Take a moment before you answer, and leave your anonymity induced Internet Hard-Assness at the door. Leave your gun control arguments at home. Leave your moral high-ground at the front desk. This thread isn't about what you think of anyone else here, it's for you to be a little introspective, and be honest with yourself, and us.
In this case, the word trigger is really metaphorical. I'm not talking about guns, so much as asking if you feel that when push comes to shove, when your life is on the line, could you take the life of the person trying to take yours?
I'll go ahead and start things off here. After all, how could I ask you to be honest with me, when I will not share my own feelings on the matter?
TL;DR version: I think I could take a life to defend my own.
EDIT! Added a question! And if you're up to it, please give us a little background on your responses.
EDIT2: The average self-defense range with a handgun is less than twenty feet, often closer to 6-7 tops. We're not talking about picking off the guy who's screaming at you from a roof top, we're talking about the person who's trying to beat you to death with a baseball bat, or shoot you, or just beat the shit out of you. Point is, they're not any further away than the up-close, you just have a ranged weapon (handgun most likely, not a lot of people carry crossbows these days).
Q: Do You think you could take a life to defend your own.
Q: The BadGuy is threatening not just your life, but your family's. Does this alter your reaction?
Q: Would the difference between the up-close kill, and the point and click of a ranged weapon have a difference on you?
Q: Would having a stranger's life on the line with yours make you change your reaction?
Discuss! Or answer! Serious thread is serious.
In this case, the word trigger is really metaphorical. I'm not talking about guns, so much as asking if you feel that when push comes to shove, when your life is on the line, could you take the life of the person trying to take yours?
I'll go ahead and start things off here. After all, how could I ask you to be honest with me, when I will not share my own feelings on the matter?
TL;DR version: I think I could take a life to defend my own.
"Who knows?" is the only response I can honestly give. My dislike of humanity, and general emotional detachment (a couple of people I've known for years think that I have Schizoid Personality Disorder) point to me not being overly beaten up over taking someone's life, especially if my own is on the line. If the media is to be believed, conditioning I've received from video games, especially combined with the combat training I've gained from martial arts, and airsofting with my brothers, make it more likely that I would competently pull the trigger against a fellow human, that I would be able to kill if it came to it.
I think it would be harder for me to do the deed unarmed, or at least, without a gun. The closeness of the act I think would leave a more lingering emotional/mental scarring.
The way I see it, the only way to know for sure, is to be in that situation, and walk out of it alive.
I think it would be harder for me to do the deed unarmed, or at least, without a gun. The closeness of the act I think would leave a more lingering emotional/mental scarring.
The way I see it, the only way to know for sure, is to be in that situation, and walk out of it alive.
EDIT! Added a question! And if you're up to it, please give us a little background on your responses.
EDIT2: The average self-defense range with a handgun is less than twenty feet, often closer to 6-7 tops. We're not talking about picking off the guy who's screaming at you from a roof top, we're talking about the person who's trying to beat you to death with a baseball bat, or shoot you, or just beat the shit out of you. Point is, they're not any further away than the up-close, you just have a ranged weapon (handgun most likely, not a lot of people carry crossbows these days).
Q: Do You think you could take a life to defend your own.
Q: The BadGuy is threatening not just your life, but your family's. Does this alter your reaction?
Q: Would the difference between the up-close kill, and the point and click of a ranged weapon have a difference on you?
Q: Would having a stranger's life on the line with yours make you change your reaction?
MattyDienhoff said:There are good reasons police don't "shoot people in the leg just to stop them".
1: There is no safe place to shoot someone. Shoot someone in the shoulder in real life and it's unlikely that it'll just incapacitate them for a while, and they'll be up and about the next day with their arm in a sling like in the movies. Depending on where it hits, the bullet could destroy the ball-and-socket joint in the shoulder, leaving the subject's arm useless, or it could ricochet off of the scapula and end up in the chest cavity, or it could nick a major blood vessel. In any case you could still kill the person.
2: It's easy to miss. A bullet is a small thing and it's very easy to miss your target, especially in an adrenaline-charged, "kill or be killed" kind of scenario. Soldiers and law enforcement officers are trained to aim for center of mass (i.e. the torso) for a reason, it gives the highest chance of hitting and incapacitating the target.
You might try to shoot an attacker in the leg, hoping to just incapacitate them. Assuming you don't miss, the bullet may sever the femoral artery. That gives your attacker a few minutes to live, in which time they may retaliate and fire back. Result: You're both dead.