You say immature like it's a bad thing. Life's too long to be middle-aged at 18.Trivun said:I seem to be the only person left with any sort of common sense. That rule is stupid and not a real rule. It's one of the most immature things I've ever had the misfortune to know of, and anyone subscribing to such a policy as a life rule is in dire need of mental adjustment to make them more sensible and mature.
Note that this refers only to my opinion on the 'rule', not on the thread itself. Rather, in the context of the OP, I'd go for 'hoes', of course. Because only a complete ass would ignore his girlfriend for the sake of hanging out with his friends, who he can easily hang out with any other time. Unless, of course, he wants to be single again fairly soon...
As regards to the rule there is an element of truth in it. It's not always or even mostly bros before hos but the opposite isn't true either. Especially since it's a girlfriend in this situation, someone the hypothetical man has already slept with/is going to keep sleeping with, the hanging out with bros being something that you can do anytime similarly applies to shagging the missus. I'm assuming neither one is an especially rare occasion although if one is then that should probably take precedence. Case-by-case basis really.
This situation boils down to "interupt having a good time with party A and B to have a good time with only party B". To me, that's just seems rude.