Yup, my thoughts exactly.kman123 said:I really enjoyed it...it's production values were amazing...but it was streamlined to the point of crazy linear. I mean, the first one may have had pretty shoddy driving controls, but it gave the sense of huge worlds. The second one was just corridor after corridor.
That being said, I still loved it, replayed it about 5 times.
And what woud that agenda be?Xaositect said:Absolutely detested it and its damn near ruined the series for me.
Edit: Poll is a bit pointless really. The vast majority are going to say like, even if they preferred the first game and didnt like the changes because ultimately, they DID like the game, even if it wasnt as much as they wanted to.
Should have been more broad in terms of opinions on the game instead of just a black and white like/dislike. OP has an agenda though, so I guess its mission accomplished.
To counteract the negativity you have seen on other forums and clearly dont like.SacremPyrobolum said:And what woud that agenda be?
Yeah, there's absolutely no character building to it, except for the linear upgrade system which is functional, gives me a reason to do side quests at least.RedEyesBlackGamer said:This. I though it was an awesome shooter with a great story. But it is funny how it pretends to be a RPG.AlternatePFG said:Great game, bad RPG, in my opinion.
The only thing that can say is that I am not very good at making pros and cons lists.Xaositect said:To counteract the negativity you have seen on other forums and clearly dont like.SacremPyrobolum said:And what woud that agenda be?
When your only real criticism of the game is the boxart, I dont think you are looking for anything other masses of like votes to outnumber dislikes. If you had posted a number of more varied views for people to choose from, I wouldnt have said anything.