As an uncircumcised person, I can honestly say, if you hadn't lost some pleasure and you had your glans hanging out and about in your pants all day every day, you would be in some serious pain/irritation.marscentral said:
Poll: Circumcision - What is your opinion?
- Thread starter awesomeClaw
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I had the chop as a baby & it has'nt affected my life in any negative way, I dont even remember it. And think what you will but id give my future boys the chop also. Besides its supposed to be worse when your an adult.
That's the thing, it is not for your children welfare, it is for your own peace of mind.MelziGurl said:
When they grow up it will be their biseness, not yours, and it is very unlikely they will develop something that will make them regret not being circumcised before. Also because it is proven that it will lessen their sexual pleasure.
Here's something less tldr and more serious (for both of you)Kimarous said:
http://www.cirp.org/library/sex_function/
Kimarous, I'm not hate mongering but you seem so sensitive I can't help but think you have a nagging feeling that I may be right, you can deny it of course. What I'm concerned about is that you would circumcise your children either for fitting in or out of some sort of misguided pride or spite. Thus making them and partners miss out on sexual pleasure too.
I can't help it if this makes you angry, and if you circumcise your children anyway, such is our cruel world, but if there's some tiny chance I can have an influence to make someone else's life a little better, I got to try.
I pray reconstructive surgery makes progresses so you could judge for yourself.
Given that the health and possiblity sexual benefits of circumcision are offset almost completely by the risks and health drawbacks, as well as possible sexual drawbacks, I think it should be up to the person themselves when their old enough for consent.
Of course, if their is a medical problem with the child that would be sorted out by circumcision (i.e. pain from the foreskin, etc, etc) then yes, I think it should be acceptable for the parent to make the call and have the child circumcised (Though the doctors should explore alternative treatments first).
Female circumcision on children is vastly more unpleasant and should definitely not be legal to perform on a child unless medical conditions require it.
Of course, if their is a medical problem with the child that would be sorted out by circumcision (i.e. pain from the foreskin, etc, etc) then yes, I think it should be acceptable for the parent to make the call and have the child circumcised (Though the doctors should explore alternative treatments first).
Female circumcision on children is vastly more unpleasant and should definitely not be legal to perform on a child unless medical conditions require it.
That's not necessarily a good thing - some people already have trouble achieving orgasm and circumcision would make that even harder. Now, granted, men have much higher chance of achieving orgasm as a population, but still.OldRat said:
Now, that said, I have no objection to an adult choosing to have a circumcision, especially if he has no other way to 'go the distance', but forcing circumcision on a child who's not even remotely close to being sexually active yet is just robbing them of their ability to decide for themselves.
Circumcision has about as much use as sanding off your nipples.
Sure, there isn't really a use for it, but even so, why go to the trouble of getting it removed?
Sure, there isn't really a use for it, but even so, why go to the trouble of getting it removed?
LEAVE BABY PENIS ALONE!
My circumcision was too aggressive, they took too much skin away from me. As a young boy, erections were PAINFUL. My skin was having trouble growing with me.
Mostly, as I grew, more and more scrotal skin ended up being pulled onto my shaft. So instead of having a nice smooth uncut penis, I had a ballsack that, at one point, connected half way up my shaft- and hair. Also, downward curve from being pulled so taught is not optimum.
I have been trying to correct this by manually stretching the skin myself, not the whole thing- just the skin. Skin grows if it's stretched often enough. The new skin is much lighter in color and so far I've managed to create an extra inch patch on the dorsal side.
Anyway, I wish I had a choice. Or at least wait until I'm fully grown for fucks sake. I would have had a porn star member.
My circumcision was too aggressive, they took too much skin away from me. As a young boy, erections were PAINFUL. My skin was having trouble growing with me.
Mostly, as I grew, more and more scrotal skin ended up being pulled onto my shaft. So instead of having a nice smooth uncut penis, I had a ballsack that, at one point, connected half way up my shaft- and hair. Also, downward curve from being pulled so taught is not optimum.
I have been trying to correct this by manually stretching the skin myself, not the whole thing- just the skin. Skin grows if it's stretched often enough. The new skin is much lighter in color and so far I've managed to create an extra inch patch on the dorsal side.
Anyway, I wish I had a choice. Or at least wait until I'm fully grown for fucks sake. I would have had a porn star member.
And all these people saying uncircumcised look nicer? Compared to what? Have you seen Ron Jeremy in 90's porn? It looks like a dried out piece of leather for fucks sake.
The penis is supposed to be a mucosal organ, it's supposed to be kept moist. Cutting a cock dries it out until it's as smooth and sensitive as a piece of elbow skin.
When do they look nicer? When they are soft? Does it really matter what a limp dick looks like?
When they blow up... guess what happens? Roll that stuff back and oh my! There's a smooth, shiny glans that puts a gnarly/bumpy cut one to shame.
Sorry- i just hear this uninformed nonsense so much and I get sick of it.
The penis is supposed to be a mucosal organ, it's supposed to be kept moist. Cutting a cock dries it out until it's as smooth and sensitive as a piece of elbow skin.
When do they look nicer? When they are soft? Does it really matter what a limp dick looks like?
When they blow up... guess what happens? Roll that stuff back and oh my! There's a smooth, shiny glans that puts a gnarly/bumpy cut one to shame.
Sorry- i just hear this uninformed nonsense so much and I get sick of it.
You can do what you wish with your body at your own risk, but you cannot do what you wish with the bodies of others at their risk.
Your God might say that you should, but Gods are easy to invent or recycle, so if we make laws on that basis then I may as well make a God who says that all parents who circumsize must be skinned alive and set on fire, and then us opponents would have a free card to do so.
Your God might say that you should, but Gods are easy to invent or recycle, so if we make laws on that basis then I may as well make a God who says that all parents who circumsize must be skinned alive and set on fire, and then us opponents would have a free card to do so.
I was circumcised at an early age but not as a baby. I'm not Jewish but apparently the foreskin was going to be too tight so I had to get it circumcised much like my father and grandfather who had the same problems.
I think reasons such as cases like my own and religion make it okay to get snipped but otherwise you might as well leave it there till the boy is 16 or something like that then they can decide for themselves
I think reasons such as cases like my own and religion make it okay to get snipped but otherwise you might as well leave it there till the boy is 16 or something like that then they can decide for themselves
I guess it sucks then that until the they reach such an age the child's business IS their parents which is 18-21 depending on where you live. Therefore, whether I circumcise my children or not will be my business. And my reasons have nothing do with sexual pleasure as I believe that is just a ridiculous excuse in some cases and they do have everything to do with the welfare of said child regardless of whether you believe my reasons to be for my own piece of mind.incal11 said:
I'm sure whatever I say has been said, but in today's world, hygiene isn't an issue in this area. I'm not circumcised and it's not hard to clean at all...if it is easier it can't be more than marginal, not warranting a significant "pros" spot.
The sex argument about feeling less is to my knowledge true, which does suck, but lasting longer depends on a lot of things. One could train themselves to last longer without removing the foreskin. Besides, I'm sure a guy would rather it felt better but lasted shorter.
I think it's wrong to do it to a child when they have no say, but if a responsible adult wants to make that decision then why not. His body.
The sex argument about feeling less is to my knowledge true, which does suck, but lasting longer depends on a lot of things. One could train themselves to last longer without removing the foreskin. Besides, I'm sure a guy would rather it felt better but lasted shorter.
I think it's wrong to do it to a child when they have no say, but if a responsible adult wants to make that decision then why not. His body.
Or they get a fuckwit to perform it and end up with their balls attached half way up their shaft when they're fully grown, like I did.The Dr0w Ranger said:
No baby mutilation. Not all circumcisions are performed to the same standard; and I'm not just talking about execution- there are actually different basic types that are more or less aggressive in their removal of extra skin.
I had an aggressive complete removal of all of it and they were a litle too aggressive or I grew too big...
As I child, I remember crying to my father about why pee pee hurt so bad when it got hard. He told me it was just muscle cramps and to stop being a baby.
Fuck you dad.
i dont really get why people say uncircumcised is weird looking etc.... if erect they are pretty much the same, its not like you have a huge flap of skin hanging around.
also fapping is easier + i dont do cutting of body parts neither does the rest of this country
why is it such an important thing america anyway? I mean its a jewish tradition and america is predominantly christian so...how did that happen
also fapping is easier + i dont do cutting of body parts neither does the rest of this country
why is it such an important thing america anyway? I mean its a jewish tradition and america is predominantly christian so...how did that happen
it does help regain some pleasure though, because the skin on the glans thickens without the foreskin in order to protect it and having your foreskin restored will reverse that process a bit and help out some, probally not as much as restoring the nerves but it seems from reading some stories it helps quite a bitSporky111 said: