shrekfan246 said:
There would be some interesting hurdles to get past, I'm sure, but hey, if they can live a productive life deaf/blind, why should I have a problem with it?
See, I can sort of see the hurdles, but it never really was something that registered with me.
Dirty Hipsters said:
The thing about blind people is that I really wouldn't be able to share any of my interests with them. I'm a very physical, outdoorsy person. I like going running, hiking, biking, swimming, etc. Those are mostly things that blind people can't do. Not to mention that my hobbies are also very visual (video games, movies, shooting). What's the point of dating someone if you can't share any of your interests with them?
I can sort of see your point, honestly. I'm not really focused enough on one set of activities for that to be an issue, but I guess it could be.
As I am a major audio freak. While music isn't the sum total of my life/hobbies, I kind of wonder how that would jive with someone who couldn't hear, assuming I could ever get past the communications issues.
Then again, I've known at least three deaf people who wanted to be drummers[footnote]And really, I don't see how being deaf would stop them from hanging around real musicians[/drummer joke][/footnote]....
Strazdas said:
I probably wouldnt be willnig to go for a blind person, simply because i would ahve to give up a lot of interests that require vision for that.
I would definatelly not differentiate the deaf one. Sure he cant hear music and whatnot, but thats not a dealbreaker. i guess text messages are great for deaf people now, i dredd to think how hard was for the to communicate back when few peopel were litterate.
I'm not sure you have to give up your interests just because someone's blind/deaf. You just can't shared certain interests. But I mean, people don't do everything together, do they? Even in a relationship, I've always valued some autonomy.
Like I said, I wonder if this would strain a relationship, but I'm not sure of even that.
Candidus said:
The simple reason is the communications barrier. I wouldn't learn to sign because I'm simply incapable of that sort of overt, exaggerated physical expression. I'm a reserved man, absolutely not comfortable with acting out, charades style. I'd word it this strongly: I'd be irrationally disgusted with myself.
Just pointing out ASL can be done in a reserved fashion. Probably other sign languages, too, but I only have experience with ASL and a slight experience with SEL (Signed Exact English, or "hey deaf people, why can't you talk normal like the rest of us!" which is what they really mean when they push it). It can tend towards the hyperbolic but doesn't require it.
Hell, since I grew up in a town with a large deaf community, I can tell you a lot of the locals just finger spell everything. And that's just moving one hand. Pretty small gestures, too. It's not perfect, but it works.
I'm curious if that changes your input at all.
I mean, maybe you still wouldn't want to learn, maybe you still couldn't. A new language isn't EASY by any stretch.