Tell most teenagers they can't have sex, most teenagers will turn round and say 'fuck right off'.Zaik said:The honest reason abstinence-only sex ed has survived as long as it has is to reduce the number of children that end up in the adoption system due to teen pregnancies.
Yes he should. I went to a catholic school. They teach us what sex is, that abortion is bad, that STI's are bad, and that we shouldn't have sex until marriage.Zaik said:Why does religion always come up in these? You want to talk about misinformation, you shouldn't spread it!
The trouble is, the numbers tend to show that abstinence-only sex ed doesn't reduce teen pregnancies.Zaik said:The honest reason abstinence-only sex ed has survived as long as it has is to reduce the number of children that end up in the adoption system due to teen pregnancies.
The first time Junior meets the father of the girl he is dating, Daddy will be sitting in his big chair, box of shotgun ammo next to him, cleaning a 12-guage, then look junior in the eye, and say "Nothing is going to happen with you and my daughter, RIGHT???!" I DARE you to try ANYTHING on her knowing that daddy is armed, and very protective. (Ah, the memories. Her dad trust me now, though.)CrossLOPER said:I have no idea what "shotgun cleaning" is.
Well, going by what my school was, we were all the kids of farmers, soldiers, and blue-collar workers. Considering I was really popular with girls (I knew just about all of them), I can say with 85% certainty that most of them did not have sex during the year. Because most of them were smart enought to know that it was better to wait, because again, out of my class, only 2 girls got pregnant (and only one was on accidentThe thing is, most of the people in my school came from upper middle class families. Usually, this demographic has plans for college and a healthy concept of consequences. I doubt the abstinence program helped. There was plenty of fucking going on and it was not that difficult to find ass.
Guess we'll never know.