Poll: COD4 or COD:WAW?

Recommended Videos

WrongSprite

Resident Morrowind Fanboy
Aug 10, 2008
4,503
0
0
Barry93 said:
WrongSprite said:
I voted CoD3 cause the multiplayer was the best i've ever seen in a game. CoD5 comes second, as it is Cod4, but improved. Plus i love WW2.

Barry93 said:
I know, I don't think I can play another WWII fps, there's what, 50 of them in existance?
Theres also a tonne of modern games....it doesnt mean you have to play them all, theres good ones and bad ones.


yes, but most modern games take place in the middle east and have been overused just as much as WWII
WTF? Thats my point! You just contradicted yourself!
 

Davey Woo

New member
Jan 9, 2009
2,468
0
0
Fightbulb said:
Davey Woo said:
That said everyone on CoD 4 rack up points with random grenades and matyrdom, so I've lost all faith in both for the time being.
Have you checked Hardcore mode? It's as close as you're going to get to a Martyrdom-free CoD.
Yes I have played hardcore on CoD4, and unless I'm the host (rarely) there's next to no point playing because I can't get rid of the giant sign above my head saying "FREE 10xp HERE!" On hardcore no matter what I do, or where I go everyone knows exactly where I am. Even with UAV Jammer and a Silenced gun.
Also Unless I'm host the games are really laggy regardless.
Besides I've moved on to Vegas 2 now
 

Barry93

New member
Mar 5, 2009
528
0
0
WrongSprite said:
Barry93 said:
WrongSprite said:
I voted CoD3 cause the multiplayer was the best i've ever seen in a game. CoD5 comes second, as it is Cod4, but improved. Plus i love WW2.

Barry93 said:
I know, I don't think I can play another WWII fps, there's what, 50 of them in existance?
Theres also a tonne of modern games....it doesnt mean you have to play them all, theres good ones and bad ones.


yes, but most modern games take place in the middle east and have been overused just as much as WWII
WTF? Thats my point! You just contradicted yourself!
How'd i contradict myself? my point is that WWII and the middle east get overused and are extremely boring now. the only games i actually like have unrealistic plots and gameplay elements
 

Super Jamz

New member
Apr 16, 2009
141
0
0
WaW improved multiplayer balance slightly, but not enough to have me prestige. CoD4 never really gets old, loads still play it and each game is still as fun as the last.
 

Dragon Zero

No one of note
Apr 16, 2009
710
0
0
Since you've made me choose, I've decided to go with World at War, even though it is a WW2 shooter it actually seems refreshing to me, especially since the single player takes place in parts of WW2 that are rarely ever done in shooters. Don't get me wrong, they are both great games but I liked World at War a little better. Plus Nazi-Zombies is a great experience!
 

JayDig

New member
Jun 28, 2008
142
0
0
CoD4 had a better campaign than W@W.

I dont care much for multiplayer of either games but at least W@W has co-op, too bad everyone plays stupid zombie mode instead. In my opinion, Call of Duty: United Offensive had the best multiplayer of the series (though I never played CoD3 online).

Here's hoping that Modern Warfare 2 has co-op.
 

stewart34

New member
Mar 23, 2009
111
0
0
Modern Warfare so easy of a decision.
The game at least veered of the trail of WW2 games. They they thought it would be good to make another old war game. We have enough of them already. Lets gets some diversity going on here. Modern Warfare was good. I liked the fact it is a good alternative to Halo in a sense at least the timeline is up to date on the game.

Modern Warfare shows a good image of what is going on right now in the world. All the WWII games are like a second history class that no one wants to hear about. All of them are the same. If you have played one WWII game then you know excatly what is going on in all the rest of the games.
 

Durahan2

New member
Mar 12, 2009
167
0
0
I love how people rant about how WaW is just a "Copy" of cod4; or better yet "it's another ww2 game". Boohoo *fake tear*, it's still a fun to play, and in the end thats what matters. Knifeing people is smoother too, plus flame throwers. I'd go with WaW. :p But if you have the money get both. You might have some friends who are pissed at the setting change.
 

soulasylum85

New member
Dec 26, 2008
667
0
0
im going with WaW because i dont play the cod games for the single player its the multiplayer i care about so the setting really makes no difference as long as the levels are designed well. i love both games but i have to say i think WaW is just a little better for the multiplayer. i just wish something could be done about all the little bitches who run around using juggernaut.
 

TZer0

New member
Jan 22, 2008
543
0
0
Not going to vote in this because I want the both-option. I think WaW is just as good as MW even though WaW got a lower metascore.
 

scorche

New member
Oct 9, 2008
65
0
0
i really thought that COD:WW was a step down from modern warfare. i only ever play modern warfare because i enjoyed it much more than COD:WW
 

ironmace2.0

The Names Hans Olo
Mar 15, 2009
509
0
0
cod 4 because there is going to be a second which dosent make much sense
but hell it'll be fun. And cod:waw was a bit boring but fun with zombies that was the best part. They bofe had good stories but cod4 was just fun and it was the first cod game I played.