Sparrow Tag said:Because we're such nice blokes, America would be like "Amgz, we like dem Brits. Dis' ain't hapnin'".
Also, our Navy would bollock your face off if you tried anything from the sea. Our airforce is good as well. However, our army isn't much so we might be screwed there. We're really the back-up guys when it comes to wars now.
Thanatos34 said:Russia is quite a bit more powerful, and more of a threat, than most people give them credit for. (This is based mostly on my dad's opinion, who is an ex-submarine commander.)Krall said:The USA? Yes. Russia? Doubtful. China? No.Thanatos34 said:On topic: Of course it could be invaded and conquered. The US could do it, Russia could do it, possibly China.
China couldn't actually get to the British Isles, as it doesn't have a blue water fleet.
I doubt Russia is advanced enough and has the resources to establish air superiority over the British Isles and to decisively defeat the Royal Navy, so any landing they attempt would be likely to fail.
EMFCRACKSHOT said:Anyone could be invaded, but we all know that any full scale war in the future will be nuclear. Our submarine based nuclear detterant is capable of destroying any location we choose on this planet, and America, if you launched on us, we could have the entire eastern seaboard wiped from existence within three minutes and still have time for that last cup of tea before we all died. We also have the best trained troops in the world and some of the best equipped. And the SAS, who could forget those guys. Go England.
I'd still rather be English though. I don't like Americans.keyton777 said:Sparrow Tag said:Because we're such nice blokes, America would be like "Amgz, we like dem Brits. Dis' ain't hapnin'".
Also, our Navy would bollock your face off if you tried anything from the sea. Our airforce is good as well. However, our army isn't much so we might be screwed there. We're really the back-up guys when it comes to wars now.
.....you navy isnt the best, your airforce couldnt beat israels in a fair fight, much less the Us air forces, and your ground forces have to cross the english channel, we would just launch cruise missles at you in droves.
nothing is uninvadeable, nothing is invicible, nothing can last forever (save a diamond...i think)
You...you don't? Not even me?Sparrow Tag said:I'd still rather be English though. I don't like Americans.keyton777 said:Sparrow Tag said:Because we're such nice blokes, America would be like "Amgz, we like dem Brits. Dis' ain't hapnin'".
Also, our Navy would bollock your face off if you tried anything from the sea. Our airforce is good as well. However, our army isn't much so we might be screwed there. We're really the back-up guys when it comes to wars now.
.....you navy isnt the best, your airforce couldnt beat israels in a fair fight, much less the Us air forces, and your ground forces have to cross the english channel, we would just launch cruise missles at you in droves.
nothing is uninvadeable, nothing is invicible, nothing can last forever (save a diamond...i think)
I'm not certain if they could take America... I think it would result in mutual destruction.keyton777 said:Thanatos34 said:Russia is quite a bit more powerful, and more of a threat, than most people give them credit for. (This is based mostly on my dad's opinion, who is an ex-submarine commander.)Krall said:The USA? Yes. Russia? Doubtful. China? No.Thanatos34 said:On topic: Of course it could be invaded and conquered. The US could do it, Russia could do it, possibly China.
China couldn't actually get to the British Isles, as it doesn't have a blue water fleet.
I doubt Russia is advanced enough and has the resources to establish air superiority over the British Isles and to decisively defeat the Royal Navy, so any landing they attempt would be likely to fail.
russia, if they could fix their government, would be able to take america in a fair fight, they can do it now, saying they couldn't wipe britain off the face of the earth without nukes is just...well...naive. and china is the same way with shear man power, they dont need boats, they just need to get to teh english channel and mob you with landing vehicles
and someoen earlier back said that speed wasnt a factor, you my friend are an IDIOT
and natural fortifications can always be either removed, or built over.
Sparrow Tag said:I'd still rather be English though. I don't like Americans.keyton777 said:Sparrow Tag said:Because we're such nice blokes, America would be like "Amgz, we like dem Brits. Dis' ain't hapnin'".
Also, our Navy would bollock your face off if you tried anything from the sea. Our airforce is good as well. However, our army isn't much so we might be screwed there. We're really the back-up guys when it comes to wars now.
.....you navy isnt the best, your airforce couldnt beat israels in a fair fight, much less the Us air forces, and your ground forces have to cross the english channel, we would just launch cruise missles at you in droves.
nothing is uninvadeable, nothing is invicible, nothing can last forever (save a diamond...i think)
with or without nukes?Thanatos34 said:I'm not certain if they could take America... I think it would result in mutual destruction.keyton777 said:Thanatos34 said:Russia is quite a bit more powerful, and more of a threat, than most people give them credit for. (This is based mostly on my dad's opinion, who is an ex-submarine commander.)Krall said:The USA? Yes. Russia? Doubtful. China? No.Thanatos34 said:On topic: Of course it could be invaded and conquered. The US could do it, Russia could do it, possibly China.
China couldn't actually get to the British Isles, as it doesn't have a blue water fleet.
I doubt Russia is advanced enough and has the resources to establish air superiority over the British Isles and to decisively defeat the Royal Navy, so any landing they attempt would be likely to fail.
russia, if they could fix their government, would be able to take america in a fair fight, they can do it now, saying they couldn't wipe britain off the face of the earth without nukes is just...well...naive. and china is the same way with shear man power, they dont need boats, they just need to get to teh english channel and mob you with landing vehicles
and someoen earlier back said that speed wasnt a factor, you my friend are an IDIOT
and natural fortifications can always be either removed, or built over.
No need to get defensive, I don't mean it in a malicious way. As with most things, there are exceptions, but it's more personal experience than anything.keyton777 said:Sparrow Tag said:I'd still rather be English though. I don't like Americans.keyton777 said:Sparrow Tag said:Because we're such nice blokes, America would be like "Amgz, we like dem Brits. Dis' ain't hapnin'".
Also, our Navy would bollock your face off if you tried anything from the sea. Our airforce is good as well. However, our army isn't much so we might be screwed there. We're really the back-up guys when it comes to wars now.
.....you navy isnt the best, your airforce couldnt beat israels in a fair fight, much less the Us air forces, and your ground forces have to cross the english channel, we would just launch cruise missles at you in droves.
nothing is uninvadeable, nothing is invicible, nothing can last forever (save a diamond...i think)
then thats your problem for having an issue with us, not all americans are what you picture us as in your head.
Thankyou for correcting me. Now I can tell Americans, 'My country kicked your arse!'Thanatos34 said:Err, I think you got your facts mixed up there. It was the British that burned down the White House in the War of 1812.Zombie Badger said:The only uninvadeable countries are Russia and Canada. Napoleon and Hitler got the shit kicked out of them trying to invade Russia, and when the US attacked Canada in the War of 1812, they lost and the Canadians burned down the White House.
Also another great example.Zephirius said:You forgot Greenland. It's 836,000 sq mi of ice and snow. I doubt anyone even wants to invade that.
Sparrow Tag said:No need to get defensive, I don't mean it in a malicious way. As with most things, there are exceptions, but it's more personal experience than anything.keyton777 said:Sparrow Tag said:I'd still rather be English though. I don't like Americans.keyton777 said:Sparrow Tag said:Because we're such nice blokes, America would be like "Amgz, we like dem Brits. Dis' ain't hapnin'".
Also, our Navy would bollock your face off if you tried anything from the sea. Our airforce is good as well. However, our army isn't much so we might be screwed there. We're really the back-up guys when it comes to wars now.
.....you navy isnt the best, your airforce couldnt beat israels in a fair fight, much less the Us air forces, and your ground forces have to cross the english channel, we would just launch cruise missles at you in droves.
nothing is uninvadeable, nothing is invicible, nothing can last forever (save a diamond...i think)
then thats your problem for having an issue with us, not all americans are what you picture us as in your head.
That is like saying you beat an infant at running.Zombie Badger said:Thankyou for correcting me. Now I can tell Americans, 'My country kicked your arse!'Thanatos34 said:Err, I think you got your facts mixed up there. It was the British that burned down the White House in the War of 1812.Zombie Badger said:The only uninvadeable countries are Russia and Canada. Napoleon and Hitler got the shit kicked out of them trying to invade Russia, and when the US attacked Canada in the War of 1812, they lost and the Canadians burned down the White House.