Poll: Circumcision - What is your opinion?

Recommended Videos

lostzombies.com

New member
Apr 26, 2010
812
0
0
Started in the desert hundreds and hundreds of years ago to stop infections ie sand getting trapped then rubbing and causing said infection.

People were wrongly told it was for religious reasons so kept doing it. In a modern society the only benefit (ie hygene) is a non issue unless you are a dirty bastard and can't be bothered to spend an extra minute washing yourself. But if you are like that you probably won't be using your equpiment anytime toon anyway.

If people want to abide by some ancient old wives tale and mutilate their own children before they can choose for themselves then far be it for common sense to prevail. I feel sorry for children when I see them with their ears pierced when they are 2 years old by their 'parents' so you can probably guess my opinion on hacking off a piece of their penis for even less of a reason than fashion.

If you're an adult and want it dont they go for it, get an earring and tattoo while you're at it; it's your body.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Shouldn't be done until the person can decide. It is essentially genital mutilation.

Obviously if its medically necessary/recommended when the child is too young to choose then that's acceptable.
 

Nova Helix

New member
Mar 17, 2010
212
0
0
It is an optional purely cosmetic procedure. It is only done because of old fashioned religious ideas, is child abuse and mutilation.
 

trollnystan

I'm back, baby, & still dancing!
Dec 27, 2010
1,281
0
0
Male circumcision for religious or medical reasons? No problem with that. But I don't get why you would circumcise your baby for any reason other than that. It got put there by evolution (or God if you believe in that) for a reason after all. [small]Then again we also have appendices for some reason...[/small]

Heck, we women bleed once a month. I think you guys can manage to clean your willies now and again, yeah? (See? Equality! ;P)
 

lostzombies.com

New member
Apr 26, 2010
812
0
0
Nova Helix said:
It is an optional purely cosmetic procedure. It is only done because of old fashioned religious ideas, is child abuse and mutilation.
/thread

If I cut the little finger off my child when it was born and claimed quazi-religious reasons for doing so, then I would be in jail for it.
 

Jamboxdotcom

New member
Nov 3, 2010
1,276
0
0
female circumcision shouldn't even be mentioned. it's not circumcision, it's outright mutilation. it doesn't just eliminate the ability of a woman to orgasm, it completely eliminates their ability to enjoy sex at all.

for those who would say that male circumcision is just as bad, i and thousands of other circumcised males can tell you we function perfectly fine, sexually.
 

JaredXE

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,378
0
0
The big problem I have is when people throw around the "Fact" that there is a loss of pleasure with a circumcised penis.....how the hell do they know? Are circumcised men incapable of having orgasms? Are they suddenly unwilling to have sex because it doesn't feel good?

HELL NO. It's just a myth anti-circumcision people throw around.

I personally am all for it. It's easier for cleaning, helps protect against infection and for god's sake it's NORMAL. I've known way too many women who balk at an uncircumcised penis. I don't want my son to go through that. You do it as a baby, there's no memory of the event.
 

Mordwyl

New member
Feb 5, 2009
1,302
0
0
My dad once taught me if I don't clean the inside of my foreskin he'll cut it off. I learned, quickly.
 

Scabadus

Wrote Some Words
Jul 16, 2009
869
0
0
I totally agree with the OP's thoughts on the matter; what a rational adult does with their own body is their own buisness , but what some adults decide to do to their children is sick. Let them make their own decisions when they're old enough to think for themselves, sexual performance and STD resistance isn't going to affect them when they're five is it?

This is something I don't get, America and the UK will go to war with third world countries to protect their citizens against the horrors performed by the dictators (and totally not just for oil) yet they let their own citizens chop up children? Babies? Hell I hate babies; I think they're noisy, smelly, annoying and a massive waste of money, but they're still human and they'll still grow into someone perfectly capable of choosing which bits to chop off, and perfectly capable of wishing that their parents hadn't chosen for them.
 

Uszi

New member
Feb 10, 2008
1,214
0
0
awesomeClaw said:
Well, time for another dilemma, folks! How do you feel about circumcision? Is it good? Bad? Should it be legal? No? Yes?

Personally, i think i´ll weigh the pros and cons against eachother.


Loss of about 40-50% pleasure during sex.
As I recall, this study was fairly dubious. Do you have the link at all? I couldn't find it, just that it seemed like bumpkis when I first heard it.

But the thing is, that PARENTS can make the descision in many countries, which i think is abhorrent and simply put, wrong, since the practice is irreversible. And if you say "Oh but it can be restored" no, it can´t, not entirely. It can be HEALED, but not restored.
I was not traumatized by my circumcision.
I do not miss my foreskin.

Given that I have no misgivings about it, I do not expect my own kids to have any misgivings about it.

I will probably advocate the circumcision of my own children.

Also, uncircumcised penises are weird looking.

So, my opinion is: If you´re an adult and want to, then fine, good for you. If you´re an adult and you´re about to circumcise a kid, screw you.
Shrug?


BONUS DISCUSSION: I find it quite amusing how many people there is that say: "Male circumcision is fine, but Female circumcision is EVUUUUUUUUUUUULLLLLLLL!" I want to ask them a question. Do you believe in equality towards both genders? If yes, shouldn´t male/Female circumcision be just as bad/good as the other?

(For the record, i am aware that female circumcision has MUCH more severe consequences, and i believe it is just as wrong as male circumcision, but this just bugs me. Why scream out for equality when you don´t want it?)
How can you say that you are aware that female circumcision has "MUCH" more severe consequences, but that you think that male circumcision is just as bad?

Do you have any reason, at all, to think that? Or can I safely reject your claim that it is "just as bad" as subjective bullshitting?

For the record, if we were going to compare evil female castration to something similar in males, it would probably be bobbing the entire tip of the penis off in dudes. That would achieve a similar effect. And that would also be much more abhorrent than removing the foreskin, which is a non-issue.
 

Zykon TheLich

Extra Heretical!
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
3,506
850
118
Country
UK
I usually think unless there is a medical need e.g. recurring urinary infection or that thing where the skin hardens then it should be left until the person is old enough to make the decision themselves.

Female circumcision has varying degrees. It goes from removing part of the labia minor to hacking out a large portion of the vagina and sewing it shut. Some women have cosmetic surgery that removes part of the labia minor so from that you could sort of say some cosmetic surgery procedures were a form of female circumcision.
 

WildSeraph

New member
Jan 5, 2011
104
0
0
I've never been circumcised, and I don't plan on ever having it done. I can't stand the idea of the pain... But everyone I know is circumcised, and it makes it weird. I'm considered a freak...
 

BrightBlackDaylight

New member
Feb 14, 2011
25
0
0
JaredXE said:
I personally am all for it. It's easier for cleaning, helps protect against infection and for god's sake it's NORMAL. I've known way too many women who balk at an uncircumcised penis. I don't want my son to go through that. You do it as a baby, there's no memory of the event.
That really depends where you live. In the UK it's relatively rare to be circumcised compared to the US. As someone who lives in the UK, I just think circumcised penises look really weird, and to be quite honest, if I were faced with one, I wouldn't be entirely sure what to do ... :p
 

BrightBlackDaylight

New member
Feb 14, 2011
25
0
0
awesomeClaw said:
(For the record, i am aware that female circumcision has MUCH more severe consequences, and i believe it is just as wrong as male circumcision, but this just bugs me. Why scream out for equality when you don´t want it?)
Umm, we do want it. Female circumcision is generally worse than male circumcision - inequality. What's difficult about that?
 

Uszi

New member
Feb 10, 2008
1,214
0
0
trollnystan said:
Male circumcision for religious or medical reasons? No problem with that. But I don't get why you would circumcise your baby for any reason other than that. It got put there by evolution (or God if you believe in that) for a reason after all. [small]Then again we also have appendices for some reason...[/small]
Heh, you defeated your own argument.

Evolution does not produce objectively good designs. It produces functional designs with what it is given. For instance, exterior testicles are shitty, shitty design, most animals, and most mammals for that matter, have interior testicles. But it's what evolution had to work with when it came to Humans.

Your God-did-it argument is a little more sound, but then again Yahweh hates foreskins so I guess it doesn't apply broadly there either.
 

Choppaduel

New member
Mar 20, 2009
1,071
0
0
WildSeraph said:
I've never been circumcised, and I don't plan on ever having it done. I can't stand the idea of the pain... But everyone I know is circumcised, and it makes it weird. I'm considered a freak...
They're projecting their shame onto you. They know they cannot have it undone. If anything there the people with the body modifications are freaks.
 

Uszi

New member
Feb 10, 2008
1,214
0
0
Choppaduel said:
WildSeraph said:
I've never been circumcised, and I don't plan on ever having it done. I can't stand the idea of the pain... But everyone I know is circumcised, and it makes it weird. I'm considered a freak...
They're projecting their shame onto you. They know they cannot have it undone. If anything there the people with the body modifications are freaks.
Disagree.

Uncircumcised cock is pretty gross imho.
 

Ultrajoe

Omnichairman
Apr 24, 2008
4,719
0
0
JaredXE said:
THELL NO. It's just a myth anti-circumcision people throw around.

I personally am all for it. It's easier for cleaning, helps protect against infection and for god's sake it's NORMAL. I've known way too many women who balk at an uncircumcised penis. I don't want my son to go through that. You do it as a baby, there's no memory of the event.
The science is in, chopping off the major pleasure centers of the penis reduces the sensation experienced. Does the average victim notice? No, they've lived with the reduction all their lives. Hell, I was born without a sense of smell, I don't feel any 'effects' because I've never whiffed anything in my life. It's as hard to explain what a normal sexual encounter should feel like to a circumcision victim as it is to explain color to a blind man... or scent to me, in fact. I'd call the idea that women prefer scarred genitals and avoid the uncut ones far more mythic in quality.

Genital mutilation upon the unwilling is bad. That's what child circumcision is. Every culture has its awful little traditions, be they slavery, spousal abuse, xenophobia (common) or all the way up to the extremes of murder cultures. Just because something is an old tradition and a cherished one doesn't mean it isn't a bad idea.
 

Eldan

New member
Jun 22, 2008
91
0
0
Is that really an issue? I don't think I've ever met anyone who was circumcised.