So how do you feel about:DragonLord Seth said:Well I agree with him, because there's a reason you need a man and a woman to make a baby. Then also the "straight couples are better because they can actually procreate" argument I've tried using before, but people were too stupid to understand it.
Wow...welcome to REPORTED, population YOU!DragonLord Seth said:Wow, not only did you completely misunderstand my point, but you also got pissed off! Just like last time I tried using this argument!Dragonclaw said:So how do you feel about:DragonLord Seth said:Well I agree with him, because there's a reason you need a man and a woman to make a baby. Then also the "straight couples are better because they can actually procreate" argument I've tried using before, but people were too stupid to understand it.
Couples who have no desire for kids...
Couples where one is infertile...
Couples who got married much later in life where having kids would likely result in birth defects...
Should they also not be able to marry? (My own marriage falls into at least one of these examples...it doesn't really matter which one...
Rather than calling people stupid because your basis for why straight marriages are "better" is a rather weak one all things considered, maybe realize that your procreation argument is rather poorly thought out...there's a LOT more to marriage than kids or the ability to have them.
Did I mention your examples? No. So shut the fuck up. I was making a general statement about what a straight marriage can do, as opposed to a homofaggotual one. Why should your examples be excluded from marriage? Did I say that marriage MUST equal a kid? No. So fuck off and read a post before getting flustered.
Because it's people like him that cause the laws such as the recent BS in north carolina.SmashLovesTitanQuest said:Who gives a fuck. If his chicken tastes good (which it doesn't, because it's an American fast food chain, thus making the food they serve the most disgusting and unhealthy thing you can find) I'm still eating it.
First of all, the topic at hand is marriage. Secondly, since you believe the value in straight couples is children, that is presumably the value you see in married couples. Meaning, according to the rules you have set, infertile couples or couples who don't wish to have children are also inherently inferior. And since the topic at hand is married couples, presumably that also applies to marriage. If any of that is wrong, it's because you didn't specify otherwise.DragonLord Seth said:Wow, not only did you completely misunderstand my point, but you also got pissed off! Just like last time I tried using this argument!
Did I mention your examples? No. So shut the fuck up. I was making a general statement about what a straight marriage can do, as opposed to a homofaggotual one. Why should your examples be excluded from marriage? Did I say that marriage MUST equal a kid? No. So fuck off and read a post before getting flustered.
Sure. The CEO is welcome to express whatever bigoted, asinine views he may have. I'm also allowed to say "Sheesh, why should I buy my fatty snacks from you when I can go to KFC instead?"Evil Smurf said:I have a friend who does not drink gloria jeans coffee because the ceo does not agree with gay people. I asked her why does it matter and she said, because it just does.
In short some people cannot accept other peoples beliefs and ideals and flat out refuse to be seen with people they disagree with.
That would all be well and good... were it not for the fact that he donates money to efforts to prevent homosexual marriage from being allowed.yeti585 said:Anyone calling this man a bigot for believing that part of his religion be kept "sacred" is the bigot. Whether you believe in this religion or not, if you are going to be intolerant of it you are the bigot.