awesomeClaw said:
Well, time for another dilemma, folks! How do you feel about circumcision? Is it good? Bad? Should it be legal? No? Yes?
Personally, i think i´ll weigh the pros and cons against eachother.
I find your list of Pros and Cons to be based on a lot of myths.
PROS:
Easier to clean.
- FALSE: They're equally easy to clean for the most part; you just need water and possibly some soap. It's really not rocket science.
Lasts longer (during sex)
- FALSE: Having foreskin does not have any impact on how long one can last during sex. It's possible to be intact and still take a very long time to climax (or even be unable to).
Reduces risks of some diseases.
- This is debatable. The best prevention from disease is practicing safe sex, since circumcision does not make one immune to anything the risk is still there.
CONS:
Loss of about 40-50% pleasure during sex.
- Debatable, and the percentage is spurious. Perhaps a better wording could be "reduced sensitivity". I think your point is that generally foreskin provides pleasure, and removing it prevents someone from experiencing that pleasure.
More prone to certain diseases.
- Debatable again, same as above.
Really, there are no valid "Pros" for routine child circumcision. There are serious ethical concerns however, which leads to an important point:
*
A parent does not actually OWN their child's genitals.*
Without a valid medical reason, any forced body modification is extremely unethical, especially since any amputation has a great risk for complications. Any arguments for aesthetics (as some other posters are making) are moot, since it doesn't matter what YOU think looks better, it's up to the owner of the penis to decide what HE prefers.
PROS:
- None
CONS:
- Amputating a person's body parts for no medical reason, and without their consent, is unethical.
- Amputation of any body part may lead to serious complications, including death.
- Foreskin typically provides pleasure, and removing it denies a person that pleasure.