What kind of question is this? EVERYTHING is a opinion, and every opinion is just as good as any other. No exceptions.
It depends if the opinion is a premise or a conclusion. If the opinion is used as a premise up which a conclusion rests, it is debatable but probably always right, as opinions are entirely subjective. If the opinion is a conclusion, it can easily be classed as invalid or valid depending on the credibility and validity of the premises, assuming they are not also opinions.Woodsey said:EDIT: This has come up quite a few times now, and I think that a far better word to use is "invalid" as opposed to "wrong".
Is valid, because the starting premise is an opinion which leads to another, equally valid opinion.I dislike any film featuring Leonardo Di Caprio
Leonardo Di Caprio is in Inception
So, I do not like Inception.
Is invalid, because the conclusion is an opinion which the premises do not support. Hence, contradicting evidence can render an opinion invalid.It's been shown that the majority of terrorist attacks outside the middle east are not committed by Muslims.
It is logically impossible for all Muslims to be extremists.
I still think that all Muslims should be deported because they are all terrorists and extremists.
There's a difference between fact and opinion.Woodsey said:This is something I often think about - especially when I'm on these forums - as it often results in debates becoming arguments. And I'm guessing that most people's gut reaction to the question will be, "no, of course they can't."
"Well that's just my opinion," seems to have become a get-out-of-jail-free-card for anyone from racists to the mythical beings that say they don't like Mafia (it's OK my friends, they're not real). In some cases that's a perfectly valid response when talking about an opinion on something subjective (a film/game/book, etc.) but in other instances that doesn't work.
If I said I hate Australia because they invaded China, then my opinion is wrong; that never happened (at least, I don't think it did...) and so my opinion is based on a false fact which in turn makes my opinion wrong.
So to me, an opinion can easily be wrong - of course, that's just my opinion.
Does anyone agree or disagree?
EDIT: This has come up quite a few times now, and I think that a far better word to use is "invalid" as opposed to "wrong".
This thread is 13 months old. Also: the point was that your opinion is invalid if you base it upon a false "fact".korgilee said:There's a difference between fact and opinion.Woodsey said:This is something I often think about - especially when I'm on these forums - as it often results in debates becoming arguments. And I'm guessing that most people's gut reaction to the question will be, "no, of course they can't."
"Well that's just my opinion," seems to have become a get-out-of-jail-free-card for anyone from racists to the mythical beings that say they don't like Mafia (it's OK my friends, they're not real). In some cases that's a perfectly valid response when talking about an opinion on something subjective (a film/game/book, etc.) but in other instances that doesn't work.
If I said I hate Australia because they invaded China, then my opinion is wrong; that never happened (at least, I don't think it did...) and so my opinion is based on a false fact which in turn makes my opinion wrong.
So to me, an opinion can easily be wrong - of course, that's just my opinion.
Does anyone agree or disagree?
EDIT: This has come up quite a few times now, and I think that a far better word to use is "invalid" as opposed to "wrong".
Facts are statement that can be proven and opinions are ones that cannot be proven by scientifically, statiscially, etc. means. They're based on someone's thoughts, their feelings, and their understanding.
Stating "I hate Australia" is an opinion.
Stating that they invaded China is contradicting a given fact.
Anyone who says the sky is red is just dumb.
Y'know, it's OK to start a new thread if it's been 2 years.Aaron George said:An opinion is a statement that has insufficient evidence known to the person stating it to qualify a true or false statement. That does not mean that the evidence does not exist. It only means the person stating the opinion does not know of that evidence. A person can state an opinion to another person and have that other person demonstrate by way of the evidence they know that the opinion is either true or false.